Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Thyroid Hormone Replacement Therapy for Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Older Adults: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data from Two Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Thyroid Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1089/thy.2023.0624
Janneke Ravensberg, Rosalinde K E Poortvliet, Robert Du Puy, Nicolas Rodondi, Manuel Blum, Patricia Kearney, Vera J C McCarthy, Terry Quinn, Olaf Dekkers, Wouter Jukema, Simon Mooijaart, Jacobijn Gussekloo
{"title":"Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Thyroid Hormone Replacement Therapy for Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Older Adults: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data from Two Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Janneke Ravensberg, Rosalinde K E Poortvliet, Robert Du Puy, Nicolas Rodondi, Manuel Blum, Patricia Kearney, Vera J C McCarthy, Terry Quinn, Olaf Dekkers, Wouter Jukema, Simon Mooijaart, Jacobijn Gussekloo","doi":"10.1089/thy.2023.0624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The benefit of levothyroxine treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is subject to debate. This study compared treatment satisfaction between older adults with SCH using levothyroxine or placebo. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We analyzed pooled individual participant data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating the effects of levothyroxine treatment in older adults with SCH. Community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 years, with SCH (persistent thyrotropin levels 4.60-19.99 mIU/L for >3 months and normal free T4 level), were included. Intervention dose titration until thyrotropin levels normalized, with a mock dose adjustment of placebo. Treatment satisfaction was determined during the final study visit using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), encompassing perceived effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction, along with the participants' desire to continue study medication after the trial. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We included 536 participants. At baseline, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 74.9 (69.7-81.4) years, and 292 (55%) were women. The median (IQR) thyrotropin levels were 5.80 (5.10-7.00) mIU/L at baseline in both groups; at final visit, 4.97 (3.90-6.35) mIU/L in the placebo and 3.24 (2.49-4.41) mIU/L in the levothyroxine group. After treatment, the groups did not differ significantly in global satisfaction (mean difference [CI] -1.1 [-4.5 to 2.1], <i>p</i> = 0.48), nor in any other domain of treatment satisfaction. These results held true regardless of baseline thyrotropin levels or symptom burden. No major differences were found in the numbers of participants who wished to continue medication after the trial (levothyroxine 35% vs. placebo 27%), did not wish to continue (levothyroxine 27% vs. placebo 30%), or did not know (levothyroxine 37% vs. placebo 42%) (<i>p</i> = 0.14). In a subpopulation with high symptom burden from hypothyroid symptoms at baseline, those using levothyroxine more often desired to continue the medication after the trial than those using placebo (mean difference [CI]: -21.1% [-35.6% to -6.5%]). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These pooled data from two RCTs showed no major differences in treatment satisfaction between older adults receiving levothyroxine or placebo. This finding has important implications for decision-making regarding initiating levothyroxine treatment for SCH. Our findings generally support refraining from routinely prescribing levothyroxine in older adults with SCH.