Congcong Cai, Nurul Adliah Gazali, Xin Ning Tan, Benjamin Soon, Adrian Thian Huat Lee, Qian Wen Simone Aw, Dharini D/O Dana, Joanne Ching Tung Kwok, Mei Jun Kwa
{"title":"Comparison of psoas major activation during standing hip flexion between chronic low back pain and healthy populations.","authors":"Congcong Cai, Nurul Adliah Gazali, Xin Ning Tan, Benjamin Soon, Adrian Thian Huat Lee, Qian Wen Simone Aw, Dharini D/O Dana, Joanne Ching Tung Kwok, Mei Jun Kwa","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The psoas major (PM) has been identified as a potential contributor to chronic low back pain (LBP). However, few studies have investigated the effects of upright functional movement on PM activation in cLBP individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to compare PM muscle activation characteristics in chronic LBP (cLBP) and healthy subjects during the transition from quiet double-leg standing to standing hip flexion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ultrasound Imaging was used to assess PM thickness at the lumbar vertebral level of L4-5 in 12 healthy and 12 cLBP participants. The changes in thickness between the test positions were utilized as a proxy for PM activation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cLBP group exhibited greater thickness changes on the non-dominant side PM during contralateral hip flexion but not ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.369) compared to their healthy counterparts (p= 0.011; cLBP: resting 27.85 mm, activated 34.63 mm; healthy: resting 29.51 mm, activated 29.00 mm). There were no significant differences in dominant side PM thickness changes between the two groups during either contralateral or ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.306 and p= 0.077).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a potential overactivation of the PM in the cLBP population. This insight may aid in the development of tailored rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The psoas major (PM) has been identified as a potential contributor to chronic low back pain (LBP). However, few studies have investigated the effects of upright functional movement on PM activation in cLBP individuals.
Objective: This cross-sectional study aims to compare PM muscle activation characteristics in chronic LBP (cLBP) and healthy subjects during the transition from quiet double-leg standing to standing hip flexion.
Methods: Ultrasound Imaging was used to assess PM thickness at the lumbar vertebral level of L4-5 in 12 healthy and 12 cLBP participants. The changes in thickness between the test positions were utilized as a proxy for PM activation.
Results: The cLBP group exhibited greater thickness changes on the non-dominant side PM during contralateral hip flexion but not ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.369) compared to their healthy counterparts (p= 0.011; cLBP: resting 27.85 mm, activated 34.63 mm; healthy: resting 29.51 mm, activated 29.00 mm). There were no significant differences in dominant side PM thickness changes between the two groups during either contralateral or ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.306 and p= 0.077).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest a potential overactivation of the PM in the cLBP population. This insight may aid in the development of tailored rehabilitation programs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.