Impact of tumor size on overall survival and cancer-specific survival of early-onset colon and rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04644-5
Wanbin Yin, Maorun Zhang, Zhe Ji, Xiaoping Li, Shiyao Zhang, Gang Liu
{"title":"Impact of tumor size on overall survival and cancer-specific survival of early-onset colon and rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Wanbin Yin, Maorun Zhang, Zhe Ji, Xiaoping Li, Shiyao Zhang, Gang Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04644-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of tumor size on survival in early-onset colon and rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Early-onset colon and rectal cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Tumor size was analyzed as both continuous and categorical variables. Several statistical techniques, including restricted cubic spline (RCS), Cox proportional hazard model, subgroup analysis, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were employed to demonstrate the association between tumor size and overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of early-onset colon and rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen thousand five hundred fifty-one (76.7%) early-onset colon and 5323 (23.3%) rectal cancer patients were included. RCS analysis confirmed a linear association between tumor size and survival. Patients with a tumor size > 5 cm had worse OS and CSS, compared to those with a tumor size ≤ 5 cm for both early-onset colon and rectal cancer. Notably, subgroup analysis showed that a smaller tumor size (≤ 50 mm) was associated with worse survival in stage II early-onset colon cancer, although not statistically significant. After PSM, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the survival of patients with tumor size ≤ 50 mm was better than that of patients with tumor size > 50 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with tumors larger than 5 cm were associated with worse survival in early-onset colon and rectal cancer. However, smaller tumor size may indicate a more biologically aggressive phenotype, correlating with poorer survival in stage II early-onset colon cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04644-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of tumor size on survival in early-onset colon and rectal cancer.

Methods: Early-onset colon and rectal cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Tumor size was analyzed as both continuous and categorical variables. Several statistical techniques, including restricted cubic spline (RCS), Cox proportional hazard model, subgroup analysis, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were employed to demonstrate the association between tumor size and overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of early-onset colon and rectal cancer.

Results: Seventeen thousand five hundred fifty-one (76.7%) early-onset colon and 5323 (23.3%) rectal cancer patients were included. RCS analysis confirmed a linear association between tumor size and survival. Patients with a tumor size > 5 cm had worse OS and CSS, compared to those with a tumor size ≤ 5 cm for both early-onset colon and rectal cancer. Notably, subgroup analysis showed that a smaller tumor size (≤ 50 mm) was associated with worse survival in stage II early-onset colon cancer, although not statistically significant. After PSM, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the survival of patients with tumor size ≤ 50 mm was better than that of patients with tumor size > 50 mm.

Conclusion: Patients with tumors larger than 5 cm were associated with worse survival in early-onset colon and rectal cancer. However, smaller tumor size may indicate a more biologically aggressive phenotype, correlating with poorer survival in stage II early-onset colon cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤大小对早期结肠癌和直肠癌总生存率和癌症特异性生存率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨肿瘤大小对早期结肠癌和直肠癌患者生存期的影响:2004年至2015年期间,从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定了早期结肠癌和直肠癌患者。肿瘤大小作为连续变量和分类变量进行分析。研究采用了多种统计技术,包括受限立方样条曲线(RCS)、考克斯比例危险模型、亚组分析、倾向评分匹配(PSM)和卡普兰-梅耶尔生存分析,以证明肿瘤大小与早发性结肠癌和直肠癌的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)之间的关系:共纳入了 1.751 万例(76.7%)早期结肠癌患者和 5323 例(23.3%)直肠癌患者。RCS分析证实肿瘤大小与生存率呈线性关系。在早发性结肠癌和直肠癌患者中,与肿瘤大小≤5厘米的患者相比,肿瘤大小>5厘米的患者的OS和CSS均较差。值得注意的是,亚组分析表明,肿瘤大小较小(≤ 50 毫米)与 II 期早发结肠癌患者的生存率较差有关,但无统计学意义。PSM后,Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,肿瘤大小≤50毫米的患者生存率优于肿瘤大小>50毫米的患者:结论:肿瘤大于 5 厘米的早期结肠癌和直肠癌患者生存率较低。结论:肿瘤大于 5 厘米的早期结肠癌和直肠癌患者的生存率较低,但肿瘤体积较小可能表明生物侵袭性较强,与 II 期早期结肠癌患者的生存率较低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer associated with polypectomy during endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal cancer. A multi-docking strategy for robotic LAR and deep pelvic surgery with the Hugo RAS system: experience from a tertiary referral center. Does the initial treatment of primary tumor impact prognosis after recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer? Results from a retrospective cohort analysis. Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Subcutaneous infliximab in Crohn's disease patients with previous immunogenic failure of intravenous infliximab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1