Tobacco and nicotine use among active component U.S. military service members: a comparison of 2018 estimates from the Health Related Behaviors Survey and the Periodic Health Assessment.

Q3 Medicine MSMR Pub Date : 2024-03-20
James D Mancuso, Anwar E Ahmed, Kristen R Rossi
{"title":"Tobacco and nicotine use among active component U.S. military service members: a comparison of 2018 estimates from the Health Related Behaviors Survey and the Periodic Health Assessment.","authors":"James D Mancuso, Anwar E Ahmed, Kristen R Rossi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared estimates of the prevalence of and risk factors for tobacco and nicotine use obtained from the 2018 Health Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS) and Periodic Health Assessment (PHA) survey. The HRBS and the PHA are important Department of Defense sources of data on health behavior collected from U.S. military service members. While their collection methods differ, some survey questions are similar, which provides an opportunity to compare survey estimates. Active duty service members consistently reported a much lower prevalence of all types of tobacco and nicotine use on the PHA compared to the HRBS: cigarettes (11.1% vs. 18.4%), e-cigarettes (7.3% vs. 16.2%), chewing tobacco (9.7% vs. 13.4%), any tobacco or nicotine use (25.3% vs. 37.8%), and use of 2 or more tobacco or nicotine products (5.8% vs. 17.4%). Associations between tobacco and nicotine use as well as demographic and other behavioral variables were fairly similar, including age, sex, education, race and ethnicity, rank, and alcohol use. The associations with service branch, body mass index, and sleep were inconsistent. This results of this study suggest that the PHA can provide timely information on trends in military tobacco and nicotine use over time, but much higher estimates from the confidential, voluntary HRBS reported in this study suggest that the command-directed PHA may substantially underestimate the prevalence of all types of tobacco and nicotine use.</p>","PeriodicalId":38856,"journal":{"name":"MSMR","volume":"31 3","pages":"2-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11023702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MSMR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared estimates of the prevalence of and risk factors for tobacco and nicotine use obtained from the 2018 Health Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS) and Periodic Health Assessment (PHA) survey. The HRBS and the PHA are important Department of Defense sources of data on health behavior collected from U.S. military service members. While their collection methods differ, some survey questions are similar, which provides an opportunity to compare survey estimates. Active duty service members consistently reported a much lower prevalence of all types of tobacco and nicotine use on the PHA compared to the HRBS: cigarettes (11.1% vs. 18.4%), e-cigarettes (7.3% vs. 16.2%), chewing tobacco (9.7% vs. 13.4%), any tobacco or nicotine use (25.3% vs. 37.8%), and use of 2 or more tobacco or nicotine products (5.8% vs. 17.4%). Associations between tobacco and nicotine use as well as demographic and other behavioral variables were fairly similar, including age, sex, education, race and ethnicity, rank, and alcohol use. The associations with service branch, body mass index, and sleep were inconsistent. This results of this study suggest that the PHA can provide timely information on trends in military tobacco and nicotine use over time, but much higher estimates from the confidential, voluntary HRBS reported in this study suggest that the command-directed PHA may substantially underestimate the prevalence of all types of tobacco and nicotine use.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国现役军人中的烟草和尼古丁使用情况:健康相关行为调查和定期健康评估的 2018 年估计值比较。
本研究比较了从 2018 年健康相关行为调查(HRBS)和定期健康评估(PHA)调查中获得的烟草和尼古丁使用流行率和风险因素估计值。HRBS 和 PHA 是美国国防部从美国军人中收集健康行为数据的重要来源。虽然它们的收集方法不同,但一些调查问题相似,这为比较调查估计值提供了机会。与HRBS相比,现役军人在PHA中报告的各类烟草和尼古丁使用率始终要低得多:香烟(11.1% vs. 18.4%)、电子烟(7.3% vs. 16.2%)、咀嚼烟草(9.7% vs. 13.4%)、任何烟草或尼古丁使用(25.3% vs. 37.8%)以及使用2种或2种以上烟草或尼古丁产品(5.8% vs. 17.4%)。烟草和尼古丁的使用与人口统计学和其他行为变量之间的关系相当相似,包括年龄、性别、教育程度、种族和民族、职级以及饮酒情况。与服役部门、体重指数和睡眠的关系则不一致。本研究结果表明,公共健康调查可以及时提供军队烟草和尼古丁使用随时间变化的趋势信息,但本研究中报告的保密、自愿的HRBS估计值要高得多,这表明指挥部指导的公共健康调查可能大大低估了各类烟草和尼古丁使用的流行率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MSMR
MSMR Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of a new fleet disease and injury surveillance capability using ESSENCE. External cause coding of injury encounters in the Military Health System among active component U.S. service members, 2016-2019. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma incidence in active component U.S. service members, 2017-2023. Ovarian dysfunction and polycystic ovary syndrome in the U.S. military active component, 2014-2023. The association of deployment-related probable traumatic brain injury with subsequent medical readiness status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1