Advance care planning before and during COVID-19: evaluation of 73,675 patients' records.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0145
Philippa G McFarlane, Catey Bunce, Katherine E Sleeman, Martina Orlovic, Jonathan Koffman, John Rosling, Alastair Bearne, Margaret Powell, Julia Riley, Joanne Droney
{"title":"Advance care planning before and during COVID-19: evaluation of 73,675 patients' records.","authors":"Philippa G McFarlane, Catey Bunce, Katherine E Sleeman, Martina Orlovic, Jonathan Koffman, John Rosling, Alastair Bearne, Margaret Powell, Julia Riley, Joanne Droney","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP) was encouraged by policymakers throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about use of ACP during this time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare use of ACP before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Retrospective, observational cohort study, comparing the creation, use and content of Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System records in London. Individuals aged 18+ with a Coordinate My Care Record, created and published in the pre-pandemic period (01/01/2018-31/12/2019), Wave1 (W1) (20/03/2020-04/07/2020), and Wave2 (W2) (01/10/2020-05/03/2021).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patient demographics and components of ACP were compared using descriptive and comparative statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73,675 records were included; 35,108 pre-pandemic, 21,235 W1, 9,925 W2. Most records were created in primary care (56% pre-COVID, 76% in W1 and 48% in W2).Compared to the pre-pandemic period, the average weekly number of records created increased by 297% W1 (<i>P</i><0.005) and 29.1% W2 (<i>P</i><0.005). Patients with records created during the pandemic were younger (61% aged 80+ W1, 59% W2, 65% pre-pandemic (<i>P</i><0.005)). Patients with records created in W1 had longer estimated prognoses at record creation (73% had an estimated prognosis of 1 year+ W1 vs 53% pre-pandemic (<i>P</i><0.005)) and were more likely to be \"For Resuscitation\" (38% W1 vs 30% pre-pandemic (<i>P</i><0.005)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased ACP activity was observed, especially in primary care, and for younger people and those not imminently dying. Further research is needed to identify training and planning requirements as well as organisational and system changes to support sustained high-quality ACP within primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) was encouraged by policymakers throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about use of ACP during this time.

Aim: To compare use of ACP before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design & setting: Retrospective, observational cohort study, comparing the creation, use and content of Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System records in London. Individuals aged 18+ with a Coordinate My Care Record, created and published in the pre-pandemic period (01/01/2018-31/12/2019), Wave1 (W1) (20/03/2020-04/07/2020), and Wave2 (W2) (01/10/2020-05/03/2021).

Method: Patient demographics and components of ACP were compared using descriptive and comparative statistics.

Results: 73,675 records were included; 35,108 pre-pandemic, 21,235 W1, 9,925 W2. Most records were created in primary care (56% pre-COVID, 76% in W1 and 48% in W2).Compared to the pre-pandemic period, the average weekly number of records created increased by 297% W1 (P<0.005) and 29.1% W2 (P<0.005). Patients with records created during the pandemic were younger (61% aged 80+ W1, 59% W2, 65% pre-pandemic (P<0.005)). Patients with records created in W1 had longer estimated prognoses at record creation (73% had an estimated prognosis of 1 year+ W1 vs 53% pre-pandemic (P<0.005)) and were more likely to be "For Resuscitation" (38% W1 vs 30% pre-pandemic (P<0.005)).

Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased ACP activity was observed, especially in primary care, and for younger people and those not imminently dying. Further research is needed to identify training and planning requirements as well as organisational and system changes to support sustained high-quality ACP within primary care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 之前和期间的预先护理计划:对 73,675 份患者记录进行评估。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,政策制定者一直鼓励预先护理计划 (ACP)。目的:比较 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间 ACP 的使用情况:回顾性观察队列研究,比较伦敦姑息关怀协调电子系统记录的创建、使用和内容。在大流行前(01/01/2018-31/12/2019)、Wave1(W1)(20/03/2020-04/07/2020)和Wave2(W2)(01/10/2020-05/03/2021)期间创建并发布的具有 "协调我的护理 "记录的 18 岁以上个人:方法:采用描述性统计和比较性统计对患者的人口统计学特征和 ACP 的组成部分进行比较:共纳入 73,675 份病历:大流行前 35,108 份,W1 21,235 份,W2 9,925 份。与大流行前相比,W1 平均每周创建的记录数增加了 297%(PPPPP):在 COVID-19 大流行期间,观察到 ACP 活动有所增加,尤其是在初级保健中,以及针对年轻人和非濒临死亡者。需要开展进一步研究,以确定培训和规划要求以及组织和系统变革,从而支持在初级医疗中持续开展高质量的 ACP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Exploring the facilitators and barriers to addressing social media's impact on anxiety within primary care: a qualitative study. Action on elevated natriuretic peptide in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study. 'ThinkCancer!': randomised feasibility trial of a novel practice-based early cancer diagnosis intervention. Signs and symptoms of serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to ambulatory care: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1