Comparison of psoas major activation during standing hip flexion between chronic low back pain and healthy populations.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/BMR-230384
Congcong Cai, Nurul Adliah Gazali, Xin Ning Tan, Benjamin Soon, Adrian Thian Huat Lee, Qian Wen Simone Aw, Dharini D/O Dana, Joanne Ching Tung Kwok, Mei Jun Kwa
{"title":"Comparison of psoas major activation during standing hip flexion between chronic low back pain and healthy populations.","authors":"Congcong Cai, Nurul Adliah Gazali, Xin Ning Tan, Benjamin Soon, Adrian Thian Huat Lee, Qian Wen Simone Aw, Dharini D/O Dana, Joanne Ching Tung Kwok, Mei Jun Kwa","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The psoas major (PM) has been identified as a potential contributor to chronic low back pain (LBP). However, few studies have investigated the effects of upright functional movement on PM activation in cLBP individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to compare PM muscle activation characteristics in chronic LBP (cLBP) and healthy subjects during the transition from quiet double-leg standing to standing hip flexion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ultrasound Imaging was used to assess PM thickness at the lumbar vertebral level of L4-5 in 12 healthy and 12 cLBP participants. The changes in thickness between the test positions were utilized as a proxy for PM activation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cLBP group exhibited greater thickness changes on the non-dominant side PM during contralateral hip flexion but not ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.369) compared to their healthy counterparts (p= 0.011; cLBP: resting 27.85 mm, activated 34.63 mm; healthy: resting 29.51 mm, activated 29.00 mm). There were no significant differences in dominant side PM thickness changes between the two groups during either contralateral or ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.306 and p= 0.077).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a potential overactivation of the PM in the cLBP population. This insight may aid in the development of tailored rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The psoas major (PM) has been identified as a potential contributor to chronic low back pain (LBP). However, few studies have investigated the effects of upright functional movement on PM activation in cLBP individuals.

Objective: This cross-sectional study aims to compare PM muscle activation characteristics in chronic LBP (cLBP) and healthy subjects during the transition from quiet double-leg standing to standing hip flexion.

Methods: Ultrasound Imaging was used to assess PM thickness at the lumbar vertebral level of L4-5 in 12 healthy and 12 cLBP participants. The changes in thickness between the test positions were utilized as a proxy for PM activation.

Results: The cLBP group exhibited greater thickness changes on the non-dominant side PM during contralateral hip flexion but not ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.369) compared to their healthy counterparts (p= 0.011; cLBP: resting 27.85 mm, activated 34.63 mm; healthy: resting 29.51 mm, activated 29.00 mm). There were no significant differences in dominant side PM thickness changes between the two groups during either contralateral or ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.306 and p= 0.077).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest a potential overactivation of the PM in the cLBP population. This insight may aid in the development of tailored rehabilitation programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较慢性腰痛患者和健康人群在站立屈髋时腰大肌的激活情况。
背景:腰大肌(PM)被认为是导致慢性腰背痛(LBP)的潜在因素。然而,很少有研究调查了直立功能运动对慢性腰背痛患者腰大肌激活的影响:本横断面研究旨在比较慢性腰背痛患者(cLBP)和健康受试者在从安静双腿站立过渡到站立屈髋时的 PM 肌肉激活特征:方法:采用超声波成像技术评估12名健康受试者和12名慢性膀胱炎受试者腰椎L4-5水平的腓肠肌厚度。测试体位之间的厚度变化被用作 PM 激活的替代指标:cLBP 组与健康组相比,在对侧屈曲髋关节时,非优势侧 PM 的厚度变化更大(p= 0.369),而同侧屈曲髋关节时则没有变化(p= 0.011;cLBP:静止时 27.85 毫米,激活时 34.63 毫米;健康:静止时 29.51 毫米,激活时 29.00 毫米)。在对侧或同侧屈髋时,两组间优势侧 PM 厚度变化无明显差异(p= 0.306 和 p= 0.077):我们的研究结果表明,在cLBP人群中,PM可能会过度激活。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在 cLBP 患者中存在 PM 过度激活的可能性,这一观点可能有助于制定有针对性的康复计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
期刊最新文献
Effects of time-dependent acupuncture on back muscle endurance in women with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized crossover trial. Effectiveness of monopolar diathermy by radiofrequency combined with exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Percutaneous functional spinal unit cementoplasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture complicated with endplate-disc complex injury: A retrospective case-control study. The back body temperatures of patients with idiopathic scoliosis measured through exercise Cognitive functional therapy for lower back pain: A meta-analytical assessment of pain and disability outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1