Identifying physical therapists' attitudes, beliefs, and barriers toward diagnostic imaging referral: a mixed-methods study.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1080/10669817.2024.2346957
Matthew R Schumacher, Kendra A Karl, Mattias A Stich, Christopher R Dean, Sara R Lawson, Jason L Hogan
{"title":"Identifying physical therapists' attitudes, beliefs, and barriers toward diagnostic imaging referral: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Matthew R Schumacher, Kendra A Karl, Mattias A Stich, Christopher R Dean, Sara R Lawson, Jason L Hogan","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2024.2346957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ten states, including the District of Columbia, have laws that currently permit physical therapists (PTs) to directly order diagnostic imaging (DI) in the United States. Military and civilian PTs order DI judiciously and appropriately demonstrating optimal patient outcomes and satisfaction when compared to other medical professionals. However, no studies have explored perceived attitudes, beliefs, and barriers to PT DI referral specific to North Dakota (ND). Therefore, the purpose of this mixed-methods study was to identify ND PTs' attitudes, beliefs, and barriers toward DI referral.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 147 participants completed an online survey with a subset of 17 participants agreeing to an interview. Frequency counts of demographic data and perceived barriers were completed. A binary logistic regression was run on demographic data. One-on-one interviews were conducted with a thematic coding process completed within a qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four percent of PTs reported not currently referring for DI, although 71% felt that it would improve their patient outcomes. PTs with post-professional training (OR = 4.59), a doctorate degree (OR = 3.84), practicing in an orthopaedic or sports setting (OR = 3.55), and practicing within an urban setting of ND (OR = 3.01) were more likely to refer for DI. The main barriers identified in the survey included: (1) the logistics of performing a DI referral, (2) DI referrals only privileged to other medical providers, (3) provider/work relationship dynamics, (4) the cost of continuing education (CE), (5) and the inability to identify CE. One-on-one interviews further identified five main themes related to DI referral.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Several barriers identified resulted in 74.1% of PTs not directly referring for DI, although certain characteristics (post-professional training, doctorate degree, orthopaedic/sports setting, practicing in an urban area in ND) were more likely to refer for DI. This study may help improve future adoption and implementation of DI referral in current and future states.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"506-514"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2346957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Ten states, including the District of Columbia, have laws that currently permit physical therapists (PTs) to directly order diagnostic imaging (DI) in the United States. Military and civilian PTs order DI judiciously and appropriately demonstrating optimal patient outcomes and satisfaction when compared to other medical professionals. However, no studies have explored perceived attitudes, beliefs, and barriers to PT DI referral specific to North Dakota (ND). Therefore, the purpose of this mixed-methods study was to identify ND PTs' attitudes, beliefs, and barriers toward DI referral.

Methods: A total of 147 participants completed an online survey with a subset of 17 participants agreeing to an interview. Frequency counts of demographic data and perceived barriers were completed. A binary logistic regression was run on demographic data. One-on-one interviews were conducted with a thematic coding process completed within a qualitative analysis.

Results: Seventy-four percent of PTs reported not currently referring for DI, although 71% felt that it would improve their patient outcomes. PTs with post-professional training (OR = 4.59), a doctorate degree (OR = 3.84), practicing in an orthopaedic or sports setting (OR = 3.55), and practicing within an urban setting of ND (OR = 3.01) were more likely to refer for DI. The main barriers identified in the survey included: (1) the logistics of performing a DI referral, (2) DI referrals only privileged to other medical providers, (3) provider/work relationship dynamics, (4) the cost of continuing education (CE), (5) and the inability to identify CE. One-on-one interviews further identified five main themes related to DI referral.

Discussion/conclusion: Several barriers identified resulted in 74.1% of PTs not directly referring for DI, although certain characteristics (post-professional training, doctorate degree, orthopaedic/sports setting, practicing in an urban area in ND) were more likely to refer for DI. This study may help improve future adoption and implementation of DI referral in current and future states.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定物理治疗师对诊断成像转诊的态度、信念和障碍:一项混合方法研究。
目的:在美国,包括哥伦比亚特区在内的十个州的法律目前允许物理治疗师(PTs)直接下达诊断成像(DI)指令。与其他医疗专业人员相比,军事和民事物理治疗师可明智、适当地开具诊断成像单,并显示出最佳的患者治疗效果和满意度。然而,目前还没有研究探讨北达科他州(ND)的PT DI转诊的认知态度、信念和障碍。因此,这项混合方法研究的目的是确定北达科他州护理人员对 DI 转诊的态度、信念和障碍:共有 147 名参与者完成了在线调查,其中 17 名参与者同意接受访谈。完成了人口统计学数据和感知障碍的频率统计。对人口统计学数据进行了二元逻辑回归。进行了一对一访谈,并在定性分析中完成了主题编码过程:74%的康复治疗师表示目前没有转诊DI,尽管71%的康复治疗师认为这将改善他们的患者治疗效果。受过专业后培训(OR = 4.59)、拥有博士学位(OR = 3.84)、在矫形外科或运动场所执业(OR = 3.55)以及在北达科他州的城市环境中执业(OR = 3.01)的康复治疗师更有可能转诊DI。调查中发现的主要障碍包括(1)进行DI转诊的后勤工作,(2)DI转诊只提供给其他医疗服务提供者,(3)医疗服务提供者/工作关系动态,(4)继续教育(CE)的费用,(5)无法确定CE。一对一访谈进一步确定了与 DI 转诊有关的五大主题:尽管某些特征(专业后培训、博士学位、矫形/运动环境、在北达科他州的城市地区执业)更有可能转介 DI,但所发现的几个障碍导致 74.1%的康复治疗师没有直接转介 DI。这项研究可能有助于改善当前和未来各州对 DI 转诊的采用和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of manual therapy for sacroiliac joint pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Recognition of a patient with neck autonomic dysfunction: findings from a rare case report of harlequin syndrome in direct access physiotherapy. Autonomic nervous system and endocrine system response to upper or lower cervical spine mobilization in males with persistent post-concussion symptoms: a proof-of-concept trial. Management of concussion symptoms utilizing Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy: a case series. Differences in physical examination findings between those who present with or without headache soon after a whiplash injury: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1