The Effect of Temperament on Outcomes of Opioid and Non-Opioid Pediatric Dental Sedation.

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN Pub Date : 2024-01-15
Raymond Lee, Kathie Wang, Anna Forsyth, Mariella Garcia, Joanna Scott, Travis Nelson
{"title":"The Effect of Temperament on Outcomes of Opioid and Non-Opioid Pediatric Dental Sedation.","authors":"Raymond Lee, Kathie Wang, Anna Forsyth, Mariella Garcia, Joanna Scott, Travis Nelson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To assess oral sedation success using midazolam and hydroxyzine with and without meperidine, and to assess the relationship between child temperament and sedation outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> This study recruited children between the ages of 36 and 95 months who were randomly assigned to receive dental treatment with an oral sedation regimen of midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and hydroxyzine (1.0 mg/kg) with or without meperidine (1.5 mg/kg). Data were collected from the treatment log and electronic health records. Parents completed the Child Behavior Questionnaire Short Form (CBQ-SF) to assess temperament. <b>Results:</b> The study included 37 participants. The overall treatment success rate was 54 percent. There were no significant differences in sedation outcome with age, sex, insurance status, sedation regimen, isolation method or duration of procedure. Children with high pre-operative Frankl behavioral ratings were more likely to have a successful sedation outcome (<i>P</i> <0.01). Children who displayed high soothability experienced higher rates of success (<i>P</i> =0.04), which was more pronounced in the non-opioid group (<i>P</i> <0.01). <b>Conclusion:</b> The study showed low rates of success for a relatively small sample size. There was no difference in sedation success between the opioid group and non-opioid group. However, pre-procedure behavior and temperament characteristic of sooth- ability may warrant more exploration as predictors of sedation success.</p>","PeriodicalId":51605,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess oral sedation success using midazolam and hydroxyzine with and without meperidine, and to assess the relationship between child temperament and sedation outcomes. Methods: This study recruited children between the ages of 36 and 95 months who were randomly assigned to receive dental treatment with an oral sedation regimen of midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and hydroxyzine (1.0 mg/kg) with or without meperidine (1.5 mg/kg). Data were collected from the treatment log and electronic health records. Parents completed the Child Behavior Questionnaire Short Form (CBQ-SF) to assess temperament. Results: The study included 37 participants. The overall treatment success rate was 54 percent. There were no significant differences in sedation outcome with age, sex, insurance status, sedation regimen, isolation method or duration of procedure. Children with high pre-operative Frankl behavioral ratings were more likely to have a successful sedation outcome (P <0.01). Children who displayed high soothability experienced higher rates of success (P =0.04), which was more pronounced in the non-opioid group (P <0.01). Conclusion: The study showed low rates of success for a relatively small sample size. There was no difference in sedation success between the opioid group and non-opioid group. However, pre-procedure behavior and temperament characteristic of sooth- ability may warrant more exploration as predictors of sedation success.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气质对阿片类和非阿片类儿童牙科镇静剂疗效的影响。
目的:评估使用咪达唑仑和羟嗪加或不加甲哌丁进行口服镇静的成功率,并评估儿童气质与镇静结果之间的关系。研究方法本研究招募了年龄在 36 到 95 个月之间的儿童,随机分配他们使用咪达唑仑(0.5 毫克/千克)和羟嗪(1.0 毫克/千克)口服镇静方案接受牙科治疗,同时使用或不使用麦皮利定(1.5 毫克/千克)。数据收集自治疗日志和电子健康记录。家长填写了儿童行为问卷简表(CBQ-SF)以评估性情。研究结果本研究共有 37 名参与者。总体治疗成功率为 54%。镇静效果与年龄、性别、保险状况、镇静方案、隔离方法或手术持续时间无明显差异。研究显示,样本量相对较小的成功率较低。阿片类药物组和非阿片类药物组的镇静成功率没有差异。不过,作为镇静成功率的预测因素,可能需要对手术前行为和舒缓能力的气质特征进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Acquired after the merger between the American Society of Dentistry for Children and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry in 2002, the Journal of Dentistry for Children (JDC) is an internationally renowned journal whose publishing dates back to 1934. Published three times a year, JDC promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. It covers a wide range of topics related to the clinical care of children, from clinical techniques of daily importance to the practitioner, to studies on child behavior and growth and development. JDC also provides information on the physical, psychological and emotional conditions of children as they relate to and affect their dental health.
期刊最新文献
Acceptance of Behavior Guidance Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry Between American and Colombian Parents. Angioleiomyomatous Hamartoma of Incisive Papilla in an Adolescent. Caregivers' Perceptions of Dental Therapists. Clinical Implications of Temporomandibular Condyle Agenesis in a Toddler. COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Behavioral and Attitudinal Changes in Caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1