Driving under the influence of cocaine and MDMA: Relationship between blood concentrations and results from clinical test of impairment.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of analytical toxicology Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1093/jat/bkae024
Gunhild Heide, Ragnhild Elén Gjulem Jamt, Jonas Fainberg-Sandbu, Åse Marit Leere Øiestad, Gudrun Høiseth
{"title":"Driving under the influence of cocaine and MDMA: Relationship between blood concentrations and results from clinical test of impairment.","authors":"Gunhild Heide, Ragnhild Elén Gjulem Jamt, Jonas Fainberg-Sandbu, Åse Marit Leere Øiestad, Gudrun Høiseth","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The general use of cocaine is increasing in recent years, while the trend for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is less clear. The relationship between blood concentrations and impairment is poorly understood, which complicates interpretation. The aims of this study were to report prevalence and blood concentrations of cocaine and MDMA in drugged drivers, and to investigate the relationship between blood concentrations and impairment. Samples of whole blood were collected from apprehended drivers in the period 2000-2022, and a clinical test of impairment (CTI) was simultaneously performed. The samples were initially analyzed for cocaine and MDMA using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (until 2009 and 2012, respectively), and later using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Overall, cocaine was detected in 2,331 cases and MDMA in 2,569 cases. There were 377 and 85 mono cases of cocaine and MDMA, respectively. In the mono cases, the median cocaine concentration was 0.09 mg/L (range: 0.02-1.15 mg/L), and 54% of the drivers were clinically impaired. The median MDMA concentration was 0.19 mg/L (range: 0.04-1.36 mg/L), and 38% were clinically impaired. There was a statistically significant difference in the median cocaine concentration between drivers assessed as not impaired (0.07 mg/L) and drivers assessed as impaired (0.10 mg/L) (P = 0.009). There was also a significant effect of the blood concentration of cocaine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-36.53, P = 0.036) and driving during the evening/night-time (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.34-3.51, P = 0.002) on the probability of being assessed as impaired on the CTI. No significant differences were found for MDMA. Many drivers are not assessed as impaired on a CTI following cocaine or especially MDMA use. For cocaine, a relationship between blood concentrations and impairment was demonstrated, but this could not be shown for MDMA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"380-387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The general use of cocaine is increasing in recent years, while the trend for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is less clear. The relationship between blood concentrations and impairment is poorly understood, which complicates interpretation. The aims of this study were to report prevalence and blood concentrations of cocaine and MDMA in drugged drivers, and to investigate the relationship between blood concentrations and impairment. Samples of whole blood were collected from apprehended drivers in the period 2000-2022, and a clinical test of impairment (CTI) was simultaneously performed. The samples were initially analyzed for cocaine and MDMA using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (until 2009 and 2012, respectively), and later using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Overall, cocaine was detected in 2,331 cases and MDMA in 2,569 cases. There were 377 and 85 mono cases of cocaine and MDMA, respectively. In the mono cases, the median cocaine concentration was 0.09 mg/L (range: 0.02-1.15 mg/L), and 54% of the drivers were clinically impaired. The median MDMA concentration was 0.19 mg/L (range: 0.04-1.36 mg/L), and 38% were clinically impaired. There was a statistically significant difference in the median cocaine concentration between drivers assessed as not impaired (0.07 mg/L) and drivers assessed as impaired (0.10 mg/L) (P = 0.009). There was also a significant effect of the blood concentration of cocaine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-36.53, P = 0.036) and driving during the evening/night-time (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.34-3.51, P = 0.002) on the probability of being assessed as impaired on the CTI. No significant differences were found for MDMA. Many drivers are not assessed as impaired on a CTI following cocaine or especially MDMA use. For cocaine, a relationship between blood concentrations and impairment was demonstrated, but this could not be shown for MDMA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在可卡因和亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺影响下驾车:血液浓度与临床损害测试结果之间的关系。
近年来,可卡因的普遍使用量在不断增加,而 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)的使用趋势则不太明显。人们对血液中的可卡因浓度与机能损伤之间的关系知之甚少,这使得解释变得更加复杂。本研究的目的是报告吸毒后驾车者体内可卡因和亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺的流行率和血液浓度,并调查血液浓度与机能损伤之间的关系。研究采集了2000-2022年期间被捕司机的全血样本,并同时进行了损伤临床测试(CTI)。样本中的可卡因和亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺最初采用气相色谱-质谱法进行分析(分别至 2009 年和 2012 年),后来采用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法进行分析。总体而言,在 2,331 个病例中检测出了可卡因,在 2,569 个病例中检测出了亚甲二氧基甲基安非他明。可卡因和亚甲二氧基甲基安非他明的单一病例分别为 377 例和 85 例。在单一案例中,可卡因浓度的中位数为 0.09 毫克/升(范围:0.02-1.15 毫克/升),54% 的司机存在临床症状。亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺浓度中位数为 0.19 毫克/升(范围:0.04-1.36 毫克/升),38%的驾驶员临床表现受损。可卡因浓度中位数在被评估为未受损的司机(0.07 毫克/升)和被评估为受损的司机(0.10 毫克/升)之间存在显著的统计学差异(P = 0.009)。可卡因血液浓度(调整赔率[aOR] = 6.42,95% 置信区间[CI] = 1.13-36.53,P = 0.036)和傍晚/夜间驾驶(aOR = 2.17,95% CI = 1.34-3.51,P = 0.002)对 CTI 评估为受损的概率也有明显影响。亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)与之无明显差异。许多驾驶者在吸食可卡因或特别是摇头丸后,在 CTI 中未被评估为能力受损。就可卡因而言,血液浓度与驾驶能力受损之间存在关系,但就亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺而言,则无法证明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Post-mortem distribution of MDPHP in a fatal intoxication case. Trends in Central/Peripheral Ratio of Fentanyl in Harris County, TX and Orange County, CA from 2009-2020. LC-MS/MS confirmation of 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8, Δ9, Δ1°) and hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) metabolites in authentic urine specimens. NSC-ADID Position Statement on Performance Impairment in Safety-Sensitive Positions Related to Cannabis and Other Cannabinoids. Optimization of a disposable pipette tips extraction (DPX) for the analysis of psychoactive substances in sweat specimens using Design of Experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1