Biomechanical strength of triceps tendon repairs: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of human cadaveric studies.

Abstract

Purpose: It is unclear which triceps tendon repair constructs and techniques produce the strongest biomechanical performance while minimizing the risk of gap formation and repair failure. We aimed to determine associations of construct and technique variables with the biomechanical strength of triceps tendon repairs. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for peer-reviewed studies on biomechanical strength of triceps tendon repairs in human cadavers. 6 articles met the search criteria. Meta-regression was performed on the pooled dataset (123 specimens). Outcomes of interest included gap formation, failure mode, and ultimate failure load. Covariates were fixation type; number of implants; and number of sutures. Stratification by covariates was performed. We found no association between fixation type and ultimate failure load; however, suture anchor fixation was associated with less gap formation compared with transosseous direct repair (β =  - 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]:- 2.2, - 0.04). A greater number of implants was associated with smaller gap formation (β = - 0.77; 95% CI: - 1.3, - 0.28) while a greater number of sutures was associated with higher ultimate failure load ( β= 3; 95% CI: 21, 125). In human cadaveric models, the number of sutures used in triceps tendon repairs may be more important than the fixation type or number of implants for overall strength. If using a transosseous direct repair approach to repair triceps tendon tears, surgeons may choose to use more sutures in their repair in order to balance the risk of larger gap formation when compared to indirect repair techniques.

Level of evidence: Level III.