Fixing a Hole: a retrospective cohort study evaluating HAV, HBV, tetanus screening, and vaccination during hospitalization in persons who use substances.

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-04-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361241245822
Amber C Streifel, Jose Eduardo Rivera Sarti, Monica K Sikka, Michael Conte, Bradie Winders, Cara D Varley
{"title":"<i>Fixing a Hole</i>: a retrospective cohort study evaluating HAV, HBV, tetanus screening, and vaccination during hospitalization in persons who use substances.","authors":"Amber C Streifel, Jose Eduardo Rivera Sarti, Monica K Sikka, Michael Conte, Bradie Winders, Cara D Varley","doi":"10.1177/20499361241245822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rates of serious injection-related infections in persons who use drugs have increased. Resulting admissions are an opportunity for screening and vaccination of preventable infections such as hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and tetanus.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of adults with documented substance use admitted for bacterial infection between July 2015 and March 2020. We evaluated HAV, HBV, and tetanus vaccination status at admission, along with screening for HAV and HBV infection and immunity. We identified the proportion of patients at risk for infection who received HAV, HBV, and tetanus vaccines during admission and patient-level factors associated with vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 280 patients who met our inclusion criteria. Of the 198 (70.7%) patients at risk for HAV, infectious disease providers recommended vaccination for 21 (10.6%) and 15 (7.6%) received HAV vaccine. Of the 174 (62.1%) patients at risk for HBV, infectious disease providers recommended vaccination for 32 (18.3%) and 25 (14.4%) received HBV vaccine. A large proportion of patients (31.4%, 88) had no documentation of prior tetanus vaccination, and infectious disease providers recommended tetanus vaccination for three (1.1%) and five patients (1.8%) received a tetanus booster. Infectious disease consult vaccine recommendations were statistically significantly associated with HAV or HBV vaccination prior to discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over 70% of our population is at risk for one or more of these preventable infections. Efforts are needed to maximize inpatient screening and vaccination for HAV, HBV, and tetanus in patients with barriers to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20499361241245822"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361241245822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rates of serious injection-related infections in persons who use drugs have increased. Resulting admissions are an opportunity for screening and vaccination of preventable infections such as hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and tetanus.

Design and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of adults with documented substance use admitted for bacterial infection between July 2015 and March 2020. We evaluated HAV, HBV, and tetanus vaccination status at admission, along with screening for HAV and HBV infection and immunity. We identified the proportion of patients at risk for infection who received HAV, HBV, and tetanus vaccines during admission and patient-level factors associated with vaccination.

Results: We identified 280 patients who met our inclusion criteria. Of the 198 (70.7%) patients at risk for HAV, infectious disease providers recommended vaccination for 21 (10.6%) and 15 (7.6%) received HAV vaccine. Of the 174 (62.1%) patients at risk for HBV, infectious disease providers recommended vaccination for 32 (18.3%) and 25 (14.4%) received HBV vaccine. A large proportion of patients (31.4%, 88) had no documentation of prior tetanus vaccination, and infectious disease providers recommended tetanus vaccination for three (1.1%) and five patients (1.8%) received a tetanus booster. Infectious disease consult vaccine recommendations were statistically significantly associated with HAV or HBV vaccination prior to discharge.

Conclusion: Over 70% of our population is at risk for one or more of these preventable infections. Efforts are needed to maximize inpatient screening and vaccination for HAV, HBV, and tetanus in patients with barriers to care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修补漏洞:一项回顾性队列研究,评估使用药物者住院期间的 HAV、HBV、破伤风筛查和疫苗接种情况。
背景:吸毒者中与注射相关的严重感染率有所上升。由此导致的入院治疗为筛查和接种甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和破伤风等可预防感染提供了机会:我们对 2015 年 7 月至 2020 年 3 月期间因细菌感染而入院的有药物使用记录的成人进行了回顾性审查。我们评估了入院时的 HAV、HBV 和破伤风疫苗接种情况,以及 HAV 和 HBV 感染和免疫筛查情况。我们确定了有感染风险的患者在入院时接种 HAV、HBV 和破伤风疫苗的比例,以及与接种疫苗相关的患者水平因素:我们确定了 280 名符合纳入标准的患者。在 198 名(70.7%)有感染 HAV 风险的患者中,传染病医生建议 21 名(10.6%)患者接种疫苗,15 名(7.6%)患者接种了 HAV 疫苗。在 174 名(62.1%)有感染 HBV 风险的患者中,传染病医生建议 32 名(18.3%)患者接种疫苗,25 名(14.4%)患者接种了 HBV 疫苗。大部分患者(31.4%,88 人)没有破伤风疫苗接种记录,传染病医生建议为 3 名患者(1.1%)接种破伤风疫苗,5 名患者(1.8%)接种了破伤风强化疫苗。传染病咨询机构的疫苗接种建议与出院前接种甲型肝炎病毒或乙型肝炎病毒疫苗有明显的统计学关联:结论:我国超过 70% 的人口面临一种或多种可预防感染的风险。需要努力最大限度地对有护理障碍的住院病人进行 HAV、HBV 和破伤风筛查和疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social disparities on PrEP use and awareness among sexual and gender minorities using smartphones in India. Challenges in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. braziliensis in four travelers: a case series. Fungal Infections, Treatment and Antifungal Resistance: The Sub-Saharan African Context. Polio: Background and perspective on how international travel can be made safe against polio. Emerging trends in fungal endocarditis: clinical complexity, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic implications - a case series and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1