Older Adults' Perceptions of the 2019 Canada's Food Guide: A Qualitative Study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-05 DOI:10.3148/cjdpr-2023-029
Virginie Drolet-Labelle, Danielle Laurin, Alexandra Bédard, Vicky Drapeau, Sophie Desroches
{"title":"Older Adults' Perceptions of the 2019 Canada's Food Guide: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Virginie Drolet-Labelle, Danielle Laurin, Alexandra Bédard, Vicky Drapeau, Sophie Desroches","doi":"10.3148/cjdpr-2023-029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Major changes were made to Canada's Food Guide (CFG) in 2019. This study aimed to understand the perceptions of older adults toward this newest version.<b>Methods:</b> Older adults were invited to participate via newsletters sent to older adults and retirees' organizations in the Province of Quebec. Participants completed an online survey about their baseline familiarity with the 2019 CFG using a 5-point Likert scale and took part in an individual semi-structured online interview, which explored their perceptions toward the 2019 CFG. A thematic qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts was performed.<b>Results:</b> Fifty-eight older adults (>65 years, 30 women, 28 men, including 19 consumers and 39 non-consumers of plant-based protein (PBP) foods) participated in the study. Older adults were mostly familiar with the 2019 CFG and had a positive perception of its features. They appreciated the design, proposed recipes, and healthy eating recommendations. Perceptions about the three food groups were mixed, mainly regarding the decreased emphasis on dairy products. Some appreciated that animal proteins were less prominent, while others raised issues on how to integrate PBP into their diet. Perceptions appeared to be influenced by sex and PBP consumption.<b>Conclusion:</b> Older adults in the Province of Quebec view most of the 2019 CFG recommendations positively. Our observations may be useful to dietitians and public health practitioners when developing strategies to improve adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":56135,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":"111-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2023-029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Major changes were made to Canada's Food Guide (CFG) in 2019. This study aimed to understand the perceptions of older adults toward this newest version.Methods: Older adults were invited to participate via newsletters sent to older adults and retirees' organizations in the Province of Quebec. Participants completed an online survey about their baseline familiarity with the 2019 CFG using a 5-point Likert scale and took part in an individual semi-structured online interview, which explored their perceptions toward the 2019 CFG. A thematic qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts was performed.Results: Fifty-eight older adults (>65 years, 30 women, 28 men, including 19 consumers and 39 non-consumers of plant-based protein (PBP) foods) participated in the study. Older adults were mostly familiar with the 2019 CFG and had a positive perception of its features. They appreciated the design, proposed recipes, and healthy eating recommendations. Perceptions about the three food groups were mixed, mainly regarding the decreased emphasis on dairy products. Some appreciated that animal proteins were less prominent, while others raised issues on how to integrate PBP into their diet. Perceptions appeared to be influenced by sex and PBP consumption.Conclusion: Older adults in the Province of Quebec view most of the 2019 CFG recommendations positively. Our observations may be useful to dietitians and public health practitioners when developing strategies to improve adherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人对 2019 年《加拿大食品指南》的看法:定性研究。
目的:2019 年,《加拿大食品指南》(CFG)发生了重大变化。本研究旨在了解老年人对这一最新版本的看法:方法:通过向魁北克省的老年人和退休人员组织发送通讯,邀请老年人参与。参与者使用 5 点李克特量表完成了关于他们对 2019 CFG 基准熟悉程度的在线调查,并参加了个人半结构化在线访谈,以探讨他们对 2019 CFG 的看法。我们对访谈记录进行了专题定性分析:58位老年人(65岁以上,30位女性,28位男性,包括19位植物性蛋白质(PBP)食品消费者和39位非消费者)参与了研究。老年人大多熟悉 2019 CFG,并对其功能有积极的看法。他们对设计、拟议食谱和健康饮食建议表示赞赏。对三个食品类别的看法不一,主要是对奶制品的重视程度有所下降。一些人对动物蛋白不那么突出表示赞赏,而另一些人则提出了如何将 PBP 纳入饮食的问题。人们的看法似乎受到性别和 PBP 消费量的影响:结论:魁北克省的老年人对 2019 年 CFG 建议的看法大多是积极的。我们的观察结果可能对营养师和公共卫生从业人员制定改善建议遵守情况的策略有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal considers manuscripts for publication that focus on applied food and nutrition research with direct application to the Canadian healthcare system and other contributions relevant to Canadian dietetic practice. The Journal does not publish market research studies, author opinions or animal studies. Manuscripts may be in English or French.
期刊最新文献
Parent/Caregiver Perceptions of the Good Food for Learning Universal School Lunch Program in Canada. From Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion to Justice: Calling in for Collective Learning and Action on Racism in Dietetics. Exploring the Social Determinants of Health in Nutrition Care for South Asian Communities: A Narrative Review. Examination of the Feelings and Experiences of Postpartum Mothers Engaging with Social Media: A Qualitative Study. Identifying and Mapping Canadian Registered Dietitians' Perceptions and Knowledge of and Experiences with Weight-Related Evidence: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1