Exploratory analysis of spontaneous versus paced breathing on heart rate variability in veterans with combat-related traumatic injury.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13164
Rabeea Maqsood, Susie Schofield, Alexander N Bennett, Ahmed Khattab, Anthony M J Bull, Nicola T Fear, Christopher J Boos
{"title":"Exploratory analysis of spontaneous versus paced breathing on heart rate variability in veterans with combat-related traumatic injury.","authors":"Rabeea Maqsood, Susie Schofield, Alexander N Bennett, Ahmed Khattab, Anthony M J Bull, Nicola T Fear, Christopher J Boos","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiration is a crucial determinant of autonomic balance and heart rate variability (HRV). The comparative effect of spontaneous versus paced breathing on HRV has been almost exclusively explored in healthy adults and never been investigated in an injured military cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effect of spontaneous versus paced breathing on HRV in veterans with combat-related traumatic injury (CRTI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ArmeD serVices trAuma rehabilitatioN outComE (ADVANCE) study, Stanford Hall, UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The sample consisted of 100 randomly selected participants who sustained CRTI (eg, amputation) during their deployment (Afghanistan 2003-2014) and were recruited into the ongoing ADVANCE prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>HRV was recorded using a single-lead ECG. HRV data were acquired during a sequential protocol of 5-minute spontaneous breathing followed immediately by 5 minutes of paced breathing (six cycles/minute) among fully rested and supine participants. HRV was reported using time domain (root mean square of successive differences), frequency domain (low frequency and high frequency) and nonlinear (sample entropy) measures. The agreement between HRV during spontaneous versus paced breathing was examined using the Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 36.5 ± 4.6 years. Resting respiratory rate was significantly higher with spontaneous versus paced breathing (13.4 ± 3.4 vs. 7.6 ± 2.0 breaths/minute; p < .001), respectively. Resting mean heart rate and root mean square of successive differences were significantly higher with paced breathing than spontaneous breathing (p < .001). Paced breathing significantly increased median low frequency power than spontaneous breathing (p < .001). No significant difference was found in the absolute power of high frequency between the two breathing protocols. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed poor agreement between HRV values during spontaneous and paced breathing conditions with wide limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Slow-paced breathing leads to higher HRV than spontaneous breathing and could overestimate resting \"natural-state\" HRV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"1079-1087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Respiration is a crucial determinant of autonomic balance and heart rate variability (HRV). The comparative effect of spontaneous versus paced breathing on HRV has been almost exclusively explored in healthy adults and never been investigated in an injured military cohort.

Objective: To examine the effect of spontaneous versus paced breathing on HRV in veterans with combat-related traumatic injury (CRTI).

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting: ArmeD serVices trAuma rehabilitatioN outComE (ADVANCE) study, Stanford Hall, UK.

Participants: The sample consisted of 100 randomly selected participants who sustained CRTI (eg, amputation) during their deployment (Afghanistan 2003-2014) and were recruited into the ongoing ADVANCE prospective cohort study.

Intervention: Not applicable.

Main outcome measure: HRV was recorded using a single-lead ECG. HRV data were acquired during a sequential protocol of 5-minute spontaneous breathing followed immediately by 5 minutes of paced breathing (six cycles/minute) among fully rested and supine participants. HRV was reported using time domain (root mean square of successive differences), frequency domain (low frequency and high frequency) and nonlinear (sample entropy) measures. The agreement between HRV during spontaneous versus paced breathing was examined using the Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: The mean age of participants was 36.5 ± 4.6 years. Resting respiratory rate was significantly higher with spontaneous versus paced breathing (13.4 ± 3.4 vs. 7.6 ± 2.0 breaths/minute; p < .001), respectively. Resting mean heart rate and root mean square of successive differences were significantly higher with paced breathing than spontaneous breathing (p < .001). Paced breathing significantly increased median low frequency power than spontaneous breathing (p < .001). No significant difference was found in the absolute power of high frequency between the two breathing protocols. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed poor agreement between HRV values during spontaneous and paced breathing conditions with wide limits of agreement.

Conclusion: Slow-paced breathing leads to higher HRV than spontaneous breathing and could overestimate resting "natural-state" HRV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索性分析自发呼吸与节律呼吸对与战斗有关的创伤退伍军人心率变异性的影响。
背景:呼吸是决定自律神经平衡和心率变异性(HRV)的关键因素。自发呼吸与节律呼吸对心率变异性的比较效应几乎只在健康成人中进行过探讨,从未在受伤的军人队列中进行过调查:研究自发呼吸与节拍呼吸对战斗相关创伤(CRTI)退伍军人心率变异的影响:设计:观察性队列研究:地点:英国斯坦福霍尔,ArmeD serVices trAuma rehabilitatioN outComE(ADVANCE)研究:样本包括随机抽取的 100 名参与者,他们在部署期间(阿富汗,2003-2014 年)遭受了 CRTI(如截肢),并被纳入正在进行的 ADVANCE 前瞻性队列研究:主要结果测量:使用单导联心电图记录心率变异。心率变异数据是在完全休息和仰卧的参与者进行 5 分钟自主呼吸后立即进行 5 分钟有节奏呼吸(6 次/分钟)的连续方案中获得的。心率变异采用时域(连续差值的均方根)、频域(低频和高频)和非线性(样本熵)测量方法进行报告。使用布兰-阿尔特曼分析法检验了自发呼吸与节律呼吸时心率变异的一致性:结果:参与者的平均年龄为 36.5 ± 4.6 岁。结果:参与者的平均年龄为(36.5±4.6)岁,自主呼吸时的静息呼吸频率明显高于节律呼吸时的静息呼吸频率(13.4±3.4 对 7.6±2.0 次/分钟;P 结论:慢节律呼吸会导致更高的心率变异:慢节奏呼吸导致心率变异高于自主呼吸,可能会高估静息 "自然状态 "心率变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release utilizing a modified 20-gauge spinal needle. Self-perceived preparedness for practice among graduating physical medicine & rehabilitation residents. Knee joint mechanics during gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a partial or full thickness quadriceps tendon autograft at 2 years after surgery. Test Smart, Treat Smart-using clinician feedback to adapt a catheter-associated urinary tract infection intervention for spinal cord injury. Racial disparities in prosthesis use, satisfaction, and physical function in upper limb amputation and the impact of veteran status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1