Tracheostomy timing and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective observational study.
{"title":"Tracheostomy timing and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Sachin Pralhad Sasane, Madhavi Mahesh Telang, Zeyad Faroor Alrais, Wasim Shabbir Shaikh, Ghaya Zeyad Alrais, Khalid Ismail Khatib","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_39_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonitis may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring endotracheal intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). There are limited data on the optimum time of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients progressing to ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study of all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who progressed to ARDS requiring MV and undergone tracheostomy. We aimed to conduct a study to observe the impact of tracheostomy on the mortality of these patients and the impact of timing of tracheostomy on outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 162 patients, 128 (79%) were male and 34 (21%) were female. Early group (≤14 days) comprised 37 patients, while 125 patients were included in late group (>14 days). A total of 91 (56%) patients died at the end of this period. Among the patients who died, 21were included in the early group, while the late group comprised the remaining 70 patients. On comparing the patients who died, the duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly different in the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 12 [11-13] vs. 23 [19-28] days, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The number of days to death also differed significantly between the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 28 [21-38] vs. 24 [14-30] days, <i>P</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early tracheostomy is associated with significantly shorter length of ICU stay in COVID-19 patients that have progressed to ARDS. However, the timing of tracheostomy had no influence on the overall mortality rate in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_39_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonitis may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring endotracheal intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). There are limited data on the optimum time of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients progressing to ARDS.
Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who progressed to ARDS requiring MV and undergone tracheostomy. We aimed to conduct a study to observe the impact of tracheostomy on the mortality of these patients and the impact of timing of tracheostomy on outcomes in these patients.
Results: Of the total 162 patients, 128 (79%) were male and 34 (21%) were female. Early group (≤14 days) comprised 37 patients, while 125 patients were included in late group (>14 days). A total of 91 (56%) patients died at the end of this period. Among the patients who died, 21were included in the early group, while the late group comprised the remaining 70 patients. On comparing the patients who died, the duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly different in the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 12 [11-13] vs. 23 [19-28] days, P < 0.001). The number of days to death also differed significantly between the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 28 [21-38] vs. 24 [14-30] days, P = 0.009).
Conclusion: Early tracheostomy is associated with significantly shorter length of ICU stay in COVID-19 patients that have progressed to ARDS. However, the timing of tracheostomy had no influence on the overall mortality rate in these patients.
期刊介绍:
IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.