Treatment of Post-Burn Leucoderma With Superficial Dermabrasion Followed by Suction Blister Epidermal Grafting: A Clinical Prospective Study.

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2023-06-30 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01
A S Ali, W H Mahmoud, M I Elsawaf, N Elmelegy
{"title":"Treatment of Post-Burn Leucoderma With Superficial Dermabrasion Followed by Suction Blister Epidermal Grafting: A Clinical Prospective Study.","authors":"A S Ali, W H Mahmoud, M I Elsawaf, N Elmelegy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-burn leucoderma patients remain the most challenging to treat because they have two distinct issues: textural changes and hypopigmentation that must be managed simultaneously. A variety of surgical techniques have been used with variable outcome. This prospective study evaluated the efficacy of superficial dermabrasion followed by suction blister epidermal grafting (SBEG) in post-burn leucoderma treatment. Twenty patients, 15 females and 5 males, ages ranging from 18 to 52 years, all having post-burn leucoderma ranging from 10 to 36 months, were included. The recipient sites were prepared by superficial dermabrasion. The Chinese cupping device was used for blister induction. Blister formation times, as well as the number of blisters, were noted. Complications, extent of the repigmentation, treatment efficacy and color matching were recorded. The mean time taken for blister formation was 91.75±10.29 min. The number of blisters harvested for each case ranged from 2 to 9. Regarding complications, 1 had partial graft loss, 3 developed perigraft halo at the recipient site, and all patients had temporary hyperpigmented circular macules at the donor sites. After a mean follow up period of 8.5±1.73 months, repigmentation percentage ranged from 40 to 100% with good color matching. Treatment efficacy was excellent in 3 cases (15%), good in 12 cases (60%), fair in 4 cases (20%), and poor in 1 case (5%). As regards patient satisfaction, 15 patients (75%) were satisfied, while 5 patients (25%) weren't. Combined superficial dermabrasion and SBEG appears to be a simple and cost-effective surgical treatment modality for localized post-burn leucoderma.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"36 2","pages":"150-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-burn leucoderma patients remain the most challenging to treat because they have two distinct issues: textural changes and hypopigmentation that must be managed simultaneously. A variety of surgical techniques have been used with variable outcome. This prospective study evaluated the efficacy of superficial dermabrasion followed by suction blister epidermal grafting (SBEG) in post-burn leucoderma treatment. Twenty patients, 15 females and 5 males, ages ranging from 18 to 52 years, all having post-burn leucoderma ranging from 10 to 36 months, were included. The recipient sites were prepared by superficial dermabrasion. The Chinese cupping device was used for blister induction. Blister formation times, as well as the number of blisters, were noted. Complications, extent of the repigmentation, treatment efficacy and color matching were recorded. The mean time taken for blister formation was 91.75±10.29 min. The number of blisters harvested for each case ranged from 2 to 9. Regarding complications, 1 had partial graft loss, 3 developed perigraft halo at the recipient site, and all patients had temporary hyperpigmented circular macules at the donor sites. After a mean follow up period of 8.5±1.73 months, repigmentation percentage ranged from 40 to 100% with good color matching. Treatment efficacy was excellent in 3 cases (15%), good in 12 cases (60%), fair in 4 cases (20%), and poor in 1 case (5%). As regards patient satisfaction, 15 patients (75%) were satisfied, while 5 patients (25%) weren't. Combined superficial dermabrasion and SBEG appears to be a simple and cost-effective surgical treatment modality for localized post-burn leucoderma.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用表皮磨削术治疗烧伤后白皮症,然后进行吸疱表皮移植:临床前瞻性研究。
烧伤后白皮症患者的治疗仍然最具挑战性,因为他们有两个不同的问题:纹理变化和色素沉着,必须同时处理。目前已经使用了多种手术方法,但效果不一。这项前瞻性研究评估了表皮磨削术和吸疱表皮移植术(SBEG)在烧伤后白皮症治疗中的疗效。研究共纳入了 20 名烧伤后白皮症患者,其中女性 15 人,男性 5 人,年龄从 18 岁到 52 岁不等,病程从 10 个月到 36 个月不等。受术部位通过表皮磨削术进行准备。使用中国拔罐器诱发水疱。研究人员记录了水疱形成的时间以及水疱的数量。并记录了并发症、再色素沉着的程度、治疗效果和配色情况。水疱形成的平均时间为(91.75±10.29)分钟。每个病例收获的水泡数量从 2 个到 9 个不等。在并发症方面,1 例患者出现部分移植物脱落,3 例患者在受体部位出现移植物周围晕轮,所有患者在供体部位出现暂时性色素沉着环形斑。平均随访时间为(8.5±1.73)个月,再色素沉着的比例从 40% 到 100% 不等,且颜色匹配良好。疗效优3例(15%),良12例(60%),一般4例(20%),差1例(5%)。在患者满意度方面,15 名患者(75%)表示满意,5 名患者(25%)表示不满意。表皮磨削术和 SBEG 联合疗法似乎是治疗局部烧伤后白皮症的一种简单而经济的手术治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Epidemiology of burns in mayotte in 2022: an exhaustive study on a particular health area]. [Intraoperative iatrogenic thermal burn: case report and review of operating room fire prevention measures]. [The ambient air and arachis hypogaea (peanut) oil dressing in severe burns in children under 15 years of age at the regional hospital center of dédougou]. Burn hypertrophy scarring assessment based on patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS). Epidemiological trends for burn wound infections in 2020 in albania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1