Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Adjacent Segment Disease: Techniques and Outcomes in 107 Patients Undergoing Surgical Intervention.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY International Journal of Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.14444/8599
Malek Bashti, Manav Daftari, Gregory D Brusko, Aria M Jamshidi, Eric B Singh, James V Boddu, Vignessh Kumar, Michael M H Yang, Michael Y Wang
{"title":"Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Adjacent Segment Disease: Techniques and Outcomes in 107 Patients Undergoing Surgical Intervention.","authors":"Malek Bashti, Manav Daftari, Gregory D Brusko, Aria M Jamshidi, Eric B Singh, James V Boddu, Vignessh Kumar, Michael M H Yang, Michael Y Wang","doi":"10.14444/8599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a known sequela of thoracolumbar instrumented fusions. Various surgical options are available to address ASD in patients with intractable symptoms who have failed conservative measures. However, the optimal treatment strategy for symptomatic ASD has not been established. We examined several clinical outcomes utilizing different surgical interventions for symptomatic ASD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed for a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision surgery for thoracolumbar ASD between October 2011 and February 2022. Patients were treated with endoscopic decompression (<i>N</i> = 17), microdiscectomy (<i>N</i> = 9), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF; <i>N</i> = 26), or open laminectomy and fusion (LF; <i>N</i> = 55). The primary outcomes compared between groups were re-operation rates and numeric pain scores for leg and back at 2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperation. Secondary outcomes included time to re-operation, estimated blood loss, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 257 patients who underwent revision surgery for symptomatic ASD, 107 patients met inclusion criteria with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The mean age of all patients was 67.90 ± 10.51 years. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in age, gender, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists scoring, number of previously fused levels, or preoperative numeric leg and back pain scores. The re-operation rates were significantly lower in LF (12.7%) and LLIF cohorts (19.2%) compared with microdiscectomy (33%) and endoscopic decompression (52.9%; <i>P</i> = 0.005). Only LF and LLIF cohorts experienced significantly decreased pain scores at all 4 follow-up visits (2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months; <i>P</i> < 0.001 and <i>P</i> < 0.05, respectively) relative to preoperative scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Symptomatic ASD often requires treatment with revision surgery. Fusion surgeries (either stand-alone lateral interbody or posterolateral with instrumentation) were most effective and durable with respect to alleviating pain and avoiding additional revisions within the first 12 months following revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study emphasizes the importance of risk-stratifying patients to identify the least invasive approach that treats their symptoms and reduces the risk of future surgeries.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"295-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a known sequela of thoracolumbar instrumented fusions. Various surgical options are available to address ASD in patients with intractable symptoms who have failed conservative measures. However, the optimal treatment strategy for symptomatic ASD has not been established. We examined several clinical outcomes utilizing different surgical interventions for symptomatic ASD.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed for a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision surgery for thoracolumbar ASD between October 2011 and February 2022. Patients were treated with endoscopic decompression (N = 17), microdiscectomy (N = 9), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF; N = 26), or open laminectomy and fusion (LF; N = 55). The primary outcomes compared between groups were re-operation rates and numeric pain scores for leg and back at 2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperation. Secondary outcomes included time to re-operation, estimated blood loss, and length of stay.

Results: Of the 257 patients who underwent revision surgery for symptomatic ASD, 107 patients met inclusion criteria with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The mean age of all patients was 67.90 ± 10.51 years. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in age, gender, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists scoring, number of previously fused levels, or preoperative numeric leg and back pain scores. The re-operation rates were significantly lower in LF (12.7%) and LLIF cohorts (19.2%) compared with microdiscectomy (33%) and endoscopic decompression (52.9%; P = 0.005). Only LF and LLIF cohorts experienced significantly decreased pain scores at all 4 follow-up visits (2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months; P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively) relative to preoperative scores.

Conclusion: Symptomatic ASD often requires treatment with revision surgery. Fusion surgeries (either stand-alone lateral interbody or posterolateral with instrumentation) were most effective and durable with respect to alleviating pain and avoiding additional revisions within the first 12 months following revision surgery.

Clinical relevance: This study emphasizes the importance of risk-stratifying patients to identify the least invasive approach that treats their symptoms and reduces the risk of future surgeries.

Level of evidence: 3:

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腰椎相邻节段疾病的外科治疗:107例接受手术干预患者的技术和疗效。
背景:邻近节段疾病(ASD)是已知的胸腰椎器械融合术后遗症。对于有顽固症状且保守治疗无效的患者,有多种手术方案可用于治疗邻近节段疾病。然而,针对有症状的 ASD 的最佳治疗策略尚未确定。我们研究了利用不同手术干预治疗症状性 ASD 的几种临床结果:我们对2011年10月至2022年2月期间接受胸腰椎ASD翻修手术的一系列患者进行了回顾性研究。患者接受了内窥镜减压术(17 例)、显微椎间盘切除术(9 例)、侧腰椎椎间融合术(26 例)或开放式椎板切除融合术(55 例)。各组间比较的主要结果是再次手术率以及术后2周、10周、6个月和12个月时腿部和背部的数字疼痛评分。次要结果包括再次手术时间、估计失血量和住院时间:在因症状性 ASD 而接受翻修手术的 257 名患者中,有 107 名患者符合纳入标准,随访时间至少为 1 年。所有患者的平均年龄为(67.90 ± 10.51)岁。各组患者在年龄、性别、术前美国麻醉医师协会评分、既往融合水平数量或术前腿痛和背痛数字评分方面均无统计学差异。与显微椎间盘切除术(33%)和内窥镜减压术(52.9%;P = 0.005)相比,LF 组(12.7%)和 LLIF 组(19.2%)的再次手术率明显较低。只有LF和LLIF组在所有4次随访(2周、10周、6个月和12个月;P < 0.001和P < 0.05,分别为P < 0.001和P < 0.05)中的疼痛评分均较术前评分明显下降:结论:有症状的ASD通常需要通过翻修手术进行治疗。融合手术(独立外侧椎间融合或后外侧加器械融合)在缓解疼痛和避免翻修手术后12个月内再次翻修方面最为有效和持久:这项研究强调了对患者进行风险分级的重要性,以确定能治疗其症状并降低未来手术风险的微创方法:3:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Using the ExcelsiusGPS Robotic Navigation Platform: An Analysis of 728 Screws. Editorial: Embracing Rasch Analysis for Enhanced Spine Surgery Outcomes-The Outsider's Viewpoint. Editors' Introduction: High-Value Endoscopic Techniques: Integrating Surgeon Skill and Experience in Spine Surgery With Rasch Analysis. Invited Commentary: Rasch Analysis and High-Value Spinal Endoscopy. Letter to the Editor: Articles and Accompanying Editorials on Rasch Analysis of High-Value Endoscopic Surgeries-A Message From the ISASS Co-President.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1