An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Distance Learning on Nutrition Quality of Hemodialysis Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of caring sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-30 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.34172/jcs.2024.33055
Mahdieh Rafiee, Maryam Khandan
{"title":"An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Distance Learning on Nutrition Quality of Hemodialysis Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Mahdieh Rafiee, Maryam Khandan","doi":"10.34172/jcs.2024.33055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has limited hemodialysis patient's attendance in healthcare centers and receiving diet education. This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of distance learning on the nutrition quality of hemodialysis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the single-blind randomized clinical trial, 60 patients undergoing hemodialysis were randomly divided into control (n=30) and experimental (n=30) groups. Before and after the intervention, Dialysis Malnutrition Score (DMS), Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (MIS) (primary outcome), albumin, the total iron-binding capacity of the blood (TIBC), and body mass index (BMI) (Secondary outcome) were investigated. The experimental group received educational content through social networks for three months, whereas the control group received routine care and training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean of DMS, MIS, albumin, and TIBC before the intervention. Pre-test BMI had a confounding effect; therefore, an analysis of covariance was performed to eliminate that effect. This analysis showed significant differences in the post-test mean DMS, MIS, TIBC, and BMI between the two groups. In the control group, significant differences were observed in MIS and BMI toward deterioration. The results also indicated a significant relationship between education level and age with TIBC and between marital status and albumin index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distance learning can be considered by healthcare managers and police makers as a suitable alternative to the classic face-to-face learning method to enhance hemodialysis patients' nutrition quality during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":516530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of caring sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11036171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of caring sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2024.33055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has limited hemodialysis patient's attendance in healthcare centers and receiving diet education. This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of distance learning on the nutrition quality of hemodialysis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: In the single-blind randomized clinical trial, 60 patients undergoing hemodialysis were randomly divided into control (n=30) and experimental (n=30) groups. Before and after the intervention, Dialysis Malnutrition Score (DMS), Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (MIS) (primary outcome), albumin, the total iron-binding capacity of the blood (TIBC), and body mass index (BMI) (Secondary outcome) were investigated. The experimental group received educational content through social networks for three months, whereas the control group received routine care and training.

Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean of DMS, MIS, albumin, and TIBC before the intervention. Pre-test BMI had a confounding effect; therefore, an analysis of covariance was performed to eliminate that effect. This analysis showed significant differences in the post-test mean DMS, MIS, TIBC, and BMI between the two groups. In the control group, significant differences were observed in MIS and BMI toward deterioration. The results also indicated a significant relationship between education level and age with TIBC and between marital status and albumin index.

Conclusion: Distance learning can be considered by healthcare managers and police makers as a suitable alternative to the classic face-to-face learning method to enhance hemodialysis patients' nutrition quality during the COVID-19 pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间远程学习对血液透析患者营养质量的影响调查:单盲随机临床试验。
简介:COVID-19 大流行限制了血液透析患者到医疗中心就诊和接受饮食教育。本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间远程学习对血液透析患者营养质量的影响:在单盲随机临床试验中,60 名血液透析患者被随机分为对照组(30 人)和实验组(30 人)。干预前后,调查透析营养不良评分(DMS)、营养不良-炎症评分(MIS)(主要结果)、白蛋白、血液总铁结合能力(TIBC)和体重指数(BMI)(次要结果)。实验组通过社交网络接受为期三个月的教育内容,而对照组则接受常规护理和培训:结果:干预前,两组的 DMS、MIS、白蛋白和 TIBC 平均值无明显差异。测试前的体重指数会产生混杂效应,因此进行了协方差分析以消除该效应。该分析表明,两组的测试后平均 DMS、MIS、TIBC 和 BMI 存在显著差异。在对照组中,观察到 MIS 和 BMI 有明显的恶化差异。结果还表明,受教育程度和年龄与 TIBC 之间以及婚姻状况与白蛋白指数之间存在明显关系:医疗保健管理人员和警务人员可以考虑将远程学习作为传统面授学习方法的一种合适替代方法,以提高 COVID-19 大流行期间血液透析患者的营养质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Investigation of Death Anxiety and Spiritual Well-Being Levels of Family Members of Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit. Barriers and Facilitators during Community Reintegration of People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Qualitative Study. The Unmet Needs of Women with Maternal Near Miss Experience: A Qualitative Study. An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Distance Learning on Nutrition Quality of Hemodialysis Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Motivation for Healing Scale in Patients with Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1