MAFLD identifies patients with significant hepatic fibrosis better than MASLD.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hepatology International Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s12072-024-10673-7
Ziyan Pan, Said A Al-Busafi, Maheeba Abdulla, Yasser Fouad, Giada Sebastiani, Mohammed Eslam
{"title":"MAFLD identifies patients with significant hepatic fibrosis better than MASLD.","authors":"Ziyan Pan, Said A Al-Busafi, Maheeba Abdulla, Yasser Fouad, Giada Sebastiani, Mohammed Eslam","doi":"10.1007/s12072-024-10673-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Diagnostic criteria for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) have been proposed but not yet validated. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the MASLD definition with the existing criteria for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in identifying patients with significant fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis included a total of 8317 individuals who had complete biochemical and liver ultrasonography data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-2020). In this study, significant fibrosis (≥ F2) was determined by a median liver stiffness of ≥ 8.0 kPa. To identify independent factors associated with significant fibrosis, multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MAFLD (OR 3.44; 95% CI 2.88-4.12; P < 0.0001) has a trend for stronger and independent association with significant fibrosis compared to MASLD (OR 2.63; 95% CI 2.22-3.11; P < 0.0001). Non-MASLD MAFLD is independently associated with a 14.28-fold higher odds of significant fibrosis compared to non-MAFLD MASLD. The sensitivity for detecting significant fibrosis for MAFLD and MASLD was 76.23% vs 69.94%, respectively. The performance of MAFLD remains consistent in a sub-analysis of patients with no or mild alcohol intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The definition of MAFLD provides a more precise identification of individuals who have both fatty liver and significant fibrosis, assessed by non-invasive tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":"964-972"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10673-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Diagnostic criteria for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) have been proposed but not yet validated. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the MASLD definition with the existing criteria for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in identifying patients with significant fibrosis.

Methods: The analysis included a total of 8317 individuals who had complete biochemical and liver ultrasonography data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-2020). In this study, significant fibrosis (≥ F2) was determined by a median liver stiffness of ≥ 8.0 kPa. To identify independent factors associated with significant fibrosis, multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied.

Results: MAFLD (OR 3.44; 95% CI 2.88-4.12; P < 0.0001) has a trend for stronger and independent association with significant fibrosis compared to MASLD (OR 2.63; 95% CI 2.22-3.11; P < 0.0001). Non-MASLD MAFLD is independently associated with a 14.28-fold higher odds of significant fibrosis compared to non-MAFLD MASLD. The sensitivity for detecting significant fibrosis for MAFLD and MASLD was 76.23% vs 69.94%, respectively. The performance of MAFLD remains consistent in a sub-analysis of patients with no or mild alcohol intake.

Conclusions: The definition of MAFLD provides a more precise identification of individuals who have both fatty liver and significant fibrosis, assessed by non-invasive tests.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与 MASLD 相比,MAFLD 能更好地识别严重肝纤维化患者。
背景和目的:代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)的诊断标准已经提出,但尚未得到验证。本研究旨在比较代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)定义与现有代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)标准在识别明显纤维化患者方面的诊断准确性:分析对象包括全国健康与营养调查(2017-2020年)中拥有完整生化和肝脏超声波检查数据的共8317人。在本研究中,明显纤维化(≥ F2)由肝脏硬度中值≥ 8.0 kPa确定。为了确定与明显纤维化相关的独立因素,采用了多变量逻辑回归分析:MAFLD(OR 3.44;95% CI 2.88-4.12;P 结论:MAFLD的定义为肝纤维化患者提供了一个重要的评估指标:MAFLD的定义能更准确地识别同时患有脂肪肝和明显肝纤维化(通过无创检测评估)的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology International
Hepatology International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders. Types of articles published: -Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research -Review Articles -Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment -Clinical cases, images -Selected Author Summaries -Video Submissions
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of durvalumab rechallenge in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to prior anti-PD-1 therapy. The dynamic patterns of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and its severity and risk of cardiovascular disease. APASL clinical practice guidelines on systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma-2024. Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for patients with HCC-lot more to learn. In response to "Key considerations in portal vein thrombosis management".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1