The efficacy of coaxial percutaneous iodine-125 seed implantation combined with arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

HongXiang Yao, Ying ZhuGe, ShiXiang Jin, ShuiBing Chen, HengYiTing Zhang, Dong Zhang, ZhiGang Chen
{"title":"The efficacy of coaxial percutaneous iodine-125 seed implantation combined with arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"HongXiang Yao, Ying ZhuGe, ShiXiang Jin, ShuiBing Chen, HengYiTing Zhang, Dong Zhang, ZhiGang Chen","doi":"10.1080/09553002.2024.2347357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of coaxial percutaneous Iodine-125 (<sup>125</sup>I) seed implantation in combination with arterial infusion chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) through a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 101 patients with advanced PC were randomized into two groups: control group treated with systemic intravenous chemotherapy and experimental group that received <sup>125</sup>I seed implantation in combination with arterial infusion chemotherapy. Outcomes, including tumor control, abdominal pain relief, and survival time were compared between these two groups (Trial Registration No. KYKT2018-65).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pretreatment abdominal pain scores were comparable between the two groups, whereas the abdominal pain scores at 1- and 3-month post-treatment were significantly lower in the control group than those in the experimental group (1-month: 3.74 ± 1.54 <i>vs.</i> 4.48 ± 1.46, <i>p</i> = .015; 3-month: 3.64 ± 2.21 <i>vs.</i> 5.40 ± 1.56, <i>p</i> < .001). At 3-month post-treatment, computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a significantly higher disease control rate in the experimental group than that in the control group (94.0% <i>vs.</i> 74.5%, <i>p</i> = .007). The median survival time in the experimental group was significantly longer than that in the control group (15-month <i>vs.</i> 9-month, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of coaxial percutaneous <sup>125</sup>I seed implantation with arterial infusion chemotherapy could significantly alleviate abdominal pain, improve tumor control rates, and prolong survival time in patients with advanced PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94057,"journal":{"name":"International journal of radiation biology","volume":" ","pages":"1041-1050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of radiation biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2024.2347357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of coaxial percutaneous Iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation in combination with arterial infusion chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) through a randomized controlled trial.

Methods: A total of 101 patients with advanced PC were randomized into two groups: control group treated with systemic intravenous chemotherapy and experimental group that received 125I seed implantation in combination with arterial infusion chemotherapy. Outcomes, including tumor control, abdominal pain relief, and survival time were compared between these two groups (Trial Registration No. KYKT2018-65).

Results: Pretreatment abdominal pain scores were comparable between the two groups, whereas the abdominal pain scores at 1- and 3-month post-treatment were significantly lower in the control group than those in the experimental group (1-month: 3.74 ± 1.54 vs. 4.48 ± 1.46, p = .015; 3-month: 3.64 ± 2.21 vs. 5.40 ± 1.56, p < .001). At 3-month post-treatment, computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a significantly higher disease control rate in the experimental group than that in the control group (94.0% vs. 74.5%, p = .007). The median survival time in the experimental group was significantly longer than that in the control group (15-month vs. 9-month, p < .001).

Conclusion: The combination of coaxial percutaneous 125I seed implantation with arterial infusion chemotherapy could significantly alleviate abdominal pain, improve tumor control rates, and prolong survival time in patients with advanced PC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同轴经皮碘-125粒子植入联合动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效:随机临床试验。
研究背景本研究旨在通过随机对照试验评估同轴经皮碘-125(125I)粒子植入联合动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌(PC)的临床疗效:共有101名晚期胰腺癌患者被随机分为两组:对照组接受全身静脉化疗,实验组接受125I粒子植入联合动脉灌注化疗。对两组患者的肿瘤控制、腹痛缓解和生存时间等结果进行比较(试验登记号:KYKT2018-65):结果:两组患者治疗前的腹痛评分相当,而治疗后1个月和3个月的腹痛评分,对照组明显低于实验组(1个月:3.74 ± 1.54 vs 3.74 ± 1.54):1 个月:3.74 ± 1.54 vs. 4.48 ± 1.46,p = .015;3 个月3.64 ± 2.21 vs. 5.40 ± 1.56,p vs. 74.5%,p = .007)。实验组的中位生存时间明显长于对照组(15 个月 vs. 9 个月,p 结论:实验组的中位生存时间明显长于对照组(15 个月 vs. 9 个月):同轴经皮 125I 粒子植入联合动脉灌注化疗可明显缓解晚期 PC 患者的腹痛,提高肿瘤控制率,延长生存时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
γ-Radiations induced phytoconstituents variability in the grains of cultivated buckwheat species of Himalayan region. IEPA, a novel radiation countermeasure, alleviates acute radiation syndrome in rodents. Isolation and characterization of gamma rays induced mutants for improved agro-morphological performance and harder grain texture in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Advantages of single high-dose radiation therapy compared with conventional fractionated radiation therapy in overcoming radioresistance. Technetium-99m radiolabeling of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) as a new probe for glioblastoma tumor imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1