Abstinence for sperm sample collection and ART outcome: an unsubstantiated myth.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000946
Peter N Schlegel
{"title":"Abstinence for sperm sample collection and ART outcome: an unsubstantiated myth.","authors":"Peter N Schlegel","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Semen analysis is a basic component of male evaluation. Reproductive centers typically instruct men to provide a semen specimen based on recommendations from WHO Standard for semen examination. Evidence that these recommendations optimize sperm reproductive capacity is lacking. Existing data to optimize sperm quality with shorter abstinence were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several recent studies have reviewed the effects of shorter ejaculatory abstinence of semen quality and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes. Shorter abstinence was defined as 1 h-1 day in one review, and <4 h in the other systematic meta-analysis and review.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Prior instructions for male patients have not been designed to optimize fertility potential for semen analyses. Optimal sperm quality is obtained by instructing men to have a short abstinence (certainly <1 day, and preferably <4 h) for semen specimens used for in vitro fertilization (assisted reproduction).</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Semen analysis is a basic component of male evaluation. Reproductive centers typically instruct men to provide a semen specimen based on recommendations from WHO Standard for semen examination. Evidence that these recommendations optimize sperm reproductive capacity is lacking. Existing data to optimize sperm quality with shorter abstinence were reviewed.

Recent findings: Several recent studies have reviewed the effects of shorter ejaculatory abstinence of semen quality and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes. Shorter abstinence was defined as 1 h-1 day in one review, and <4 h in the other systematic meta-analysis and review.

Summary: Prior instructions for male patients have not been designed to optimize fertility potential for semen analyses. Optimal sperm quality is obtained by instructing men to have a short abstinence (certainly <1 day, and preferably <4 h) for semen specimens used for in vitro fertilization (assisted reproduction).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
禁欲采集精子样本与抗逆转录病毒疗法的结果:一个未经证实的神话。
审查目的:精液分析是男性评估的基本组成部分。生殖中心通常会根据世界卫生组织精液检查标准的建议指导男性提供精液标本。但缺乏证据表明这些建议能优化精子的生殖能力。我们回顾了通过缩短禁欲时间来优化精子质量的现有数据:最近的几项研究回顾了缩短射精禁欲期对精液质量和辅助生殖技术(ART)结果的影响。一篇综述将禁欲时间定义为1小时-1天,另一篇综述将禁欲时间定义为1小时-1天,综述总结:之前对男性患者的指导并不是为了优化精液分析的生育潜力。通过指导男性短期禁欲(当然是在禁欲期间),可以获得最佳的精子质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing equity in cervical screening - initiatives to increase screening participation. Expanding access to postpartum contraception. New management approaches for female sexual dysfunction. No test medical abortion - a review of the evidence on selective use of preabortion testing. Providing adolescent-friendly sexually transmitted infection screening and treatment services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1