Getting cozy with causality: Advances to the causal pathway diagramming method to enhance implementation precision.

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2024-04-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895241248851
Predrag Klasnja, Rosemary D Meza, Michael D Pullmann, Kayne D Mettert, Rene Hawkes, Lorella Palazzo, Bryan J Weiner, Cara C Lewis
{"title":"Getting cozy with causality: Advances to the causal pathway diagramming method to enhance implementation precision.","authors":"Predrag Klasnja, Rosemary D Meza, Michael D Pullmann, Kayne D Mettert, Rene Hawkes, Lorella Palazzo, Bryan J Weiner, Cara C Lewis","doi":"10.1177/26334895241248851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementation strategies are theorized to work well when carefully matched to implementation determinants and when factors-preconditions, moderators, etc.-that influence strategy effectiveness are prospectively identified and addressed. Existing methods for strategy selection are either imprecise or require significant technical expertise and resources, undermining their utility. This article outlines refinements to causal pathway diagrams (CPDs), a method for articulating the causal process through which implementation strategies work and offers illustrations of their use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>CPDs are a visualization tool to represent an implementation strategy, its mechanism(s) (i.e., the processes through which a strategy is thought to operate), determinants it is intended to address, factors that may impede or facilitate its effectiveness, and the series of outcomes that should be expected if the strategy is operating as intended. We offer principles for constructing CPDs and describe their key functions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applications of the CPD method by study teams from two National Institute of Health-funded Implementation Science Centers and a research grant are presented. These include the use of CPDs to (a) match implementation strategies to determinants, (b) understand the conditions under which an implementation strategy works, and (c) develop causal theories of implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CPDs offer a novel method for implementers to select, understand, and improve the effectiveness of implementation strategies. They make explicit theoretical assumptions about strategy operation while supporting practical planning. Early applications have led to method refinements and guidance for the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"26334895241248851"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11062231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895241248851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implementation strategies are theorized to work well when carefully matched to implementation determinants and when factors-preconditions, moderators, etc.-that influence strategy effectiveness are prospectively identified and addressed. Existing methods for strategy selection are either imprecise or require significant technical expertise and resources, undermining their utility. This article outlines refinements to causal pathway diagrams (CPDs), a method for articulating the causal process through which implementation strategies work and offers illustrations of their use.

Method: CPDs are a visualization tool to represent an implementation strategy, its mechanism(s) (i.e., the processes through which a strategy is thought to operate), determinants it is intended to address, factors that may impede or facilitate its effectiveness, and the series of outcomes that should be expected if the strategy is operating as intended. We offer principles for constructing CPDs and describe their key functions.

Results: Applications of the CPD method by study teams from two National Institute of Health-funded Implementation Science Centers and a research grant are presented. These include the use of CPDs to (a) match implementation strategies to determinants, (b) understand the conditions under which an implementation strategy works, and (c) develop causal theories of implementation strategies.

Conclusions: CPDs offer a novel method for implementers to select, understand, and improve the effectiveness of implementation strategies. They make explicit theoretical assumptions about strategy operation while supporting practical planning. Early applications have led to method refinements and guidance for the field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与因果关系亲密接触:推进因果路径图法,提高实施精度。
背景:根据理论,当实施战略与实施的决定因素仔细匹配时,当影响战略有效性的因素--前提条件、调节因素等--被前瞻性地识别和处理时,实施战略就会发挥良好的作用。现有的策略选择方法要么不精确,要么需要大量的专业技术知识和资源,因而削弱了其效用。本文概述了对因果路径图(CPDs)的改进,CPDs 是一种阐明实施战略发挥作用的因果过程的方法,并提供了使用示例:因果路径图是一种可视化工具,用于表示实施战略、其机制(即认为战略通过其运作的过程)、旨在解决的决定因素、可能阻碍或促进其有效性的因素,以及如果战略按预期运作所应预期的一系列结果。我们提出了构建 CPD 的原则,并描述了 CPD 的主要功能:结果:介绍了由美国国家卫生研究院资助的两个实施科学中心和一个研究基金的研究小组对 CPD 方法的应用。这些应用包括使用 CPD (a) 将实施策略与决定因素相匹配,(b) 了解实施策略发挥作用的条件,以及 (c) 发展实施策略的因果理论:国家方案文件为实施者选择、理解和改进实施战略的有效性提供了一种新方法。它们明确了战略运作的理论假设,同时支持实际规划。早期的应用为该领域提供了方法改进和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a pilot implementation of a digital cognitive behavioral therapy platform for isolated older adults in county mental health services. Calculating power for multilevel implementation trials in mental health: Meaningful effect sizes, intraclass correlation coefficients, and proportions of variance explained by covariates. Preparation for implementation of evidence-based practices in urban schools: A shared process with implementing partners. Are we being equitable enough? Lessons learned from sites lost in an implementation trial. Examining implementation determinants of a culturally grounded, school-based prevention curriculum in rural Hawai'i: A test development and validation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1