Débora Araújo, Pierre-Emmanuel Bryckaert, Miguel Miranda, Vasco Rodrigues, Nicolas De Saint Aubert, Johann Menard, Eric Mandron
{"title":"Eighteen years of experience in laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency.","authors":"Débora Araújo, Pierre-Emmanuel Bryckaert, Miguel Miranda, Vasco Rodrigues, Nicolas De Saint Aubert, Johann Menard, Eric Mandron","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.12214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is a treatment option for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after failure of previous surgery or as a primary procedure in severe intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). The aim of the study was to assess the long-term efficacy and risk factors for surgical revision and definitive explantation of AUS laparoscopic implantation in female patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all women submitted to AUS implantation between April 2005 and March 2023 was conducted. The AUS was implanted via transperitoneal laparoscopic approach, by two experienced surgeons. The primary endpoint was postoperative continence. Continence was defined as no leakage and no pad usage or leakage and/or pad usage with no impact on social life and failure as leakage and/or pad usage impacting social life. As secondary outcomes, clinical predictive factors for AUS revision and definitive explantation were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the last 18 years, females with a mean age of 68±12 years-old were submitted to laparoscopic implantation of AUS. Early overall complication rate was 16%, but only one case was Clavien-Dindo ≥3. After a median follow-up of 67 months, 22.2% of the patients needed a device revision, the majority due to mechanical device dysfunction. AUS definitive explantation was performed in 16%, mainly due to urethral/vaginal erosion (9.9%) and infection (6.2%). Patients with age ≥70 years and follow-up ≥10 years significantly predisposed for device revision. At the time of the last follow-up, 72% of the patients were keeping the urinary continency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laparoscopic AUS implantation in females is an effective treatment for SUI due to ISD. Meanwhile, adequate patient selection, multidisciplinary evaluation and careful expectation management are essential to achieving good results, concerning their significant complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is a treatment option for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after failure of previous surgery or as a primary procedure in severe intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). The aim of the study was to assess the long-term efficacy and risk factors for surgical revision and definitive explantation of AUS laparoscopic implantation in female patients.
Methods: A retrospective review of all women submitted to AUS implantation between April 2005 and March 2023 was conducted. The AUS was implanted via transperitoneal laparoscopic approach, by two experienced surgeons. The primary endpoint was postoperative continence. Continence was defined as no leakage and no pad usage or leakage and/or pad usage with no impact on social life and failure as leakage and/or pad usage impacting social life. As secondary outcomes, clinical predictive factors for AUS revision and definitive explantation were evaluated.
Results: In the last 18 years, females with a mean age of 68±12 years-old were submitted to laparoscopic implantation of AUS. Early overall complication rate was 16%, but only one case was Clavien-Dindo ≥3. After a median follow-up of 67 months, 22.2% of the patients needed a device revision, the majority due to mechanical device dysfunction. AUS definitive explantation was performed in 16%, mainly due to urethral/vaginal erosion (9.9%) and infection (6.2%). Patients with age ≥70 years and follow-up ≥10 years significantly predisposed for device revision. At the time of the last follow-up, 72% of the patients were keeping the urinary continency.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic AUS implantation in females is an effective treatment for SUI due to ISD. Meanwhile, adequate patient selection, multidisciplinary evaluation and careful expectation management are essential to achieving good results, concerning their significant complication rate.
简介和目的:人工尿道括约肌(AUS)是应力性尿失禁(SUI)女性患者在既往手术失败后的一种治疗选择,也可作为严重内在括约肌缺失(ISD)的主要手术。该研究旨在评估女性患者腹腔镜 AUS 植入术的长期疗效以及手术翻修和最终切除的风险因素:方法:对2005年4月至2023年3月期间接受AUS植入术的所有女性进行回顾性研究。由两名经验丰富的外科医生通过经腹膜腹腔镜方法植入 AUS。主要终点是术后尿失禁。无漏尿和不使用尿垫或漏尿和/或使用尿垫不影响社交生活,以及漏尿和/或使用尿垫影响社交生活即为失禁。作为次要结果,还评估了AUS翻修和最终置换的临床预测因素:在过去的 18 年中,平均年龄为 68±12 岁的女性接受了腹腔镜 AUS 植入术。早期总并发症发生率为 16%,但只有一例 Clavien-Dindo ≥3。中位随访 67 个月后,22.2% 的患者需要进行装置翻修,其中大部分是由于机械装置功能障碍。16%的患者进行了 AUS 最终拆卸,主要原因是尿道/阴道侵蚀(9.9%)和感染(6.2%)。年龄≥70岁且随访时间≥10年的患者极易发生装置翻修。最后一次随访时,72%的患者保持排尿通畅:结论:女性腹腔镜 AUS 植入术是治疗 ISD 引起的 SUI 的有效方法。结论:女性腹腔镜 AUS 植入术是治疗 ISD 引起的 SUI 的有效方法。同时,考虑到其显著的并发症发生率,适当的患者选择、多学科评估和谨慎的预期管理对取得良好效果至关重要。