Implementing an Evidence-Based Functional Pain Assessment Scale in an Adult Inpatient Unit

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.004
{"title":"Implementing an Evidence-Based Functional Pain Assessment Scale in an Adult Inpatient Unit","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The focus on pain assessment using a single, one-dimension pain assessment scale can be problematic. Locally, challenges we faced with this were; a) pain was percieved as not being effectively managed, b) patients with chronic pain were not having their pain adequately controlled, and c) misconceptions and subsequent confusion between health care teams and patients related to what pain intensity scores mean to each individual.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The purpose of this paper is to describe an evidence-based practice project aiming at improving pain assessment through the implementation of a Functional Pain Scale (FPS) on an adult inpatient cardiothoracic unit.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The Iowa Model-Revised and the Implementation Strategies for Evidence- Based Practice Guide served as the framework for this project.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Over an 18-month period at a academic tertiary medical center in the midwest.</p></div><div><h3>Participants/Subjects</h3><p>Staff and patients on an adult inpatient 48-bed medical and surgical cardiothoracic unit.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following a synthesis of the evidence, implementation of the FPS required various strategies, such as, individualized patient and staff education, audit<span> and feedback, a pain policy revision, and creating documentation in the electronic medical record. Evaluation of the FPS consisted of patient and staff surveys pre- and postimplementation to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the pilot period, over 75% of the patients preferred to use the FPS and almost all the patients found the scale easy to use. Nurses reported an increase in perception that pain documentation was complete, that the FPS allowed them to accurately document their patients’ pain experience, and that their patients were well informed of their pain management plan.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This project supports successful implementation of the FPS within nursing workflow. The goal of using the FPS is to change pain management discussions from an intensity reduction to meeting goals of care, aligning expectations, and creating common language among patients and providers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The focus on pain assessment using a single, one-dimension pain assessment scale can be problematic. Locally, challenges we faced with this were; a) pain was percieved as not being effectively managed, b) patients with chronic pain were not having their pain adequately controlled, and c) misconceptions and subsequent confusion between health care teams and patients related to what pain intensity scores mean to each individual.

Aims

The purpose of this paper is to describe an evidence-based practice project aiming at improving pain assessment through the implementation of a Functional Pain Scale (FPS) on an adult inpatient cardiothoracic unit.

Design

The Iowa Model-Revised and the Implementation Strategies for Evidence- Based Practice Guide served as the framework for this project.

Setting

Over an 18-month period at a academic tertiary medical center in the midwest.

Participants/Subjects

Staff and patients on an adult inpatient 48-bed medical and surgical cardiothoracic unit.

Methods

Following a synthesis of the evidence, implementation of the FPS required various strategies, such as, individualized patient and staff education, audit and feedback, a pain policy revision, and creating documentation in the electronic medical record. Evaluation of the FPS consisted of patient and staff surveys pre- and postimplementation to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors.

Results

After the pilot period, over 75% of the patients preferred to use the FPS and almost all the patients found the scale easy to use. Nurses reported an increase in perception that pain documentation was complete, that the FPS allowed them to accurately document their patients’ pain experience, and that their patients were well informed of their pain management plan.

Conclusions

This project supports successful implementation of the FPS within nursing workflow. The goal of using the FPS is to change pain management discussions from an intensity reduction to meeting goals of care, aligning expectations, and creating common language among patients and providers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在成人住院病房实施以证据为基础的功能性疼痛评估量表。
背景:使用单一维度的疼痛评估量表进行疼痛评估可能会产生问题。在当地,我们面临的挑战是:a)疼痛被认为没有得到有效管理;b)慢性疼痛患者的疼痛没有得到充分控制;c)医护团队和患者对疼痛强度评分对每个人的意义存在误解,进而产生混淆。目的:本文旨在介绍一个循证实践项目,旨在通过在成人心胸科住院病房实施功能性疼痛量表(FPS)来改善疼痛评估:设计:爱荷华模式(修订版)和循证实践指南实施策略是该项目的框架:环境: 在美国中西部的一家三级学术医疗中心进行,为期 18 个月:参与人员/对象:拥有 48 张病床的心胸内外科成人住院病房的工作人员和患者:在对证据进行综合分析后,实施 FPS 需要采取各种策略,例如对患者和员工进行个性化教育、审核和反馈、疼痛政策修订以及在电子病历中创建文档。对 FPS 的评估包括实施前后的患者和员工调查,以评估知识、态度和行为:试点期结束后,超过 75% 的患者喜欢使用 FPS,几乎所有患者都认为该量表易于使用。护士们认为疼痛记录完整、FPS 使他们能够准确记录病人的疼痛经历以及病人对疼痛管理计划的知情程度都有所提高:该项目支持在护理工作流程中成功实施 FPS。使用 FPS 的目的是将疼痛管理讨论从减轻疼痛强度转变为实现护理目标、调整期望值以及在患者和医护人员之间创造共同语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of Social Determinants of Health and Pain Outcomes in Sickle Cell Disease. Pain Self-Management in Individuals With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain During Lebanon's Overlapping Crises. Implementation of a Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative to Support Implementation of the 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain: Case Study from Nurse-Led Clinics. Effects of Monochromatic Infrared Light on Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy: Randomized Controlled Trial. The Association Between Respiratory Functions, Pain Tolerance and Body Awareness in Obstructive Lung Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1