Biologic therapies in stress fractures: Current concepts.

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jisako.2024.04.008
George Jacob, Kazunori Shimomura, Norimasa Nakamura
{"title":"Biologic therapies in stress fractures: Current concepts.","authors":"George Jacob, Kazunori Shimomura, Norimasa Nakamura","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stress fractures, a common overuse injury in physically active individuals, present a significant challenge for athletes and military personnel. Patients who sustain stress fractures have demanding training regimes where periods of rest and immobilisation have unacceptable negative consequences on sports goals and finances. Aside from being an overuse injury, there are various contributing risk factors that put certain individuals at risk of a stress fracture. The main two being nutritional deficiencies and hormonal variations, which have significant effects on bone metabolism and turnover. Historically, treatment of stress fractures focused on conservative strategies such as rest and immobilisation. Calcium and vitamin D deficiencies have been closely linked to stress fractures and so over time supplementation has also played a role in treatment. With the introduction of biologics into orthopaedics, newer treatment strategies have been applied to accelerate fracture healing and perhaps improve fracture callus quality. If such therapies can reduce time spent away from sport and activity, it would be ideal for treating stress fractures. This article aims to offer insights into the evolving landscape of stress fracture management. It investigates the pre-clinical evidence and available published clinical applications. Though fracture healing is well understood, the role of biologics for fracture healing is still indeterminate. Available literature for the use of biologic therapies in stress fractures are restricted and most reports have used biologics as a supplement to surgical fixation in subjects in studies that lack control groups. Randomised control trials have been proposed and registered by a few groups, with results awaited. Assessing individuals for risk factors, addressing hormonal imbalances and nutritional deficiencies seems like an effective approach to addressing the burden of stress fractures. We await better designed trials and studies to accurately determine the clinical benefit of adding biologics to the management of these injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.04.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress fractures, a common overuse injury in physically active individuals, present a significant challenge for athletes and military personnel. Patients who sustain stress fractures have demanding training regimes where periods of rest and immobilisation have unacceptable negative consequences on sports goals and finances. Aside from being an overuse injury, there are various contributing risk factors that put certain individuals at risk of a stress fracture. The main two being nutritional deficiencies and hormonal variations, which have significant effects on bone metabolism and turnover. Historically, treatment of stress fractures focused on conservative strategies such as rest and immobilisation. Calcium and vitamin D deficiencies have been closely linked to stress fractures and so over time supplementation has also played a role in treatment. With the introduction of biologics into orthopaedics, newer treatment strategies have been applied to accelerate fracture healing and perhaps improve fracture callus quality. If such therapies can reduce time spent away from sport and activity, it would be ideal for treating stress fractures. This article aims to offer insights into the evolving landscape of stress fracture management. It investigates the pre-clinical evidence and available published clinical applications. Though fracture healing is well understood, the role of biologics for fracture healing is still indeterminate. Available literature for the use of biologic therapies in stress fractures are restricted and most reports have used biologics as a supplement to surgical fixation in subjects in studies that lack control groups. Randomised control trials have been proposed and registered by a few groups, with results awaited. Assessing individuals for risk factors, addressing hormonal imbalances and nutritional deficiencies seems like an effective approach to addressing the burden of stress fractures. We await better designed trials and studies to accurately determine the clinical benefit of adding biologics to the management of these injuries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应力性骨折的生物疗法:当前概念。
应力性骨折是体力活动者常见的过度劳损,对运动员和军人来说是一项重大挑战。发生应力性骨折的患者需要进行高强度的训练,休息和固定的时间会对运动目标和经济产生不可接受的负面影响。应力性骨折除了是一种过度劳损外,还有各种风险因素导致某些人面临应力性骨折的风险。其中最主要的两个因素是营养缺乏和荷尔蒙变化,它们对骨质代谢和新陈代谢有重大影响。从历史上看,应力性骨折的治疗主要采用保守疗法,如休息和固定。钙和维生素 D 的缺乏与应力性骨折密切相关,因此随着时间的推移,补充剂也在治疗中发挥了作用。随着生物制剂被引入骨科,更新的治疗策略被应用于加速骨折愈合,或许还能改善骨折胼胝的质量。如果这些疗法能缩短患者离开运动和活动的时间,那么它将成为治疗应力性骨折的理想选择。本文旨在深入探讨应力性骨折治疗的演变。文章对临床前证据和已发表的临床应用进行了研究。虽然人们对骨折愈合有了充分的认识,但生物制剂在骨折愈合中的作用仍不确定。关于应力性骨折使用生物制剂疗法的现有文献十分有限,大多数报告都是在缺乏对照组的研究中将生物制剂作为手术固定的补充。少数研究小组提出并登记了随机对照试验,结果尚待公布。评估个人风险因素、解决荷尔蒙失调和营养缺乏问题似乎是解决应力性骨折负担的有效方法。我们正等待设计更完善的试验和研究,以准确确定在这些损伤的治疗中添加生物制剂的临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
期刊最新文献
RESPONSE TO ''LETTER TO EDITOR'. Mobile App-Based Monitoring of Recovery After Knee Osteotomy: Patients Take Approximately Five Months to Return to Preoperative Step Counts Despite Limited App Uptake. Return to Sport after First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis in Elite Athletes. Fixation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Leads to Successful Clinical Outcomes in 9 out of 10 Patients: a Systematic Review. The Coraco-Gleno-Scapular Line and Assessing Glenoid Bone Defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1