Regulating seafarers' welfare: an examination of the protection of Filipino seafarers' well-being through a legal analysis of the POEA-Standard Employment Contract.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Maritime Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5603/imh.98244
Jean Ver P Pia, Roderick Galam, Inga Bartusevičienė
{"title":"Regulating seafarers' welfare: an examination of the protection of Filipino seafarers' well-being through a legal analysis of the POEA-Standard Employment Contract.","authors":"Jean Ver P Pia, Roderick Galam, Inga Bartusevičienė","doi":"10.5603/imh.98244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Philippines is the global maritime industry's single biggest source of seafarers. This article examines how the Philippines protects the welfare of its seafarers working on board ocean-going vessels.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We employed a multi-method approach to better understand the POEA-SEC as a regulatory instrument. First, we analysed Philippine legislation and regulations that are shaping the employment, welfare, and working conditions of Filipino seafarers. Second, we examined the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC) which requires that minimum standards of employment for seafarers are met. We use legal analysis to examine three specific provisions that pertain to their well-being: duration of employment, monetary considerations, and working conditions in terms of hours of work and rest periods. Third, we analysed interview and focus group data on the experiences of Filipino seafarers on board ships in respect of the POEA-SEC's efficacy in protecting their well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the policy environment for Filipino seafarers shows how the interests of powerful actors have taken precedence over those of Filipino seafarers. Seafarers' experiences suggest that they cannot be reached by the contract, whether symbolic or otherwise. The contract fails to address seafarer issues, such as security of tenure, excessive working hours resulting in fatigue, stress and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POEA-SEC falls short as a legal document to address occupational, health and safety issues, which contribute to the detriment of seafarers' health and well-being. This indicates that the Philippine government cannot fully protect its seafarers.</p>","PeriodicalId":45964,"journal":{"name":"International Maritime Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Maritime Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/imh.98244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Philippines is the global maritime industry's single biggest source of seafarers. This article examines how the Philippines protects the welfare of its seafarers working on board ocean-going vessels.

Materials and methods: We employed a multi-method approach to better understand the POEA-SEC as a regulatory instrument. First, we analysed Philippine legislation and regulations that are shaping the employment, welfare, and working conditions of Filipino seafarers. Second, we examined the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC) which requires that minimum standards of employment for seafarers are met. We use legal analysis to examine three specific provisions that pertain to their well-being: duration of employment, monetary considerations, and working conditions in terms of hours of work and rest periods. Third, we analysed interview and focus group data on the experiences of Filipino seafarers on board ships in respect of the POEA-SEC's efficacy in protecting their well-being.

Results: Analysis of the policy environment for Filipino seafarers shows how the interests of powerful actors have taken precedence over those of Filipino seafarers. Seafarers' experiences suggest that they cannot be reached by the contract, whether symbolic or otherwise. The contract fails to address seafarer issues, such as security of tenure, excessive working hours resulting in fatigue, stress and anxiety.

Conclusions: The POEA-SEC falls short as a legal document to address occupational, health and safety issues, which contribute to the detriment of seafarers' health and well-being. This indicates that the Philippine government cannot fully protect its seafarers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规范海员福利:通过对 POEA-标准雇佣合同的法律分析研究菲律宾海员福利的保护问题。
背景:菲律宾是全球海运业最大的海员来源国。本文探讨了菲律宾如何保护在远洋船上工作的海员的福利:我们采用了多种方法来更好地理解作为监管工具的《菲律宾海员保护法》。首先,我们分析了影响菲律宾海员就业、福利和工作条件的菲律宾法律法规。其次,我们研究了《菲律宾海外就业管理局标准雇佣合同》(POEA-SEC),该合同要求海员达到最低雇佣标准。我们运用法律分析方法研究了与海员福祉相关的三项具体条款:雇用期限、货币因素以及工作时间和休息时间方面的工作条件。第三,我们分析了关于菲律宾海员在船上的经历的访谈和焦点小组数据,这些数据涉及《菲律宾国家经济和就业政策》在保护海员福祉方面的效力:对菲律宾海员政策环境的分析表明,有权势者的利益高于菲律宾海员的利益。海员的经历表明,无论是象征性合同还是其他合同,都无法触及海员的利益。合同未能解决海员问题,如任期保障、工作时间过长导致疲劳、压力和焦虑等:作为一份法律文件,POEA-SEC 没有解决职业、健康和安全问题,这些问题损害了海员的健康和福利。这表明菲律宾政府无法充分保护其海员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Maritime Health
International Maritime Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
37
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Self-reported diabetes mellitus among seafarers: occupational and sociodemographic predictors. Praziquantel as the preferred treatment for schistosomiasis. Regulating seafarers' welfare: an examination of the protection of Filipino seafarers' well-being through a legal analysis of the POEA-Standard Employment Contract. Sickle cell disease in the Zanzibar Archipelago, the Republic of Tanzania. MAGAZINE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1