The sensitivity of a neck CT scan in detecting pneumothoraces in nonpenetrating trauma.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-01
R Byebwa, E E Nweke, M S Moeng
{"title":"The sensitivity of a neck CT scan in detecting pneumothoraces in nonpenetrating trauma.","authors":"R Byebwa, E E Nweke, M S Moeng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The trauma-related pneumothorax is a common intrathoracic injury and can go undetected with detrimental outcomes. Chest computed tomography (CT) investigation in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC) is not always readily available during emergency situations and increased workloads. However, alternative investigations all have limitations in including pneumothoraces. Patients may have trauma indications for CT of the head and neck. The neck CT scan may hold an extra potential advantage in pneumothorax detection. This study aimed to assess its sensitivity in pneumothorax detection in nonpenetrating trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2021. All adult patients sustaining nonpenetrating injuries, and investigated with chest and neck CT scans were included. The chest CT scan was the gold standard against,which the neck CT scan was compared to determine the accuracy of pneumothorax detection. Stata version 16 was used for descriptive statistical analysis, and a <i>p</i>-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand ninety three were eligible for evaluation; 204 (18.66%) pneumothoraces were detected on chest CT scans, 200 (98.0%) of which were also detected on the neck CT scan, producing a sensitivity of 98.0% (95% CI 95.1-99.5%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 99.6-100%). Most pneumothoraces were detected at T1 level (45.09%), followed by T2 (43.62%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The neck CT scan has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in pneumothorax detection. Thus, it may be used as an additional tool for those who could not receive or do not need a formal chest CT but have an indication for neck CT scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"62 1","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The trauma-related pneumothorax is a common intrathoracic injury and can go undetected with detrimental outcomes. Chest computed tomography (CT) investigation in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC) is not always readily available during emergency situations and increased workloads. However, alternative investigations all have limitations in including pneumothoraces. Patients may have trauma indications for CT of the head and neck. The neck CT scan may hold an extra potential advantage in pneumothorax detection. This study aimed to assess its sensitivity in pneumothorax detection in nonpenetrating trauma.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2021. All adult patients sustaining nonpenetrating injuries, and investigated with chest and neck CT scans were included. The chest CT scan was the gold standard against,which the neck CT scan was compared to determine the accuracy of pneumothorax detection. Stata version 16 was used for descriptive statistical analysis, and a p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: One thousand ninety three were eligible for evaluation; 204 (18.66%) pneumothoraces were detected on chest CT scans, 200 (98.0%) of which were also detected on the neck CT scan, producing a sensitivity of 98.0% (95% CI 95.1-99.5%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 99.6-100%). Most pneumothoraces were detected at T1 level (45.09%), followed by T2 (43.62%).

Conclusion: The neck CT scan has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in pneumothorax detection. Thus, it may be used as an additional tool for those who could not receive or do not need a formal chest CT but have an indication for neck CT scans.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈部 CT 扫描在非穿透性创伤中检测气胸的灵敏度。
背景:与创伤相关的气胸是一种常见的胸腔内损伤,可能会被忽视而造成严重后果。在中低收入国家(LMIC),由于紧急情况和工作量增加,胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)检查并不总是随时可用。然而,其他检查方法在包括气胸方面都有局限性。患者可能有外伤指征,需要进行头颈部 CT 扫描。颈部 CT 扫描在气胸检测中可能具有额外的潜在优势。本研究旨在评估颈部 CT 扫描在非穿透性创伤中检测气胸的灵敏度:方法:2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日进行了一项回顾性研究。研究纳入了所有接受胸部和颈部 CT 扫描检查的非穿透性创伤成年患者。胸部 CT 扫描是金标准,与颈部 CT 扫描进行比较,以确定气胸检测的准确性。使用Stata 16版本进行描述性统计分析,P值在0.05以内为有统计学意义:符合评估条件的有 1903 人;胸部 CT 扫描发现了 204 个(18.66%)气胸,其中 200 个(98.0%)在颈部 CT 扫描中也被发现,灵敏度为 98.0%(95% CI 95.1-99.5%),特异性为 100%(95% CI 99.6-100%)。大多数气胸是在 T1 水平(45.09%)发现的,其次是 T2 水平(43.62%):结论:颈部 CT 扫描在气胸检测中具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。结论:颈部 CT 扫描在气胸检测方面具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,因此,对于那些无法接受或不需要接受正规胸部 CT 扫描但有颈部 CT 扫描指征的患者,颈部 CT 扫描可作为一种额外的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
A case report on lingual schwannoma. Adult small bowel volvulus - a case series. Can we trust the data? - the data detective. Endoscopy-induced complication of barotrauma with concomitant benign pneumoperitoneum. Late presentation of Bochdalek hernia in children - experience at a single centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1