From statistics to stories: understanding the complex landscape of missed medical appointments.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0007
Lea Charton, Francis Gatier, Chloe Delacour, Camille Lépine
{"title":"From statistics to stories: understanding the complex landscape of missed medical appointments.","authors":"Lea Charton, Francis Gatier, Chloe Delacour, Camille Lépine","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research suggests that in both France and the UK, between 5 to 10% of appointments with General Practitioners (GPs) are unattended. A comprehensive Irish study linked missed appointments with an increased short-term risk of mortality, prompting further investigation into the reasons behind absenteeism.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study seeks to delve into the underlying causes of missed appointments, within the context of an urban health center.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Using a mixed-method approach, this study combines qualitative telephone interviews with quantitative analysis of medical records. The research focuses on patients who failed to attend appointments at an urban health center over a 15-day period.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The interview guide collected data on circumstances leading to missed appointments and explored patients' social determinants of health. Additionally, patients' socio-economic backgrounds was undertaken of medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 53 missed appointments (4.9% of all scheduled), 22 patients were interviewed. SHC beneficiaries (68% of the sample) cited socio-economic instability, including precarious work hours, social isolation, and multiple commitments, as reasons for non-attendance. For non-SHC beneficiaries, forgetfulness was the main cause. Remarkably, 36% disclosed a history of domestic violence. Retrospective analysis by physicians deemed over a quarter of these missed appointments as significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that missed appointments can highlight social inequality, emphasising the need to align healthcare with patients' temporal realities. The identification of patients who have experienced violence and the use of missed appointments as triggers for follow-up calls seems to be promising strategies to enhance care and mitigate health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research suggests that in both France and the UK, between 5 to 10% of appointments with General Practitioners (GPs) are unattended. A comprehensive Irish study linked missed appointments with an increased short-term risk of mortality, prompting further investigation into the reasons behind absenteeism.

Aim: This study seeks to delve into the underlying causes of missed appointments, within the context of an urban health center.

Design & setting: Using a mixed-method approach, this study combines qualitative telephone interviews with quantitative analysis of medical records. The research focuses on patients who failed to attend appointments at an urban health center over a 15-day period.

Method: The interview guide collected data on circumstances leading to missed appointments and explored patients' social determinants of health. Additionally, patients' socio-economic backgrounds was undertaken of medical records.

Results: Among 53 missed appointments (4.9% of all scheduled), 22 patients were interviewed. SHC beneficiaries (68% of the sample) cited socio-economic instability, including precarious work hours, social isolation, and multiple commitments, as reasons for non-attendance. For non-SHC beneficiaries, forgetfulness was the main cause. Remarkably, 36% disclosed a history of domestic violence. Retrospective analysis by physicians deemed over a quarter of these missed appointments as significant.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that missed appointments can highlight social inequality, emphasising the need to align healthcare with patients' temporal realities. The identification of patients who have experienced violence and the use of missed appointments as triggers for follow-up calls seems to be promising strategies to enhance care and mitigate health inequalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从统计数据到故事:了解错过就诊的复杂情况。
背景:研究表明,在法国和英国,有5%至10%的全科医生(GPs)预约是无人接诊的。爱尔兰的一项综合研究将失约与短期死亡风险增加联系在一起,促使人们进一步调查缺席背后的原因。目的:本研究试图在城市医疗中心的背景下,深入探讨失约的根本原因:本研究采用混合方法,将定性电话访谈与定量病历分析相结合。研究的重点是 15 天内未到城市医疗中心就诊的病人:访谈指南收集了有关导致失约情况的数据,并探讨了患者的健康社会决定因素。此外,还通过医疗记录了解了患者的社会经济背景:在 53 名失约者(占所有预约者的 4.9%)中,有 22 名患者接受了访谈。特别健康计划受益人(占样本的 68%)认为社会经济不稳定,包括工作时间不稳定、社会孤立和有多项承诺,是他们未赴约的原因。对于非 SHC 受益人来说,健忘是主要原因。值得注意的是,有 36% 的人披露了家庭暴力史。医生进行的回顾性分析认为,超过四分之一的失约具有重要意义:研究结果表明,失约会凸显社会不平等,强调医疗保健必须与患者的时间现实相一致。识别遭受过暴力的患者并将失约作为后续电话的触发因素,似乎是加强医疗服务和减少健康不平等的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Exploring the facilitators and barriers to addressing social media's impact on anxiety within primary care: a qualitative study. Action on elevated natriuretic peptide in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study. 'ThinkCancer!': randomised feasibility trial of a novel practice-based early cancer diagnosis intervention. Signs and symptoms of serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to ambulatory care: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1