Analysis of the Marginal Continuity in Different Designs of Monolithic Zirconia Inlay-Retained Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.

The International journal of prosthodontics Pub Date : 2024-04-22 Epub Date: 2023-05-24 DOI:10.11607/ijp.7875
Mohamed T El Halawani, Yelhla S Aboushady, Sally M Abdel Kader, Stefano Benedicenti, Luca Solimei, Antonio Signore
{"title":"Analysis of the Marginal Continuity in Different Designs of Monolithic Zirconia Inlay-Retained Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Mohamed T El Halawani, Yelhla S Aboushady, Sally M Abdel Kader, Stefano Benedicenti, Luca Solimei, Antonio Signore","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the marginal integrity of three inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis (IRFDP) designs fabricated using monolithic zirconia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 30 IRFDPs were fabricated using 4-YTZP monolithic zirconia and randomly divided into three groups according to the cavity design. Groups ID2 and ID1.5 received an inlay cavity preparation, which includes a proximal box and an occlusal extension with a depth of 2 mm or 1.5 mm, respectively. Group PB received a proximal box cavity preparation without an occlusal extension. The restorations were fabricated and cemented using a dual-cure resin cement (Panavia V5) and subjected to an equivalent of 5 years of aging. The specimens were evaluated under an SEM to measure marginal continuity before and after the aging process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the whole 5-year aging process, no specimens showed signs of cracking, fracture, or loss of retention in any restorations. In the SEM analysis, most marginal defects observed in the restorations were areas of microgaps at the tooth/cement interface (TC) or zirconia/cement interface (ZC), resulting in loss of adaptation. There was a significant difference between the groups after the aging process at both the TC (F = 4.762, P < .05) and ZC (F = 6.975, P < .05), with Group ID2 presenting the best performance. There was a significant difference between TC and ZC in all groups (P < .05), with ZC presenting more gaps in all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inlay cavity designs including a proximal box and an occlusal extension exhibited better marginal stability than a proximal box without occlusal extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"37 2","pages":"173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the marginal integrity of three inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis (IRFDP) designs fabricated using monolithic zirconia.

Materials and methods: In total, 30 IRFDPs were fabricated using 4-YTZP monolithic zirconia and randomly divided into three groups according to the cavity design. Groups ID2 and ID1.5 received an inlay cavity preparation, which includes a proximal box and an occlusal extension with a depth of 2 mm or 1.5 mm, respectively. Group PB received a proximal box cavity preparation without an occlusal extension. The restorations were fabricated and cemented using a dual-cure resin cement (Panavia V5) and subjected to an equivalent of 5 years of aging. The specimens were evaluated under an SEM to measure marginal continuity before and after the aging process.

Results: During the whole 5-year aging process, no specimens showed signs of cracking, fracture, or loss of retention in any restorations. In the SEM analysis, most marginal defects observed in the restorations were areas of microgaps at the tooth/cement interface (TC) or zirconia/cement interface (ZC), resulting in loss of adaptation. There was a significant difference between the groups after the aging process at both the TC (F = 4.762, P < .05) and ZC (F = 6.975, P < .05), with Group ID2 presenting the best performance. There was a significant difference between TC and ZC in all groups (P < .05), with ZC presenting more gaps in all groups.

Conclusions: Inlay cavity designs including a proximal box and an occlusal extension exhibited better marginal stability than a proximal box without occlusal extension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同设计的单晶氧化锆嵌体固位固定义齿边缘连续性分析:体外研究。
目的:评估使用整体氧化锆制作的三种嵌体固位固定义齿(IRFDP)设计的边缘完整性:共使用 4-YTZP 整体氧化锆制作了 30 个 IRFDP,并根据牙洞设计随机分为三组。ID2组和ID1.5组接受嵌体预备,包括近端盒和咬合扩展,深度分别为2毫米和1.5毫米。PB 组接受不含咬合扩展的近端盒洞预备。使用双固化树脂水门汀(Panavia V5)制作和粘接修复体,并进行相当于 5 年的老化。在扫描电子显微镜下对试样进行评估,以测量老化过程前后的边缘连续性:在整个 5 年的老化过程中,没有任何修复体出现开裂、断裂或固位力丧失的迹象。在扫描电子显微镜分析中,在修复体上观察到的大多数边缘缺陷都是牙齿/水泥界面(TC)或氧化锆/水泥界面(ZC)上的微间隙区域,导致适应性丧失。各组之间在 TC(F = 4.762,P < .05)和 ZC(F = 6.975,P < .05)老化过程后存在明显差异,其中 ID2 组表现最佳。在所有组中,TC 和 ZC 都有明显的差异(P < .05),ZC 在所有组中都有更多的间隙:结论:与没有咬合扩展的近端盒相比,包括近端盒和咬合扩展的嵌体洞设计具有更好的边缘稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Workflow for Rehabilitation of Severely Discolored Teeth Due to Red Staining from Endodontic Material. Influence of Different Cements on Bonding Efficiency Between Implant Abutment and Standard Restoration. Thirty-Year Clinical Performance of Double-Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures - A Practice-Based Retrospective Study. Evaluation of the Bond Strengths Between Dental Ceramics and Co-Cr Frameworks Made with Digital and Conventional Techniques. 3D-Printed Permanent Resin Crowns on Pre-Molar and Molar Teeth; Two-Year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1