Gründe für die Nichtteilnahme an einer Patientenbefragung im Kontext der prähospitalen Notfallversorgung durch Gemeindenotfallsanitäter - eine retrospektive Beobachtungsstudie

Abstract

Background

In order to evaluate whether the new rescue means “community emergency paramedics” (Gemeindenotfallsanitäter [G-NFS]) relieves the emergency medical service (EMS) in the care of low-priority emergencies, the perspective of general practitioners and patients was also surveyed in a written questionnaire as part of an innovation fund project. Recruitment for participation in the study proved to be difficult. The aim of this study is to evaluate why the G-NFS decided against providing information on study participation and what measures would be necessary to include more emergency patients in surveys in the future.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the assignment protocols from April 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022. In addition to patient characteristics, data on treatments, interventions and recommendations to patients as well as reasons for non-participation in the patient survey were collected.

Results

5,395 G-NFS protocols that contained information on non-participation were included in the analysis. The average age of the patients was 62.4 years (SD 22.7), and 50.2 % were female. 57.4 % of the cases were categorised as non-urgent, and 35.2 % of the cases required an additional ambulance to be alerted. 404 (7.5 %) patients used the EMS more than once, 1,120 (20.8 %) did not have sufficient language skills, 1,012 (18.8 %) patients declined study participation, and 2,975 (55.1 %) patients were not able to participate according to the G-NFS assessment. Dementia/neurocognitive impairment (35 %), acute/emergency situation (26.5 %), mental health impairment (10.3 %), and substance abuse (6.5 %) were given as reasons for non-participation from the G-NFS perspective.

Discussion

The results show that more than half of the patients were unable to take part in a written survey for various reasons, even though there was no need for urgent care. This could be due to a high demand for care and the complex consent procedure. In addition, further resources are required to provide needs-based care for these patients in order to relieve the burden on emergency medical care. Over half of the patients were unable to take part in a written survey for various reasons. Further research is needed to determine what consent procedures are appropriate to facilitate patients’ study participation.