Differences in velopharyngeal pressures during speech sound production in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and healthy individuals.

Q1 Medicine GMS German Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/000328
Simone Miller, Johanna Kallusky, Rüdiger Zimmerer, Frank Tavassol, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Martin Ptok, Michael Jungheim
{"title":"Differences in velopharyngeal pressures during speech sound production in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and healthy individuals.","authors":"Simone Miller, Johanna Kallusky, Rüdiger Zimmerer, Frank Tavassol, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Martin Ptok, Michael Jungheim","doi":"10.3205/000328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During articulation the velopharynx needs to be opened and closed rapidly and a tight closure is needed. Based on the hypothesis that patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) produce lower pressures in the velopharynx than healthy individuals, this study compared pressure profiles of the velopharyngeal closure during articulation of different sounds between healthy participants and patients with surgically closed unilateral CLP (UCLP) using high resolution manometry (HRM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten healthy adult volunteers (group 1: 20-25.5 years) and ten patients with a non-syndromic surgically reconstructed UCLP (group 2: 19.1-26.9 years) were included in this study. Pressure profiles during the articulation of four sounds (/i:/, /s/, /ʃ/ and /n/) were measured by HRM. Maximum, minimum and average pressures, time intervals as well as detection of a previously described 3-phase-model were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups presented with similar pressure curves for each phoneme with regards to the phases described and pressure peaks, but differed in total pressures. An exception was noted for the sound /i:/, where a 3-phase-model could not be seen for most patients with UCLP. Differences in velopharynx pressures of 50% and more were found between the two groups. Maximum and average pressures in the production of the alveolar fricative reached statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It can be concluded that velopharyngeal pressures of patients with UCLP are not sufficient to eliminate nasal resonance or turbulence during articulation, especially for more complex sounds. These results support a general understanding of hypernasality during speech implying a (relative) velopharyngeal insufficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":39243,"journal":{"name":"GMS German Medical Science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Doc02"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11034380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS German Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/000328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During articulation the velopharynx needs to be opened and closed rapidly and a tight closure is needed. Based on the hypothesis that patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) produce lower pressures in the velopharynx than healthy individuals, this study compared pressure profiles of the velopharyngeal closure during articulation of different sounds between healthy participants and patients with surgically closed unilateral CLP (UCLP) using high resolution manometry (HRM).

Materials and methods: Ten healthy adult volunteers (group 1: 20-25.5 years) and ten patients with a non-syndromic surgically reconstructed UCLP (group 2: 19.1-26.9 years) were included in this study. Pressure profiles during the articulation of four sounds (/i:/, /s/, /ʃ/ and /n/) were measured by HRM. Maximum, minimum and average pressures, time intervals as well as detection of a previously described 3-phase-model were compared.

Results: Both groups presented with similar pressure curves for each phoneme with regards to the phases described and pressure peaks, but differed in total pressures. An exception was noted for the sound /i:/, where a 3-phase-model could not be seen for most patients with UCLP. Differences in velopharynx pressures of 50% and more were found between the two groups. Maximum and average pressures in the production of the alveolar fricative reached statistical significance.

Conclusions: It can be concluded that velopharyngeal pressures of patients with UCLP are not sufficient to eliminate nasal resonance or turbulence during articulation, especially for more complex sounds. These results support a general understanding of hypernasality during speech implying a (relative) velopharyngeal insufficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者和健康人在发音时的咽喉压力差异。
背景:发音时,咽喉需要快速打开和闭合,并且需要紧密闭合。基于唇腭裂(CLP)患者产生的包咽压力低于健康人的假设,本研究使用高分辨率测压法(HRM)比较了健康参与者和手术闭合的单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者在发音时包咽闭合的压力曲线:研究对象包括 10 名健康成年志愿者(第 1 组:20-25.5 岁)和 10 名经手术重建的非综合征单侧 CLP 患者(第 2 组:19.1-26.9 岁)。研究人员通过 HRM 测量了四种发音(/i:/、/s/、/ʃ/ 和 /n/)时的压力曲线。对最大、最小和平均压力、时间间隔以及之前描述的三阶段模型的检测结果进行了比较:结果:就所描述的阶段和压力峰值而言,两组对每个音素的压力曲线相似,但总压力不同。但/i:/音是个例外,大多数 UCLP 患者都看不到三阶段模型。两组患者的咽鼓管压力相差 50% 或更多。发出肺泡擦音时的最大压力和平均压力均达到统计学意义:结论:可以得出结论,UCLP 患者的咽后压力不足以消除发音时的鼻腔共鸣或湍流,尤其是在发出较复杂的声音时。这些结果支持了对说话时鼻音过重的一般理解,即暗示了(相对的)咽喉功能不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GMS German Medical Science
GMS German Medical Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pathology in the legal framework of European and German medical device law: Operation, use and in-house manufacture of in vitro diagnostic medical devices. Significance of EEG-electrode combinations while calculating filters with common spatial patterns. Error assessment of subjective estimates of linear breast dimensions versus the objective method. Position statement on genuine physiotherapy research at German university hospitals. Joint recommendations on cost calculation and estimation in paediatric clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1