The landscape of decentralized clinical trials (DCTs): focusing on the FDA and EMA guidance.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e2
Jiyeon Park, Ki Young Huh, Woo Kyung Chung, Kyung-Sang Yu
{"title":"The landscape of decentralized clinical trials (DCTs): focusing on the FDA and EMA guidance.","authors":"Jiyeon Park, Ki Young Huh, Woo Kyung Chung, Kyung-Sang Yu","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) consist of off-site trial-related procedures referred to as decentralized elements. We aimed to provide an overview of the landscape of DCTs by comparing regulatory guidance reports and analyzing decentralized elements from clinical trial registries. Two guidance reports on DCTs published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agencies were summarized and analyzed. Both guidance publications commonly emphasized an assessment of the appropriateness of decentralized elements along 2 axes: patient safety and data integrity. DCT cases were identified from ClinicalTrials.gov by searching with 6 keywords: decentralized, remote, mobile, digital, virtual, and hybrid. Cases where the keyword was used in a non-DCT context, such as digital flexor tendon, were excluded by means of natural language processing. A total of 4,874 trials were identified as DCT cases, with annual increases, especially after 2020. The most common keywords were 'mobile' and 'digital' (36.2% and 24.8%, respectively). Interventions in the DCT cases were analyzed by means of a network analysis. Behavioral and technological tokens were frequently combined, such as 'rehabilitation' and 'app.' Drugs were used in only 1.8% of the DCT cases. Of these, most drugs had been approved previously (96.8%) and were in oral formulation (67.2%). Most of the DCT cases identified in this study involved simple interventions and low-risk drugs. These characteristics were in accordance with the common recommendations in the DCT guidance publications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) consist of off-site trial-related procedures referred to as decentralized elements. We aimed to provide an overview of the landscape of DCTs by comparing regulatory guidance reports and analyzing decentralized elements from clinical trial registries. Two guidance reports on DCTs published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agencies were summarized and analyzed. Both guidance publications commonly emphasized an assessment of the appropriateness of decentralized elements along 2 axes: patient safety and data integrity. DCT cases were identified from ClinicalTrials.gov by searching with 6 keywords: decentralized, remote, mobile, digital, virtual, and hybrid. Cases where the keyword was used in a non-DCT context, such as digital flexor tendon, were excluded by means of natural language processing. A total of 4,874 trials were identified as DCT cases, with annual increases, especially after 2020. The most common keywords were 'mobile' and 'digital' (36.2% and 24.8%, respectively). Interventions in the DCT cases were analyzed by means of a network analysis. Behavioral and technological tokens were frequently combined, such as 'rehabilitation' and 'app.' Drugs were used in only 1.8% of the DCT cases. Of these, most drugs had been approved previously (96.8%) and were in oral formulation (67.2%). Most of the DCT cases identified in this study involved simple interventions and low-risk drugs. These characteristics were in accordance with the common recommendations in the DCT guidance publications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分散临床试验 (DCT) 的现状:重点关注美国食品药物管理局 (FDA) 和欧洲医学管理局 (EMA) 的指导意见。
分散临床试验(DCT)由与试验相关的非现场程序组成,这些程序被称为分散元素。我们的目的是通过比较监管指导报告和分析临床试验登记册中的分散元素来概述分散临床试验的情况。我们对美国食品药品管理局和欧洲药品管理局发布的两份关于 DCT 的指导报告进行了总结和分析。这两份指导报告都强调从患者安全和数据完整性两个方面评估分散元素的适当性。通过使用 6 个关键词(分散、远程、移动、数字、虚拟和混合)进行搜索,从 ClinicalTrials.gov 中确定了 DCT 案例。通过自然语言处理,排除了在非DCT语境下使用关键词的病例,如数字屈肌腱。共有 4,874 项试验被确定为 DCT 病例,并且每年都在增加,尤其是在 2020 年之后。最常见的关键词是 "移动 "和 "数字"(分别占 36.2% 和 24.8%)。我们通过网络分析对 DCT 案例中的干预措施进行了分析。行为标记和技术标记经常结合在一起,如 "康复 "和 "应用程序"。只有 1.8% 的 DCT 案例使用了药物。其中,大多数药物之前已获批准(96.8%),并且是口服制剂(67.2%)。本研究发现的大多数 DCT 病例涉及简单的干预措施和低风险药物。这些特点符合 DCT 指南出版物中的常见建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Development of in-silico drug cardiac toxicity evaluation system with consideration of inter-individual variability. Enhancing drug administration flexibility: evaluation of pharmacokinetic properties of tegoprazan orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) administered via nasogastric tube or oral dosing. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of candesartan cilexetil tablet in Chinese volunteers under fasting condition: an open-label, randomized-sequence, 2-period crossover study. Data science through natural language with ChatGPT's Code Interpreter. Emerging and upcoming therapies in insomnia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1