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"702-712"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2023.0624","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The benefit of levothyroxine treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is subject to debate. This study compared treatment satisfaction between older adults with SCH using levothyroxine or placebo. Methods: We analyzed pooled individual participant data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating the effects of levothyroxine treatment in older adults with SCH. Community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 years, with SCH (persistent thyrotropin levels 4.60-19.99 mIU/L for >3 months and normal free T4 level), were included. Intervention dose titration until thyrotropin levels normalized, with a mock dose adjustment of placebo. Treatment satisfaction was determined during the final study visit using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), encompassing perceived effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction, along with the participants' desire to continue study medication after the trial. Results: We included 536 participants. At baseline, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 74.9 (69.7-81.4) years, and 292 (55%) were women. The median (IQR) thyrotropin levels were 5.80 (5.10-7.00) mIU/L at baseline in both groups; at final visit, 4.97 (3.90-6.35) mIU/L in the placebo and 3.24 (2.49-4.41) mIU/L in the levothyroxine group. After treatment, the groups did not differ significantly in global satisfaction (mean difference [CI] -1.1 [-4.5 to 2.1], p = 0.48), nor in any other domain of treatment satisfaction. These results held true regardless of baseline thyrotropin levels or symptom burden. No major differences were found in the numbers of participants who wished to continue medication after the trial (levothyroxine 35% vs. placebo 27%), did not wish to continue (levothyroxine 27% vs. placebo 30%), or did not know (levothyroxine 37% vs. placebo 42%) (p = 0.14). In a subpopulation with high symptom burden from hypothyroid symptoms at baseline, those using levothyroxine more often desired to continue the medication after the trial than those using placebo (mean difference [CI]: -21.1% [-35.6% to -6.5%]). Conclusion: These pooled data from two RCTs showed no major differences in treatment satisfaction between older adults receiving levothyroxine or placebo. This finding has important implications for decision-making regarding initiating levothyroxine treatment for SCH. Our findings generally support refraining from routinely prescribing levothyroxine in older adults with SCH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对甲状腺激素替代疗法治疗亚临床甲状腺功能减退症的满意度报告:对两项随机对照试验中个体参与者数据的汇总分析。
背景:左甲状腺素治疗亚临床甲状腺功能减退症(SCH)的益处备受争议。本研究比较了患有亚临床甲状腺功能减退症的老年人使用左甲状腺素或安慰剂治疗的满意度。研究方法我们分析了两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中汇集的个体参与者数据,这些试验调查了左旋甲状腺素对患有亚临床甲状腺功能减退症(SCH)的老年人的治疗效果。研究对象包括年龄≥65岁、患有SCH(甲状腺素水平4.60-19.99 mIU/L,持续时间大于3个月,游离T4水平正常)的社区居民。干预剂量滴定直至促甲状腺激素水平恢复正常,并使用安慰剂进行模拟剂量调整。在最后一次研究访问中,使用药物治疗满意度问卷(TSQM)确定治疗满意度,问卷包括疗效、副作用、便利性和总体满意度,以及参与者在试验后继续接受研究药物治疗的意愿。研究结果我们共纳入了 536 名参与者。基线年龄中位数(四分位距[IQR])为 74.9(69.7-81.4)岁,女性 292 人(55%)。两组患者的甲状腺素水平基线中位数(IQR)均为 5.80(5.10-7.00)mIU/L;最后一次就诊时,安慰剂组为 4.97(3.90-6.35)mIU/L,左旋甲状腺素组为 3.24(2.49-4.41)mIU/L。治疗后,两组在总体满意度(平均差 [CI] -1.1 [-4.5 to 2.1],P = 0.48)和其他治疗满意度方面没有显著差异。这些结果与甲状腺素基线水平或症状负担无关。在试验后希望继续服药(左甲状腺素 35% 对安慰剂 27%)、不希望继续服药(左甲状腺素 27% 对安慰剂 30%)或不知道继续服药(左甲状腺素 37% 对安慰剂 42%)的参与者人数方面,没有发现重大差异(p = 0.14)。在基线甲减症状负担较重的亚群中,使用左甲状腺素的患者比使用安慰剂的患者更希望在试验后继续服药(平均差 [CI]:-21.1% [-35.6% to -6.5%])。结论这些来自两项研究性试验的汇总数据显示,接受左甲状腺素或安慰剂治疗的老年人在治疗满意度方面没有重大差异。这一发现对开始使用左甲状腺素治疗 SCH 的决策具有重要意义。我们的研究结果总体上支持不对患有 SCH 的老年人常规处方左甲状腺素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
期刊最新文献
Examining Why Thyroid Cancer Incidence Is High in Women. Differential Ultrasound Rates Mirror Sex Disparities in Thyroid Cancer. Irwin Klein, MD (1946-2024). Surgical and Pathological Challenges in Thyroidectomy after Thermal Ablation of Thyroid Nodules. Association Between Environmental Air Pollution and Thyroid Cancer and Nodules: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1