Pattern of Acute Adverse Transfusion Reactions in Patients With Burn Injuries: A Novel Initiative Towards Haemovigilance at the National Burn Centre of Pakistan.

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2023-09-30 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01
M Rehan, T Iqbal, M Sarwar, M S Khan, M H Tariq, Q Ain, U Waheed
{"title":"Pattern of Acute Adverse Transfusion Reactions in Patients With Burn Injuries: A Novel Initiative Towards Haemovigilance at the National Burn Centre of Pakistan.","authors":"M Rehan, T Iqbal, M Sarwar, M S Khan, M H Tariq, Q Ain, U Waheed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The transfusion of blood and blood components is a life-saving medical procedure, however, it is linked with adverse reactions to transfusions. Information about different types of adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) will assist in their early identification and subsequent management, as well as in devising strategies to minimize the occurrence of adverse reactions related to blood component transfusion. The current study was therefore executed to analyze the pattern of ATRs in patients with burn injuries at a national burn center. This was a cross-sectional, prospective study involving an analysis of immediate ATRs from January 2020 to June 2021 (18 months). ATRs observed during the study period were documented and analyzed. During the study period, 2,220 units of blood and blood components were transfused to 1,075 burn patients (2.06 transfusions per patient). A total of 27 ATRs were recorded (1.21%). Allergic reactions were the commonest (55.55%) followed by febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reaction (37.03%). The mean volume of blood unit transfused, when the reactions were noted, was approximately 75 ml (range: 15-230 ml). The mean time at which transfusion reactions were noted was 17 min (range: 5-220 minutes). The ATRs were more common in patients with multiple transfusions compared to those receiving a single transfusion. The common adverse reactions were allergic and febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reactions. It is vital to report all transfusion reactions to the attached blood center and hospital transfusion committee (HTC) on standardized reporting forms. Continuous medical education through seminars and sensitization workshops will support consolidating haemovigilance systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"36 3","pages":"261-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transfusion of blood and blood components is a life-saving medical procedure, however, it is linked with adverse reactions to transfusions. Information about different types of adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) will assist in their early identification and subsequent management, as well as in devising strategies to minimize the occurrence of adverse reactions related to blood component transfusion. The current study was therefore executed to analyze the pattern of ATRs in patients with burn injuries at a national burn center. This was a cross-sectional, prospective study involving an analysis of immediate ATRs from January 2020 to June 2021 (18 months). ATRs observed during the study period were documented and analyzed. During the study period, 2,220 units of blood and blood components were transfused to 1,075 burn patients (2.06 transfusions per patient). A total of 27 ATRs were recorded (1.21%). Allergic reactions were the commonest (55.55%) followed by febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reaction (37.03%). The mean volume of blood unit transfused, when the reactions were noted, was approximately 75 ml (range: 15-230 ml). The mean time at which transfusion reactions were noted was 17 min (range: 5-220 minutes). The ATRs were more common in patients with multiple transfusions compared to those receiving a single transfusion. The common adverse reactions were allergic and febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reactions. It is vital to report all transfusion reactions to the attached blood center and hospital transfusion committee (HTC) on standardized reporting forms. Continuous medical education through seminars and sensitization workshops will support consolidating haemovigilance systems.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烧伤患者的急性不良输血反应模式:巴基斯坦国家烧伤中心血液警戒新举措》。
输血和血液成分是挽救生命的医疗程序,但也与输血不良反应有关。有关不同类型输血不良反应(ATRs)的信息将有助于及早发现和处理这些不良反应,并有助于制定策略以尽量减少与输血有关的不良反应的发生。因此,本研究旨在分析国家烧伤中心烧伤患者的输血不良反应模式。这是一项横断面前瞻性研究,涉及对 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月(18 个月)期间的即时 ATR 进行分析。对研究期间观察到的 ATR 进行了记录和分析。研究期间,共为 1,075 名烧伤患者输注了 2,220 单位的血液和血液成分(每名患者输血 2.06 次)。共记录了 27 例 ATR(1.21%)。最常见的是过敏反应(55.55%),其次是发热性非溶血性输血反应(37.03%)。出现反应时的平均输血量约为 75 毫升(范围:15-230 毫升)。发现输血反应的平均时间为 17 分钟(范围:5-220 分钟)。与接受单次输血的患者相比,多次输血的患者更容易出现输血不良反应。常见的不良反应是过敏性和发热性非溶血性输血反应。使用标准报告表向附属血液中心和医院输血委员会(HTC)报告所有输血反应至关重要。通过研讨会和宣传讲习班开展持续的医学教育将有助于巩固血液监测系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[ATTEMPTED SUICIDE BY SELF-IMMOLATION IN TUNISIA: 11 YEARS AFTER THE REVOLUTION]. [VENOUS THROMBO-EMBOLISM IN BURNS: INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS]. AN OUTBREAK OF EXTENSIVELY DRUG-RESISTANT ACINETOBACTER BAUMANNII IN A BELGIAN TERTIARY BURN WOUND CENTER. ANALYSIS OF ELECTRICAL BURNS IN ALBANIA: A FOUR-YEAR REVIEW. BACTERIAL NANOCELLULOSE DRESSING COMPARED WITH HYDROCOLLOID DRESSING FOR THE TREATMENT OF PARTIAL-THICKNESS SECOND-DEGREE BURNS: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1