Aerosol drug therapy in critically ill patients (Aero-in-ICU study): A multicentre prospective observational cohort study.

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Lung India Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_580_23
Sanjay Singhal, Mohan Gurjar, Jyoti Narayan Sahoo, Sai Saran, Ruchi Dua, Alok Kumar Sahoo, Ankur Sharma, Sonika Agarwal, Arun Sharma, Pralay Shankar Ghosh, Parnandi Bhaskar Rao, Nikhil Kothari, Krupal Joshi, Kunal Deokar, Sudipta Mukherjee, Prakhar Sharma, Billa Ps Sreedevi, Prakash Sivaramakrishnan, Umadri Singh, Dhivya Sundaram, Avinash Agrawal, Chandan Dev Singh Katoch
{"title":"Aerosol drug therapy in critically ill patients (Aero-in-ICU study): A multicentre prospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Sanjay Singhal, Mohan Gurjar, Jyoti Narayan Sahoo, Sai Saran, Ruchi Dua, Alok Kumar Sahoo, Ankur Sharma, Sonika Agarwal, Arun Sharma, Pralay Shankar Ghosh, Parnandi Bhaskar Rao, Nikhil Kothari, Krupal Joshi, Kunal Deokar, Sudipta Mukherjee, Prakhar Sharma, Billa Ps Sreedevi, Prakash Sivaramakrishnan, Umadri Singh, Dhivya Sundaram, Avinash Agrawal, Chandan Dev Singh Katoch","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_580_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, a significant understanding of delivering optimal aerosol therapy and the availability of various drugs and devices have led to an increase in its use in clinical practice. There are only a few studies available regarding their use in critically ill patients from a few parts of the world. We aimed to study the practice pattern of aerosol therapy in critically ill patients from Indian intensive care units (ICUs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After ethical approval, this multi-centric prospective observational study was performed over a study period of four weeks. Newly admitted adult patients considered who had an artificial airway and/or ventilation (including non-invasive). Patients were followed up for the next 14 days or until ICU discharge/death (whichever came first) for details of each aerosol therapy, including ongoing respiratory support, drug type, and aerosol-generating device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the nine participating centers across India, 218 patients were enrolled. Of 218 enrolled patients, 72.48% received 4884 aerosols with 30.91 ± 27.15 (95%CI: 26.6-35.1) aerosols per patient over 1108 patient days. Approximately 62.7% during IMV, 30.2% during NIV, 2.3% in spontaneously breathing patients with an artificial airway during weaning, and 4.7% were given without an artificial airway after weaning or decannulation. In 59%, a single drug was used, and bronchodilators were the most frequent. The jet nebulizer was the most common, followed by the ultrasonic and vibrating mesh aerosol generator. The ventilator setting was changed in only 6.6% of the aerosol sessions with IMV and none with NIV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aerosol therapy is frequently used with a wide variation in practices; bronchodilators are the most commonly used drugs, and jet nebulizers are the most widely used.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"41 3","pages":"200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_580_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, a significant understanding of delivering optimal aerosol therapy and the availability of various drugs and devices have led to an increase in its use in clinical practice. There are only a few studies available regarding their use in critically ill patients from a few parts of the world. We aimed to study the practice pattern of aerosol therapy in critically ill patients from Indian intensive care units (ICUs).

Methods: After ethical approval, this multi-centric prospective observational study was performed over a study period of four weeks. Newly admitted adult patients considered who had an artificial airway and/or ventilation (including non-invasive). Patients were followed up for the next 14 days or until ICU discharge/death (whichever came first) for details of each aerosol therapy, including ongoing respiratory support, drug type, and aerosol-generating device.

Results: From the nine participating centers across India, 218 patients were enrolled. Of 218 enrolled patients, 72.48% received 4884 aerosols with 30.91 ± 27.15 (95%CI: 26.6-35.1) aerosols per patient over 1108 patient days. Approximately 62.7% during IMV, 30.2% during NIV, 2.3% in spontaneously breathing patients with an artificial airway during weaning, and 4.7% were given without an artificial airway after weaning or decannulation. In 59%, a single drug was used, and bronchodilators were the most frequent. The jet nebulizer was the most common, followed by the ultrasonic and vibrating mesh aerosol generator. The ventilator setting was changed in only 6.6% of the aerosol sessions with IMV and none with NIV.

Conclusion: Aerosol therapy is frequently used with a wide variation in practices; bronchodilators are the most commonly used drugs, and jet nebulizers are the most widely used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重病人的气溶胶药物治疗(重症监护病房气溶胶研究):一项多中心前瞻性队列观察研究。
背景:近年来,随着对最佳气溶胶疗法的深入了解以及各种药物和设备的出现,气溶胶疗法在临床实践中的应用越来越广泛。目前,世界上只有少数地区对危重病人使用气雾疗法进行了研究。我们旨在研究印度重症监护病房(ICU)重症患者的气雾疗法实践模式:在获得伦理批准后,我们进行了为期四周的多中心前瞻性观察研究。研究对象为新入院的成人患者,这些患者均使用人工气道和/或通气(包括无创通气)。在接下来的 14 天或重症监护室出院/死亡前(以先到者为准),对患者进行随访,以了解每种气溶胶疗法的详情,包括正在进行的呼吸支持、药物类型和气溶胶产生装置:印度的九个参与中心共招募了 218 名患者。在 218 名登记患者中,72.48% 的患者接受了 4884 次气雾剂治疗,每位患者在 1108 个患者日中接受了 30.91 ± 27.15(95%CI:26.6-35.1)次气雾剂治疗。约 62.7% 在 IMV 期间使用,30.2% 在 NIV 期间使用,2.3% 在断奶期间使用人工气道的自主呼吸患者中使用,4.7% 在断奶或停药后在没有人工气道的情况下使用。59%的患者使用单一药物,其中支气管扩张剂使用最多。最常用的是喷射式雾化器,其次是超声波和振动网状气溶胶发生器。在使用 IMV 的气雾治疗中,仅有 6.6% 的疗程改变了呼吸机设置,而在使用 NIV 的疗程中则没有:结论:气雾疗法使用频繁,但做法差异很大;支气管扩张剂是最常用的药物,而喷射式雾化器的使用最为广泛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
A case letter on management of recurrent melioidosis. A Survey of Rigid Bronchoscopy Practices in India. A young lady with multiple lung nodules. Artificial Intelligence: The new weapon to END TB. Beyond tradition: Exploring the potential of a novel drainage technique for indwelling pleural catheter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1