Clinical profile of amblyopia in a tertiary care facility without proper vision screening in Saudi Arabia.

IF 0.6 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-03-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_87_22
Shatha Alfreihi, Rana Alsoby, Latifah Abu Haimed, Omar Asiri, Mohammed A Meeli
{"title":"Clinical profile of amblyopia in a tertiary care facility without proper vision screening in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Shatha Alfreihi, Rana Alsoby, Latifah Abu Haimed, Omar Asiri, Mohammed A Meeli","doi":"10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_87_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical profile of amblyopia among patients referred to a tertiary care facility in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients between 1 and 14 years presenting to the amblyopia clinic from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Amblyopia was defined as visual acuity <0.2 LogMAR (20/30) in the worse eye or two-line difference between the two eyes. We classified patients into strabismic, refractive, mixed strabismic, and refractive and deprivation amblyopia. We subclassified our cohort according to age (< and ≥5 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and eighty-three patients (199 male 54%) were seen in our clinic. Seventeen patients were excluded because they did not meet our inclusion criteria. The mean age at presentation was 5.05 ± 2.49 years. Strabismic amblyopia was found in 180 (49%), refractive in 101 (27.6%), mixed in 69 (19%), and deprivation in 16 (4.2%). Anisometropia in 85.25% and isometropia in 14.75%. Hyperopic astigmatism was the most common refractive error in 246 (67.2%). Esotropia was the most common deviation (90%). Strabismic amblyopia was significantly higher in the <5 years group (62.4% vs. 36.7%). While refractive amblyopia was significantly higher in ≥5 years group (38.8% vs. 15.7%) (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strabismic amblyopia was the most commonly diagnosed in our cohort, especially among patients <5 years of age. Refractive amblyopia was more common in older patients and may be under-detected due to the lack of proper vision screening. The implementation of proper vision screening should help in early detection and successful treatment at an early age.</p>","PeriodicalId":46810,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"38 1","pages":"78-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_87_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical profile of amblyopia among patients referred to a tertiary care facility in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: All patients between 1 and 14 years presenting to the amblyopia clinic from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Amblyopia was defined as visual acuity <0.2 LogMAR (20/30) in the worse eye or two-line difference between the two eyes. We classified patients into strabismic, refractive, mixed strabismic, and refractive and deprivation amblyopia. We subclassified our cohort according to age (< and ≥5 years).

Results: Three hundred and eighty-three patients (199 male 54%) were seen in our clinic. Seventeen patients were excluded because they did not meet our inclusion criteria. The mean age at presentation was 5.05 ± 2.49 years. Strabismic amblyopia was found in 180 (49%), refractive in 101 (27.6%), mixed in 69 (19%), and deprivation in 16 (4.2%). Anisometropia in 85.25% and isometropia in 14.75%. Hyperopic astigmatism was the most common refractive error in 246 (67.2%). Esotropia was the most common deviation (90%). Strabismic amblyopia was significantly higher in the <5 years group (62.4% vs. 36.7%). While refractive amblyopia was significantly higher in ≥5 years group (38.8% vs. 15.7%) (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Strabismic amblyopia was the most commonly diagnosed in our cohort, especially among patients <5 years of age. Refractive amblyopia was more common in older patients and may be under-detected due to the lack of proper vision screening. The implementation of proper vision screening should help in early detection and successful treatment at an early age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯一家未进行适当视力筛查的三级医疗机构中弱视的临床概况。
目的:评估沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗机构转诊的弱视患者的临床概况:方法:对2016年至2020年期间所有到弱视门诊就诊的1至14岁患者进行回顾性研究。弱视被定义为视力问题:本诊所共接诊了 383 名患者(199 名男性,占 54%)。17名患者因不符合纳入标准而被排除在外。患者的平均年龄为 5.05±2.49 岁。180人(49%)患有斜视性弱视,101人(27.6%)患有屈光性弱视,69人(19%)患有混合性弱视,16人(4.2%)患有剥夺性弱视。85.25%的人患有异视,14.75%的人患有等视。246 人(67.2%)最常见的屈光不正是远视散光。内斜是最常见的偏差(90%)。斜视性弱视的比例明显高于内斜视(P < 0.001):结论:斜视性弱视是我们队列中最常见的诊断结果,尤其是在以下患者中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of ophthalmology. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology publishes original papers, clinical studies, reviews and case reports. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is the official publication of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
期刊最新文献
Ab externo Schlemm's canal surgery: Efficacy and safety outcomes. Acute corneal edema and residual subepithelial haze after bilateral selective laser trabeculoplasty: A case series. Advancing glaucoma management: Innovation, collaboration, and future directions. Microcatheter-assisted trabeculotomy in the treatment of primary congenital glaucoma: Current perspectives. Short-term safety and efficacy of ripasudil as "add-on therapy" in glaucoma patients on maximum tolerable glaucoma medication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1