Point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric anesthesiology: considerations for training and credentialing.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001371
Thomas J Lockhart, Elaina E Lin, Adam C Adler
{"title":"Point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric anesthesiology: considerations for training and credentialing.","authors":"Thomas J Lockhart, Elaina E Lin, Adam C Adler","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To discuss considerations surrounding the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in pediatric anesthesiology.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>POCUS is an indispensable tool in various medical specialties, including pediatric anesthesiology. Credentialing for POCUS should be considered to ensure that practitioners are able to acquire images, interpret them correctly, and use ultrasound to guide procedures safely and effectively. In the absence of formal guidelines for anesthesiology, current practice and oversight varies by institution. In this review, we will explore the significance of POCUS in pediatric anesthesiology, discuss credentialing, and compare the specific requirements and challenges currently associated with using POCUS in pediatric anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound is being utilized by the pediatric anesthesiologist and has the potential to improve patient assessment, procedure guidance, and decision-making. Guidelines increase standardization and quality assurance procedures help maintain high-quality data. Credentialing standards for POCUS in pediatric anesthesiology are essential to ensure that practitioners have the necessary skills and knowledge to use this technology effectively and safely. Currently, there are no national pediatric POCUS guidelines to base credentialing processes on for pediatric anesthesia practices. Further work directed at establishing pediatric-specific curriculum goals and competency standards are needed to train current and future pediatric anesthesia providers and increase overall acceptance of POCUS use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":"37 3","pages":"259-265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001371","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To discuss considerations surrounding the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in pediatric anesthesiology.

Recent findings: POCUS is an indispensable tool in various medical specialties, including pediatric anesthesiology. Credentialing for POCUS should be considered to ensure that practitioners are able to acquire images, interpret them correctly, and use ultrasound to guide procedures safely and effectively. In the absence of formal guidelines for anesthesiology, current practice and oversight varies by institution. In this review, we will explore the significance of POCUS in pediatric anesthesiology, discuss credentialing, and compare the specific requirements and challenges currently associated with using POCUS in pediatric anesthesia.

Summary: Point-of-care ultrasound is being utilized by the pediatric anesthesiologist and has the potential to improve patient assessment, procedure guidance, and decision-making. Guidelines increase standardization and quality assurance procedures help maintain high-quality data. Credentialing standards for POCUS in pediatric anesthesiology are essential to ensure that practitioners have the necessary skills and knowledge to use this technology effectively and safely. Currently, there are no national pediatric POCUS guidelines to base credentialing processes on for pediatric anesthesia practices. Further work directed at establishing pediatric-specific curriculum goals and competency standards are needed to train current and future pediatric anesthesia providers and increase overall acceptance of POCUS use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科麻醉学中的护理点超声:培训和资格认证的注意事项。
综述的目的:讨论在儿科麻醉中使用床旁超声(POCUS)的注意事项:POCUS 是包括儿科麻醉学在内的各种医学专科不可或缺的工具。应考虑对 POCUS 进行资格认证,以确保从业人员能够获取图像、正确解读图像并安全有效地使用超声波指导手术。由于缺乏正式的麻醉学指南,目前的实践和监督因机构而异。在这篇综述中,我们将探讨 POCUS 在小儿麻醉学中的意义,讨论资格认证,并比较目前在小儿麻醉中使用 POCUS 的具体要求和挑战。摘要:小儿麻醉医师正在使用护理点超声,它具有改善患者评估、手术指导和决策的潜力。指南提高了标准化程度,质量保证程序有助于保持高质量的数据。儿科麻醉学 POCUS 的资格认证标准对于确保从业人员具备必要的技能和知识以有效、安全地使用该技术至关重要。目前,还没有全国性的儿科 POCUS 指南作为儿科麻醉实践的资格认证流程的依据。我们需要进一步开展工作,制定针对儿科的课程目标和能力标准,以培训当前和未来的儿科麻醉提供者,并提高 POCUS 使用的总体接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning: implications and applications for ambulatory anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory patients. Mitigating and preventing perioperative opioid-related harm. More than pacemakers and defibrillators: perioperative management of implantable devices for patient safety. Safety amid the scalpels: creating psychological safety in the operating room.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1