Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the English NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Markov Model.

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS PharmacoEconomics Open Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1007/s41669-024-00487-6
Emma McManus
{"title":"Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the English NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Markov Model.","authors":"Emma McManus","doi":"10.1007/s41669-024-00487-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2016, England launched the largest nationwide diabetes mellitus prevention programme, the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP). This paper seeks to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of this programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov cohort state transition model was developed with a 35-year time horizon and yearly cycles to compare referral to the NHS DPP to usual care for individuals with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia. The modelled cohort of individuals mirrored the age profile of referrals received by the programme by April 2020. A health system perspective was taken, with costs in UK £ Sterling (price year 2020) and outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Probabilistic analysis with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations was used. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the uncertainty surrounding the base case results, particularly varying the length of time for which the effectiveness of the programme was expected to last.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base case, using only the observed effectiveness of the NHS DPP at 3 years, it was found that the programme is likely to dominate usual care, by generating on average 40.8 incremental QALYs whilst saving £135,755 in costs for a cohort of 1000. At a willingness to pay of £20,000 per QALY, 98.1% of simulations were on or under the willingness-to-pay threshold. Scaling this up to the number of referrals actually received by the NHS DPP prior to April 2020, cost savings of £71.4 million were estimated over the 35-year time horizon and an additional 21,472 QALYs generated. These results are robust to several sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NHS DPP is likely to be cost-effective. Indeed, in the majority of the simulations, the NHS DPP was cost-saving and generated greater QALYs, dominating usual care. This research should serve as evidence to support the continued investment or recommissioning of diabetes prevention programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11252105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-024-00487-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2016, England launched the largest nationwide diabetes mellitus prevention programme, the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP). This paper seeks to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of this programme.

Methods: A Markov cohort state transition model was developed with a 35-year time horizon and yearly cycles to compare referral to the NHS DPP to usual care for individuals with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia. The modelled cohort of individuals mirrored the age profile of referrals received by the programme by April 2020. A health system perspective was taken, with costs in UK £ Sterling (price year 2020) and outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Probabilistic analysis with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations was used. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the uncertainty surrounding the base case results, particularly varying the length of time for which the effectiveness of the programme was expected to last.

Results: In the base case, using only the observed effectiveness of the NHS DPP at 3 years, it was found that the programme is likely to dominate usual care, by generating on average 40.8 incremental QALYs whilst saving £135,755 in costs for a cohort of 1000. At a willingness to pay of £20,000 per QALY, 98.1% of simulations were on or under the willingness-to-pay threshold. Scaling this up to the number of referrals actually received by the NHS DPP prior to April 2020, cost savings of £71.4 million were estimated over the 35-year time horizon and an additional 21,472 QALYs generated. These results are robust to several sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: The NHS DPP is likely to be cost-effective. Indeed, in the majority of the simulations, the NHS DPP was cost-saving and generated greater QALYs, dominating usual care. This research should serve as evidence to support the continued investment or recommissioning of diabetes prevention programmes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用马尔可夫模型评估英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划的长期成本效益。
背景:2016年,英国启动了全国范围内最大的糖尿病预防计划--英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划(NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme,NHS DPP)。本文旨在评估该计划的长期成本效益:方法:建立了一个马尔可夫队列状态转换模型,该模型的时间跨度为 35 年,以年为周期,将非糖尿病高血糖患者转诊至 NHS DPP 与常规护理进行比较。模型中的人群反映了到 2020 年 4 月该计划收到的转诊患者的年龄分布。从卫生系统的角度出发,成本以英镑计算(2020 年价格),结果以质量调整生命年计算。采用了 10,000 次蒙特卡罗模拟的概率分析。进行了几项敏感性分析,以探讨基础案例结果的不确定性,特别是改变该计划的有效性预期持续时间:结果:在基础案例中,仅使用国家医疗服务系统 DPP 3 年的观察效果,发现该计划可能在常规护理中占主导地位,平均产生 40.8 个增量 QALY,同时为 1000 人的队列节省 135,755 英镑的成本。按每 QALY 20,000 英镑的支付意愿计算,98.1% 的模拟结果达到或低于支付意愿临界值。根据 2020 年 4 月之前国家医疗服务系统 DPP 实际收到的转诊数量,在 35 年的时间跨度内,估计可节省 7140 万英镑的成本,并额外产生 21472 QALY。这些结果对多项敏感性分析都是可靠的:结论:国家医疗服务系统 DPP 可能具有成本效益。事实上,在大多数模拟中,NHS DPP 都能节约成本,并产生更多的 QALYs,在常规护理中占主导地位。这项研究应作为支持继续投资或重新委托糖尿病预防计划的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Costs of Adverse Events in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma with First-Line Treatment. Digital Versus Paper-Based Consent from the UK NHS Perspective: A Micro-costing Analysis. Correction: Cost-Effectiveness of Dupilumab and Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Singapore. Publisher Correction: Health Technology Assessment Reports for Non-Oncology Medications in Canada from 2018 to 2022: Methodological Critiques on Manufacturers' Submissions and a Comparison Between Manufacturer and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Analyses. Comparison of Two Financial Incentives to Encourage the Use of Adalimumab Biosimilars: Results of a French Experiment Close to Clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1