Sex Differences in Bleeding Risk Associated With Antithrombotic Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Circulation reports Pub Date : 2024-03-05 eCollection Date: 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0015
Yoshimi Numao, Saeko Takahashi, Yoko M Nakao, Emi Tajima, Satsuki Noma, Ayaka Endo, Junko Honye, Yayoi Tsukada
{"title":"Sex Differences in Bleeding Risk Associated With Antithrombotic Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Yoshimi Numao, Saeko Takahashi, Yoko M Nakao, Emi Tajima, Satsuki Noma, Ayaka Endo, Junko Honye, Yayoi Tsukada","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Antithrombotic therapy is crucial for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but women with CVD may face increased bleeding complications post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) under antithrombotic therapy. However, women are often underrepresented in clinical trials in this field, so evidence for sex-specific recommendations is lacking. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> A search on PubMed was conducted for English-language articles addressing bleeding complications and antithrombotic therapy in women. Despite women potentially showing higher baseline platelet responsiveness than men, the clinical implications remain unclear. Concerning antiplatelet therapy post-PCI, although women have an elevated bleeding risk in the acute phase, no sex differences were observed in the chronic phase. However, women require specific considerations for factors such as age, renal function, and weight when determining the dose and duration of antiplatelet therapy. Regarding anticoagulation post-PCI, direct oral anticoagulants may pose a lower bleeding risk in women compared with warfarin. Concerning triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) post-PCI for patients with atrial fibrillation, there is a lack of evidence on whether sex differences should be considered in the duration and regimen of TAT. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Recent findings on sex differences in post-PCI bleeding complications did not provide enough evidence to recommend specific therapies for women. Further studies are needed to address this gap and recommend optimal antithrombotic therapy post-PCI for women.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"99-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11004037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antithrombotic therapy is crucial for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but women with CVD may face increased bleeding complications post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) under antithrombotic therapy. However, women are often underrepresented in clinical trials in this field, so evidence for sex-specific recommendations is lacking. Methods and Results: A search on PubMed was conducted for English-language articles addressing bleeding complications and antithrombotic therapy in women. Despite women potentially showing higher baseline platelet responsiveness than men, the clinical implications remain unclear. Concerning antiplatelet therapy post-PCI, although women have an elevated bleeding risk in the acute phase, no sex differences were observed in the chronic phase. However, women require specific considerations for factors such as age, renal function, and weight when determining the dose and duration of antiplatelet therapy. Regarding anticoagulation post-PCI, direct oral anticoagulants may pose a lower bleeding risk in women compared with warfarin. Concerning triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) post-PCI for patients with atrial fibrillation, there is a lack of evidence on whether sex differences should be considered in the duration and regimen of TAT. Conclusions: Recent findings on sex differences in post-PCI bleeding complications did not provide enough evidence to recommend specific therapies for women. Further studies are needed to address this gap and recommend optimal antithrombotic therapy post-PCI for women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血栓治疗相关出血风险的性别差异。
背景:抗血栓治疗对心血管疾病(CVD)的二级预防至关重要,但患有心血管疾病的女性在接受抗血栓治疗后可能会面临经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后出血并发症增加的问题。然而,在这一领域的临床试验中,女性的代表性往往不足,因此缺乏针对不同性别提出建议的证据。方法与结果:在 PubMed 上搜索了有关女性出血并发症和抗血栓治疗的英文文章。尽管女性的基线血小板反应性可能高于男性,但其临床意义仍不明确。关于冠状动脉造影术后的抗血小板治疗,虽然女性在急性期出血风险较高,但在慢性期没有观察到性别差异。不过,在确定抗血小板治疗的剂量和持续时间时,女性需要特别考虑年龄、肾功能和体重等因素。关于冠状动脉造影术后的抗凝治疗,与华法林相比,直接口服抗凝剂可能会降低女性的出血风险。关于心房颤动患者PCI术后的三联抗栓疗法(TAT),在TAT的持续时间和治疗方案方面是否应考虑性别差异,目前还缺乏证据。结论:最近关于PCI术后出血并发症性别差异的研究结果并未提供足够的证据来推荐针对女性的特定疗法。需要进一步的研究来弥补这一不足,并为女性推荐最佳的PCI术后抗血栓治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Frailty Prediction Using Electronic Health Records in Hospitalized Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. Outcomes of Older Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Using the Impella Device - Insights From the Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD). Bioprosthetic Valve Positions in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation - Insights From the BPV-AF Registry. Incidence of Angiographic Deterioration Following Inframalleolar Angioplasty and Its Impact on Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Requiring Repeat Intervention. Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation: Ambulatory Heart Groups - A Model From Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1