Outer-context determinants on the implementation of school-based interventions for LGBTQ+ adolescents.

IF 2.6 Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2024-04-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895241249417
Daniel Shattuck, Cathleen E Willging, Jeffery Peterson, Mary M Ramos
{"title":"Outer-context determinants on the implementation of school-based interventions for LGBTQ+ adolescents.","authors":"Daniel Shattuck, Cathleen E Willging, Jeffery Peterson, Mary M Ramos","doi":"10.1177/26334895241249417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schools are critical venues for supporting LGBTQ+ youth well-being. Implementing LGBTQ-supportive practices can decrease experiences of stigmatization, discrimination, and victimization that lead to adverse mental health outcomes like anxiety, depression, and suicidality. However, schools are also subject to a wide range of outer-context pressures that may influence their priorities and implementation of LGBTQ-supportive practices. We assessed the role of emergent outer-context determinants in the context of a 5-year cluster randomized controlled trial to study the implementation of LGBTQ-supportive evidence-informed practices (EIPs) in New Mexico high schools.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using an iterative coding approach, we analyzed qualitative data from annual interviews with school professionals involved in EIP implementation efforts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis yielded three categories of outer-context determinants that created challenges and opportunities for implementation: (a) social barriers related to heterocentrism, cisgenderism, and religious conservatism; (b) local, state, and national policy and political discourse; and (c) crisis events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By exploring the implications of outer-context determinants for the uptake of LGBTQ-supportive practices, we demonstrate that these elements are dynamic-not simply reducible to barriers or facilitators-and that assessing outer-context determinants shaping implementation environments is crucial for addressing LGBTQ health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"26334895241249417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11044576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895241249417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Schools are critical venues for supporting LGBTQ+ youth well-being. Implementing LGBTQ-supportive practices can decrease experiences of stigmatization, discrimination, and victimization that lead to adverse mental health outcomes like anxiety, depression, and suicidality. However, schools are also subject to a wide range of outer-context pressures that may influence their priorities and implementation of LGBTQ-supportive practices. We assessed the role of emergent outer-context determinants in the context of a 5-year cluster randomized controlled trial to study the implementation of LGBTQ-supportive evidence-informed practices (EIPs) in New Mexico high schools.

Method: Using an iterative coding approach, we analyzed qualitative data from annual interviews with school professionals involved in EIP implementation efforts.

Results: The analysis yielded three categories of outer-context determinants that created challenges and opportunities for implementation: (a) social barriers related to heterocentrism, cisgenderism, and religious conservatism; (b) local, state, and national policy and political discourse; and (c) crisis events.

Conclusions: By exploring the implications of outer-context determinants for the uptake of LGBTQ-supportive practices, we demonstrate that these elements are dynamic-not simply reducible to barriers or facilitators-and that assessing outer-context determinants shaping implementation environments is crucial for addressing LGBTQ health equity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对 LGBTQ+ 青少年实施校本干预的外部环境决定因素。
背景:学校是支持 LGBTQ+ 青少年健康成长的重要场所。实施支持 LGBTQ 的措施可以减少导致焦虑、抑郁和自杀等不良心理健康后果的污名化、歧视和伤害经历。然而,学校也会受到各种外部环境的压力,这些压力可能会影响学校对 LGBTQ 支持性实践的优先考虑和实施。我们在一项为期 5 年的分组随机对照试验中评估了新出现的外部环境决定因素的作用,该试验旨在研究在新墨西哥州高中实施支持 LGBTQ 的循证实践(EIPs)的情况:我们采用迭代编码方法,分析了与参与 EIP 实施工作的学校专业人员进行年度访谈所获得的定性数据:结果:分析得出了三类为实施工作带来挑战和机遇的外部环境决定因素:(a) 与异性中心主义、顺性别主义和宗教保守主义有关的社会障碍;(b) 地方、州和国家政策及政治言论;(c) 危机事件:通过探索外部环境决定因素对采用 LGBTQ 支持性实践的影响,我们证明了这些因素是动态的,不能简单地归结为障碍或促进因素,而且评估影响实施环境的外部环境决定因素对于解决 LGBTQ 健康公平问题至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining Interrelationships Between Implementation Outcomes in the Context of Traumatic Brain Injury Screening in Behavioral Health Treatment. Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-Based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to Document Modifications to a Multilevel Deimplementation Strategy Aimed at Reducing Opioid Prescribing for Chronic Pain. Using Incentivization as a Strategy to Improve Implementation of a Motivational Interviewing Brief Intervention for Substance Use Disorders in HIV Settings: Results of a 26-Site Parallel Groups Cluster-Randomized Type-3 Hybrid Trial. Exploring Factors Across Levels Impacting Educators' Selection of Evidence-Based Practices for Autistic Students. Real-World Implementation and Impact of Digital CBT for Insomnia on Healthcare Utilization: A Propensity-Matched Controlled Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1