Garadacimab for hereditary angioedema attack prevention: long-term efficacy, quality of life, and safety data from a phase 2, randomised, open-label extension study.

IF 15.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Lancet Haematology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00081-4
Timothy J Craig, Donald S Levy, Avner Reshef, William R Lumry, Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer, Joshua S Jacobs, William H Yang, Bruce Ritchie, Emel Aygören-Pürsün, Paul K Keith, Paula Busse, Henrike Feuersenger, Mihai Alexandru Bica, Iris Jacobs, Ingo Pragst, Markus Magerl
{"title":"Garadacimab for hereditary angioedema attack prevention: long-term efficacy, quality of life, and safety data from a phase 2, randomised, open-label extension study.","authors":"Timothy J Craig, Donald S Levy, Avner Reshef, William R Lumry, Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer, Joshua S Jacobs, William H Yang, Bruce Ritchie, Emel Aygören-Pürsün, Paul K Keith, Paula Busse, Henrike Feuersenger, Mihai Alexandru Bica, Iris Jacobs, Ingo Pragst, Markus Magerl","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00081-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Garadacimab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeting activated factor XII. This study evaluated long-term efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety data for garadacimab in adults with hereditary angioedema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This global phase 2 study comprised a treatment period 1 (TP1: 12 weeks, double-blind, placebo-controlled) and a treatment period 2 (TP2: ≥44-week open-label extension). Patients aged 18-65 years with clinically confirmed hereditary angioedema were eligible. In TP1, 32 patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous garadacimab (75 mg, 200 mg, or 600 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks (once monthly). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology via block randomisation (block sizes 1-4). Subsequently, six additional patients in TP1 were assigned to open-label garadacimab 400 mg every 2 weeks. At the start of TP2, patients were re-randomised (if receiving placebo, garadacimab 75 mg, or garadacimab 400 mg) or continued to receive garadacimab 200 mg or garadacimab 600 mg once monthly. After a protocol amendment on March 20, 2020, patients originally assigned to the 600 mg dose were down-titrated to 200 mg at their next visit. The primary endpoint (published previously) was monthly attack rate for patients receiving 200 mg or 600 mg garadacimab in TP1 in the intention-to-treat population. Here, we assessed the impact of garadacimab on patient-reported and investigator-reported outcomes and HRQoL as well as long-term efficacy and safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03712228, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 54 patients screened between Oct 29, 2018, and Aug 28, 2019, 32 randomised and six open-label patients completed TP1 and entered TP2 (20 in the garadacimab 200 mg group; 18 in the garadacimab 600 mg group; total 38 patients). Median age was 39·0 years (IQR 27·0-53·0), and 21 patients (55%) were female and 17 (45%) were male. In TP2, the median garadacimab exposure was 87·9 weeks (IQR 50·0-106·6) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 44·1 weeks (24·1-56·1) in the garadacimab 600 mg group. Median monthly attack rates were 0·0 (IQR 0·0-0·1) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 0·1 (0·0-0·4) in the garadacimb 600 mg group. Median reduction in monthly attack rate versus run-in was 100% (IQR 98-100) with garadacimab 200 mg. HRQoL improvements observed during TP1 with garadacimab were sustained throughout TP2. TP2 safety signals were consistent with TP1. Two patients experienced serious adverse events of diverticular perforation and asthma (not garadacimab-related). Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. The most common adverse events were headache (nine of 38, 24%) and abdominal pain (seven of 38, 18%). There were no treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Once-monthly garadacimab for more than 2 years in patients with hereditary angioedema was well tolerated and efficacious in reducing monthly attack rate and improving HRQoL. These results reveal the potential of long-term prophylactic treatment with 200 mg once-monthly garadacimab towards complete disease control of patients with hereditary angioedema.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>CSL Behring.</p>","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":" ","pages":"e436-e447"},"PeriodicalIF":15.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00081-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Garadacimab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeting activated factor XII. This study evaluated long-term efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety data for garadacimab in adults with hereditary angioedema.

Methods: This global phase 2 study comprised a treatment period 1 (TP1: 12 weeks, double-blind, placebo-controlled) and a treatment period 2 (TP2: ≥44-week open-label extension). Patients aged 18-65 years with clinically confirmed hereditary angioedema were eligible. In TP1, 32 patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous garadacimab (75 mg, 200 mg, or 600 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks (once monthly). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology via block randomisation (block sizes 1-4). Subsequently, six additional patients in TP1 were assigned to open-label garadacimab 400 mg every 2 weeks. At the start of TP2, patients were re-randomised (if receiving placebo, garadacimab 75 mg, or garadacimab 400 mg) or continued to receive garadacimab 200 mg or garadacimab 600 mg once monthly. After a protocol amendment on March 20, 2020, patients originally assigned to the 600 mg dose were down-titrated to 200 mg at their next visit. The primary endpoint (published previously) was monthly attack rate for patients receiving 200 mg or 600 mg garadacimab in TP1 in the intention-to-treat population. Here, we assessed the impact of garadacimab on patient-reported and investigator-reported outcomes and HRQoL as well as long-term efficacy and safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03712228, and is completed.

