Awareness and Self-Reported Knowledge and Training on Nutrition in Older People among Primary Care Practitioners.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Frailty & Aging Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jfa.2024.11
L Rodríguez-Mañas, J M Moreno-Villares, J Álvarez Hernández, A A Romero Secín, M L López Díaz-Ufano, F Suárez González, A Costa-Grille, J López-Miranda, J M Fernández-Garcia
{"title":"Awareness and Self-Reported Knowledge and Training on Nutrition in Older People among Primary Care Practitioners.","authors":"L Rodríguez-Mañas, J M Moreno-Villares, J Álvarez Hernández, A A Romero Secín, M L López Díaz-Ufano, F Suárez González, A Costa-Grille, J López-Miranda, J M Fernández-Garcia","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the awareness and training of primary care physicians on nutrition in older patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational, real-world data survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary Care.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred sixty-two physicians, generalists and specialists, working in primary care.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Participants received an online questionnaire with 18 questions concerning the importance of nutrition, degree of knowledge, needs, and training in nutrition. The results were evaluated using univariate descriptive analysis, with a percentage for each chosen answer. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate if answers were related to training in nutrition and professional experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43.2% of participants reported that nutrition is very important in individuals over 65 years old, and 90% were aware of the importance of nutrition in healthy aging. Nutritional problems affect 30 to 50% of patients, according to 44.7% of participants. 89.2% agree about the need for nutritional assessment in older patients; however, the professionals believe they should be better prepared. Two out of three respondents consider the training received in nutrition during their undergraduate course or continuing medical education as deficient. Time of professional practice was mainly associated with conceptual facts, while continuing medical education did with practical issues, mainly the use of screening and diagnostic tools [FRAIL (OR: 3.16; 95%IC: 1.55-6.46), MNA-SF (OR: 6.455; 95%IC: 2.980-13.981) and SARC-F (OR: 3.063; 95%IC: 1.284-7.309)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although primary care professionals are aware of the importance of nutrition in older patients, there are still gaps in daily practice that could be improved by developing educational strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the awareness and training of primary care physicians on nutrition in older patients.

Design: Observational, real-world data survey.

Setting: Primary Care.

Participants: One hundred sixty-two physicians, generalists and specialists, working in primary care.

Measurements: Participants received an online questionnaire with 18 questions concerning the importance of nutrition, degree of knowledge, needs, and training in nutrition. The results were evaluated using univariate descriptive analysis, with a percentage for each chosen answer. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate if answers were related to training in nutrition and professional experience.

Results: 43.2% of participants reported that nutrition is very important in individuals over 65 years old, and 90% were aware of the importance of nutrition in healthy aging. Nutritional problems affect 30 to 50% of patients, according to 44.7% of participants. 89.2% agree about the need for nutritional assessment in older patients; however, the professionals believe they should be better prepared. Two out of three respondents consider the training received in nutrition during their undergraduate course or continuing medical education as deficient. Time of professional practice was mainly associated with conceptual facts, while continuing medical education did with practical issues, mainly the use of screening and diagnostic tools [FRAIL (OR: 3.16; 95%IC: 1.55-6.46), MNA-SF (OR: 6.455; 95%IC: 2.980-13.981) and SARC-F (OR: 3.063; 95%IC: 1.284-7.309)].

Conclusion: Although primary care professionals are aware of the importance of nutrition in older patients, there are still gaps in daily practice that could be improved by developing educational strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健从业人员对老年人营养问题的认识、自述知识和培训。
目的评估初级保健医生对老年患者营养问题的认识和培训情况:观察性、真实世界数据调查:参与人员: 162 名在基层医疗机构工作的全科医生和专科医生:162 名从事初级保健工作的全科医生和专科医生:参与者收到了一份在线问卷,其中包含 18 个问题,涉及营养的重要性、营养知识的掌握程度、需求和培训。采用单变量描述性分析法对结果进行评估,每个选择答案的百分比。使用逻辑回归模型评估答案是否与营养培训和专业经验有关:43.2%的参与者表示营养对 65 岁以上的老年人非常重要,90%的参与者意识到营养对健康老龄化的重要性。44.7%的参与者表示,营养问题影响了30%至50%的患者。89.2%的人同意有必要对老年患者进行营养评估,但专业人员认为他们应该做好更充分的准备。三分之二的受访者认为,他们在本科或继续医学教育期间接受的营养学培训存在不足。专业实践时间主要与概念性事实有关,而继续医学教育则与实际问题有关,主要是筛查和诊断工具的使用[FRAIL(OR:3.16;95%IC:1.55-6.46),MNA-SF(OR:6.455;95%IC:2.980-13.981)和 SARC-F(OR:3.063;95%IC:1.284-7.309)]:尽管初级保健专业人员已意识到营养对老年患者的重要性,但在日常实践中仍存在不足,可通过制定教育策略加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
期刊最新文献
Impact of Cohabitation during Confinement on Older Adults' Negative Affect: What Specificity of Life as a Couple? Relationship of Frailty, Nutritional Status and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Mexico City Nursing Home Residents. A Judo-Based Exercise Program to Reduce Falls and Frailty Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Feasibility Study. The Effect of Frailty on Independent Living After Surgery: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Frailty-Related Factors among Women Living with and without HIV Aged 40 Years and Older. The Women's Interagency HIV Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1