A Comparison of Suicides in Public Safety Personnel With Suicides in the General Population in Ontario, 2014 to 2018.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000953
Simon Hatcher, Mark Sinyor, Nicole E Edgar, Ayal Schaffer, Sarah E MacLean, R Nicholas Carleton, Ian Colman, Navitha Jayakumar, Brooklyn Ward, Rabia Zaheer
{"title":"A Comparison of Suicides in Public Safety Personnel With Suicides in the General Population in Ontario, 2014 to 2018.","authors":"Simon Hatcher, Mark Sinyor, Nicole E Edgar, Ayal Schaffer, Sarah E MacLean, R Nicholas Carleton, Ian Colman, Navitha Jayakumar, Brooklyn Ward, Rabia Zaheer","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> There is conflicting evidence on the suicide rates of different public safety personnel (PSP). There have been few studies that compare suicides in PSP with the general population and none that have used a detailed comparison of coroner records. <i>Aims:</i> The current study estimates suicide rates among different PSP and compares PSP suicides with the general population. <i>Method:</i> We identified coroner records of PSP suicides from January 2014 to December 2018 and compared each one to two matched general population controls. <i>Results:</i> We identified 36 PSP suicides and 72 general population controls. Police had a higher suicide rate than other PSP groups. PSP were more likely to die by firearm, be separated/divorced or married, die in a motor vehicle, have problems at work, and have a PTSD diagnosis. PSP were less likely to die by jumping. <i>Limitations:</i> The study may have not identified all PSP suicides. Apart from the cause of death, data in coroner records are not systematically collected, so information may be incomplete. <i>Conclusion:</i> PSP suicides appear different than the general population. Death records need to have an occupation identifier to enable monitoring of trends in occupational groups, such as PSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"355-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is conflicting evidence on the suicide rates of different public safety personnel (PSP). There have been few studies that compare suicides in PSP with the general population and none that have used a detailed comparison of coroner records. Aims: The current study estimates suicide rates among different PSP and compares PSP suicides with the general population. Method: We identified coroner records of PSP suicides from January 2014 to December 2018 and compared each one to two matched general population controls. Results: We identified 36 PSP suicides and 72 general population controls. Police had a higher suicide rate than other PSP groups. PSP were more likely to die by firearm, be separated/divorced or married, die in a motor vehicle, have problems at work, and have a PTSD diagnosis. PSP were less likely to die by jumping. Limitations: The study may have not identified all PSP suicides. Apart from the cause of death, data in coroner records are not systematically collected, so information may be incomplete. Conclusion: PSP suicides appear different than the general population. Death records need to have an occupation identifier to enable monitoring of trends in occupational groups, such as PSP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014年至2018年安大略省公共安全人员自杀事件与普通人群自杀事件的比较》(A Comparison of Suicides in Public Safety Personnel With Suicides in General Population in Ontario, 2014 to 2018)。
背景:关于不同公共安全人员(PSP)的自杀率,存在相互矛盾的证据。很少有研究将公共安全人员的自杀率与普通人群进行比较,也没有研究对验尸官的记录进行详细比较。目的:本研究估计了不同公共安全人员的自杀率,并将公共安全人员的自杀情况与普通人群进行了比较。研究方法:我们确定了 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间 PSP 自杀者的验尸官记录,并将每个记录与两个匹配的普通人群对照进行了比较。结果:我们确定了 36 名 PSP 自杀者和 72 名普通人群对照。警察的自杀率高于其他 PSP 群体。PSP 更有可能死于枪支、分居/离婚或已婚、死于机动车、工作有问题以及被诊断患有创伤后应激障碍。PSP 不太可能死于跳楼。局限性:该研究可能没有识别出所有的 PSP 自杀者。除死因外,验尸官记录中的数据也没有得到系统收集,因此信息可能不完整。结论:PSP 自杀者似乎与普通人群有所不同。死亡记录需要有职业标识符,以便监测职业群体(如 PSP)的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
期刊最新文献
Testing the Three-Step Theory of Suicide. Holding the Line - Mental Well-Being, Stressors, and Coping in Crisis Supporters. Hidden in Plain Sight - Staff Exposure to Suicide and Responses to a New, Systemic Model of Workplace Postvention. The Prevalence of Suicidal Ideation According to Occupation and Other Employment Variables. Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1