Findings: Of 54 patients screened between Oct 29, 2018, and Aug 28, 2019, 32 randomised and six open-label patients completed TP1 and entered TP2 (20 in the garadacimab 200 mg group; 18 in the garadacimab 600 mg group; total 38 patients). Median age was 39·0 years (IQR 27·0-53·0), and 21 patients (55%) were female and 17 (45%) were male. In TP2, the median garadacimab exposure was 87·9 weeks (IQR 50·0-106·6) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 44·1 weeks (24·1-56·1) in the garadacimab 600 mg group. Median monthly attack rates were 0·0 (IQR 0·0-0·1) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 0·1 (0·0-0·4) in the garadacimb 600 mg group. Median reduction in monthly attack rate versus run-in was 100% (IQR 98-100) with garadacimab 200 mg. HRQoL improvements observed during TP1 with garadacimab were sustained throughout TP2. TP2 safety signals were consistent with TP1. Two patients experienced serious adverse events of diverticular perforation and asthma (not garadacimab-related). Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. The most common adverse events were headache (nine of 38, 24%) and abdominal pain (seven of 38, 18%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Interpretation: Once-monthly garadacimab for more than 2 years in patients with hereditary angioedema was well tolerated and efficacious in reducing monthly attack rate and improving HRQoL. These results reveal the potential of long-term prophylactic treatment with 200 mg once-monthly garadacimab towards complete disease control of patients with hereditary angioedema.

Funding: CSL Behring.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防遗传性血管性水肿发作的加拉地单抗:一项第二阶段随机开放标签扩展研究的长期疗效、生活质量和安全性数据。
背景介绍加拉地单抗是一种针对活化的XII因子的全人源免疫球蛋白G4单克隆抗体。本研究评估了加拉单抗对遗传性血管性水肿成人患者的长期疗效、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和安全性数据:这项全球性2期研究包括治疗期1(TP1:12周,双盲,安慰剂对照)和治疗期2(TP2:≥44周,开放标签延长)。年龄在18-65岁之间、经临床确诊患有遗传性血管性水肿的患者均符合条件。在TP1中,32名患者被随机分配(1:1:1:1:1)接受皮下注射加拉地单抗(75毫克、200毫克或600毫克)或安慰剂,每4周一次(每月一次)。随机分配采用交互式响应技术,通过区块随机分配(区块大小为 1-4)进行。随后,TP1中又有6名患者被分配至开放标签加拉达西单抗400毫克,每2周一次。在 TP2 开始时,患者被重新随机分配(如果接受安慰剂、75 毫克的加拉单抗或 400 毫克的加拉单抗),或继续每月一次接受 200 毫克的加拉单抗或 600 毫克的加拉单抗。在 2020 年 3 月 20 日修订方案后,原本被分配到 600 毫克剂量的患者在下次就诊时将剂量降至 200 毫克。主要终点(之前已发表)是在意向治疗人群中接受200毫克或600毫克加拉达西单抗治疗的TP1患者的每月发作率。在此,我们评估了加拉达西单抗对患者报告和研究者报告的结果、HRQoL 以及长期疗效和安全性的影响。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03712228)上注册,并已完成:在2018年10月29日至2019年8月28日期间筛选的54名患者中,32名随机患者和6名开放标签患者完成了TP1并进入TP2(加拉达西单抗200毫克组20名;加拉达西单抗600毫克组18名;共38名患者)。中位年龄为 39-0 岁(IQR 27-0-53-0),21 名患者(55%)为女性,17 名患者(45%)为男性。在 TP2 中,加拉单抗 200 毫克组的中位加拉单抗暴露时间为 87-9 周(IQR 50-0-106-6),加拉单抗 600 毫克组为 44-1 周(24-1-56-1)。加拉达西单抗 200 毫克组每月发作率的中位数为 0-0(IQR 0-0-0-1),加拉达西单抗 600 毫克组为 0-1(0-0-0-4)。加拉达西单抗 200 毫克组的每月发作率中位数较试验前降低了 100%(IQR 98-100)。在 TP1 期间观察到的加拉达西单抗的 HRQoL 改善在整个 TP2 期间得以持续。TP2 的安全性信号与 TP1 一致。两名患者发生了憩室穿孔和哮喘(与加达单抗无关)的严重不良事件。治疗引发的不良事件大多为轻度或中度。最常见的不良事件是头痛(38 例中有 9 例,占 24%)和腹痛(38 例中有 7 例,占 18%)。无治疗相关死亡病例:遗传性血管性水肿患者每月使用一次加拉地单抗,疗程超过2年,患者耐受性良好,在降低每月发作率和改善HRQoL方面疗效显著。这些结果揭示了遗传性血管性水肿患者接受每月一次、每次200毫克的加拉达西单抗长期预防性治疗以实现疾病完全控制的潜力:资金来源:CSL Behring。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Haematology
Lancet Haematology HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
26.00
自引率
0.80%
发文量
323
期刊介绍: Launched in autumn 2014, The Lancet Haematology is part of the Lancet specialty journals, exclusively available online. This monthly journal is committed to publishing original research that not only sheds light on haematological clinical practice but also advocates for change within the field. Aligned with the Lancet journals' tradition of high-impact research, The Lancet Haematology aspires to achieve a similar standing and reputation within its discipline. It upholds the rigorous reporting standards characteristic of all Lancet titles, ensuring a consistent commitment to quality in its contributions to the field of haematology.
期刊最新文献
Time to optimise management of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Variations in antenatal management and outcomes in haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: an international, retrospective, observational cohort study. Concizumab prophylaxis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B without inhibitors (explorer8): a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3a trial. Accelerating and optimising CAR T-cell manufacture to deliver better patient products. Management of pregnancies with anti-K alloantibodies and the predictive value of anti-K titration testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1