Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Motivation for Healing Scale in Patients with Cancer.

Journal of caring sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.34172/jcs.2024.31919
Fatemeh Hossieni, Eesa Mohammadi, Reza Hosseini, Zohreh Sadat, Negin Masoudi Alavi
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Motivation for Healing Scale in Patients with Cancer.","authors":"Fatemeh Hossieni, Eesa Mohammadi, Reza Hosseini, Zohreh Sadat, Negin Masoudi Alavi","doi":"10.34172/jcs.2024.31919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was conducted to develop and validate a Motivation for Healing Scale (MHS) in Cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>in this methodological study, the MHS draft was developed based on the approach of Waltz and colleagues using existing scales and concept analysis. The psychometric features, including face validity (qualitative and quantitative), content validity (qualitative and quantitative), structural validity (exploratory and confirmatory factors), and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity) were assessed. Finally, the reliability was evaluated using internal consistency, and stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the results of the qualitative phase, an initial item pool was generated with 55 items, Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed on the data collected from 404 patients. 25 Items were excluded during the psychometric evaluation phases. Reliability assessment and internal consistency assessment revealed that Cronbach's alpha value of the 25-item MHS was 0.912. The results of intraclass correlation coefficient (0.93, 95% CI: 0.86- 0.96) showed the stability was strong.</p><p><strong>Conclution: </strong>The 25-item MHS is a valid and reliable scale for the assessment of motivation for healing in patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":516530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of caring sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11036165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of caring sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2024.31919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study was conducted to develop and validate a Motivation for Healing Scale (MHS) in Cancer.

Methods: in this methodological study, the MHS draft was developed based on the approach of Waltz and colleagues using existing scales and concept analysis. The psychometric features, including face validity (qualitative and quantitative), content validity (qualitative and quantitative), structural validity (exploratory and confirmatory factors), and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity) were assessed. Finally, the reliability was evaluated using internal consistency, and stability.

Results: Based on the results of the qualitative phase, an initial item pool was generated with 55 items, Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed on the data collected from 404 patients. 25 Items were excluded during the psychometric evaluation phases. Reliability assessment and internal consistency assessment revealed that Cronbach's alpha value of the 25-item MHS was 0.912. The results of intraclass correlation coefficient (0.93, 95% CI: 0.86- 0.96) showed the stability was strong.

Conclution: The 25-item MHS is a valid and reliable scale for the assessment of motivation for healing in patients with cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者治愈动机量表的开发和心理测量学评估。
简介方法:在这项方法学研究中,根据华尔兹及其同事的方法,利用现有量表和概念分析开发了癌症治愈动机量表(MHS)草案。对心理测量特征进行了评估,包括面效度(定性和定量)、内容效度(定性和定量)、结构效度(探索性和确认性因素)和构架效度(收敛效度和区分效度)。最后,使用内部一致性和稳定性对可靠性进行了评估:根据定性阶段的结果,产生了一个包含 55 个项目的初始项目库,并对从 404 名患者那里收集到的数据进行了探索性和确认性因素分析。心理测量评估阶段排除了 25 个项目。信度评估和内部一致性评估显示,25 个项目的 MHS 的 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.912。类内相关系数(0.93,95% CI:0.86-0.96)的结果显示其稳定性很强:25个项目的MHS是评估癌症患者治疗动机的有效而可靠的量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Lived Experience of Nursing Students from Student Work in Clinical Environments: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study. Exploring Nursing Students' Expectations on Preceptoring and Preceptorship Program: A Mixed Method Study. An Examination of the Agreement between Self-reported Diabetes and Paraclinical Tests, Medical Records, and Clinical Examinations: Insights from the Shahedieh Cohort Study, Yazd, Iran. Identifying the Risk Factors of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among Women with COVID-19: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Southern Iran. Theory-Practice Gap During Clinical Learning: A Descriptive Qualitative Study of Nursing Students' Experiences and Perceptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1