Tracheostomy timing and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective observational study.

Sachin Pralhad Sasane, Madhavi Mahesh Telang, Zeyad Faroor Alrais, Wasim Shabbir Shaikh, Ghaya Zeyad Alrais, Khalid Ismail Khatib
{"title":"Tracheostomy timing and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Sachin Pralhad Sasane, Madhavi Mahesh Telang, Zeyad Faroor Alrais, Wasim Shabbir Shaikh, Ghaya Zeyad Alrais, Khalid Ismail Khatib","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_39_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonitis may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring endotracheal intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). There are limited data on the optimum time of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients progressing to ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study of all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who progressed to ARDS requiring MV and undergone tracheostomy. We aimed to conduct a study to observe the impact of tracheostomy on the mortality of these patients and the impact of timing of tracheostomy on outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 162 patients, 128 (79%) were male and 34 (21%) were female. Early group (≤14 days) comprised 37 patients, while 125 patients were included in late group (>14 days). A total of 91 (56%) patients died at the end of this period. Among the patients who died, 21were included in the early group, while the late group comprised the remaining 70 patients. On comparing the patients who died, the duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly different in the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 12 [11-13] vs. 23 [19-28] days, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The number of days to death also differed significantly between the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 28 [21-38] vs. 24 [14-30] days, <i>P</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early tracheostomy is associated with significantly shorter length of ICU stay in COVID-19 patients that have progressed to ARDS. However, the timing of tracheostomy had no influence on the overall mortality rate in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_39_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonitis may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring endotracheal intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). There are limited data on the optimum time of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients progressing to ARDS.

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who progressed to ARDS requiring MV and undergone tracheostomy. We aimed to conduct a study to observe the impact of tracheostomy on the mortality of these patients and the impact of timing of tracheostomy on outcomes in these patients.

Results: Of the total 162 patients, 128 (79%) were male and 34 (21%) were female. Early group (≤14 days) comprised 37 patients, while 125 patients were included in late group (>14 days). A total of 91 (56%) patients died at the end of this period. Among the patients who died, 21were included in the early group, while the late group comprised the remaining 70 patients. On comparing the patients who died, the duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly different in the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 12 [11-13] vs. 23 [19-28] days, P < 0.001). The number of days to death also differed significantly between the two groups (median [Q1-Q3]: 28 [21-38] vs. 24 [14-30] days, P = 0.009).

Conclusion: Early tracheostomy is associated with significantly shorter length of ICU stay in COVID-19 patients that have progressed to ARDS. However, the timing of tracheostomy had no influence on the overall mortality rate in these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019年冠状病毒病相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的气管切开时机和预后:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)肺炎患者可能发展为急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),需要气管插管和长时间机械通气(MV)。目前关于COVID-19患者进展为ARDS时气管插管的最佳时间的数据有限:这是一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象是所有确诊为 COVID-19 的患者,这些患者均进展为需要 MV 的 ARDS 并接受了气管切开术。我们的目的是观察气管切开术对这些患者死亡率的影响,以及气管切开术的时机对这些患者预后的影响:在 162 名患者中,128 名(79%)为男性,34 名(21%)为女性。早期组(≤14 天)有 37 名患者,晚期组(>14 天)有 125 名患者。共有 91 名(56%)患者在此期间死亡。在死亡的患者中,21 人属于早期组,其余 70 人属于晚期组。对比死亡患者,两组患者在重症监护室(ICU)的住院时间明显不同(中位数[Q1-Q3]:12 [11-13] 对 23 [19-28] 天,P < 0.001)。两组患者的死亡天数也有显著差异(中位数[Q1-Q3]:28 [21-38] vs. 24 [14-30]天,P = 0.009):结论:对于已发展为 ARDS 的 COVID-19 患者,尽早进行气管切开术可明显缩短 ICU 的住院时间。然而,气管切开术的时机对这些患者的总体死亡率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
期刊最新文献
Effect of temperature and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral saturation. Prospective observational study to measure the incidence of chest pain and its association with perioperative factors among parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section with subarachnoid blocks. Response to: "Before attributing basilar artery aneurysm and pericardial tamponade to leptospirosis, alternative causes must be ruled out". Assessment of quality of life in follow-up patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A prospective, observational study from a tertiary care center. Association of obesity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1