Comparison of Length of Stay Between Children Admitted to an Observation Versus Inpatient Unit.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003174
Czer Anthoney Enriquez Lim, Jennifer Bailey, Julie Oh, Imikomobong Ibia, Erick Eiting, Barbara Barnett, Yvette Calderon, Ethan Cowan
{"title":"Comparison of Length of Stay Between Children Admitted to an Observation Versus Inpatient Unit.","authors":"Czer Anthoney Enriquez Lim, Jennifer Bailey, Julie Oh, Imikomobong Ibia, Erick Eiting, Barbara Barnett, Yvette Calderon, Ethan Cowan","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Many children who require hospitalization are ideal candidates for care in pediatric observation units (POUs) rather than inpatient pediatric units. Differences in outcomes between children cared for in these 2 practice settings have not been thoroughly evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, children aged 0 to 18 years admitted to a POU at a community hospital or inpatient unit at a children's hospital were enrolled if they met specific clinical criteria. Information regarding the current illness, medical history, and hospital course was collected. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was analyzed as the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included conversion to inpatient care for the POU group and return to pediatric emergency department within 7 days. Subgroup analysis was conducted on children presenting with respiratory illnesses. Propensity scores were used as a predictor in the final model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighty-one admissions, 92 to POU and 89 to an inpatient unit, were analyzed. Mean LOS was 24.4 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.7-27.1) for observation and 43.2 hours (95% CI, 37.8-48.6) for inpatient ( P < 0.01). Among the 126 children admitted for respiratory illnesses, the mean LOS was 32.3 hours (95% CI, 26.0-38.6) for observation and 48.1 hours (95% CI, 42.2-54.0) for inpatient ( P < 0.01). Survival analysis demonstrated a 1.61 (95% CI, 1.07-2.42) fold shorter time to discharge among children admitted to observation compared with inpatient ( P = 0.02) and a 1.70 (95% CI, 1.07-2.71) fold shorter time to discharge from observation compared with inpatient for respiratory illnesses ( P = 0.03). Within 7 days of discharge, 2 (2%) patients from the observation group and 1 (1%) from the inpatient group returned to the pediatric emergency department.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that POU may provide the means toward efficient care for children in community settings with illnesses requiring brief hospitalizations. Future work including prospective investigations is needed to ascertain the generalizability of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"627-631"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Many children who require hospitalization are ideal candidates for care in pediatric observation units (POUs) rather than inpatient pediatric units. Differences in outcomes between children cared for in these 2 practice settings have not been thoroughly evaluated.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, children aged 0 to 18 years admitted to a POU at a community hospital or inpatient unit at a children's hospital were enrolled if they met specific clinical criteria. Information regarding the current illness, medical history, and hospital course was collected. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was analyzed as the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included conversion to inpatient care for the POU group and return to pediatric emergency department within 7 days. Subgroup analysis was conducted on children presenting with respiratory illnesses. Propensity scores were used as a predictor in the final model.

Results: One hundred eighty-one admissions, 92 to POU and 89 to an inpatient unit, were analyzed. Mean LOS was 24.4 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.7-27.1) for observation and 43.2 hours (95% CI, 37.8-48.6) for inpatient ( P < 0.01). Among the 126 children admitted for respiratory illnesses, the mean LOS was 32.3 hours (95% CI, 26.0-38.6) for observation and 48.1 hours (95% CI, 42.2-54.0) for inpatient ( P < 0.01). Survival analysis demonstrated a 1.61 (95% CI, 1.07-2.42) fold shorter time to discharge among children admitted to observation compared with inpatient ( P = 0.02) and a 1.70 (95% CI, 1.07-2.71) fold shorter time to discharge from observation compared with inpatient for respiratory illnesses ( P = 0.03). Within 7 days of discharge, 2 (2%) patients from the observation group and 1 (1%) from the inpatient group returned to the pediatric emergency department.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that POU may provide the means toward efficient care for children in community settings with illnesses requiring brief hospitalizations. Future work including prospective investigations is needed to ascertain the generalizability of these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入住观察室和住院部儿童的住院时间比较。
目的:许多需要住院治疗的儿童最适合在儿科观察室(POU)而非儿科住院部接受治疗。在这两种实践环境中接受治疗的儿童在治疗效果方面的差异尚未得到全面评估:在这项回顾性队列研究中,社区医院儿科观察室或儿童医院住院部收治的 0 至 18 岁儿童,只要符合特定的临床标准,均被纳入研究范围。研究人员收集了有关当前疾病、病史和住院过程的信息。分析的主要结果是住院时间(LOS);次要结果包括 POU 组转为住院治疗和 7 天内返回儿科急诊室。对患有呼吸系统疾病的儿童进行了分组分析。在最终模型中,倾向评分被用作预测因子:共分析了 181 例入院患儿,其中 92 例入住 POU,89 例入住住院部。观察病例的平均住院时间为 24.4 小时(95% 置信区间 [CI],21.7-27.1),住院病例的平均住院时间为 43.2 小时(95% 置信区间 [CI],37.8-48.6)(P < 0.01)。在因呼吸道疾病入院的 126 名儿童中,观察期平均为 32.3 小时(95% CI,26.0-38.6),住院期平均为 48.1 小时(95% CI,42.2-54.0)(P <0.01)。生存分析表明,与住院病人相比,接受观察的儿童出院时间缩短了 1.61 倍(95% CI,1.07-2.42)(P = 0.02),与住院病人相比,患呼吸系统疾病的儿童出院时间缩短了 1.70 倍(95% CI,1.07-2.71)(P = 0.03)。出院后7天内,观察组有2名(2%)患者返回儿科急诊室,住院组有1名(1%)患者返回儿科急诊室:这些研究结果表明,POU 可以为社区环境中患有需要短暂住院治疗的疾病的儿童提供有效的治疗手段。今后还需要开展包括前瞻性调查在内的工作,以确定这些研究结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study of a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Procedural Curriculum for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows. Evaluation of a Large Language Model on the American Academy of Pediatrics' PREP Emergency Medicine Question Bank. Neonatal Mastitis: Clinical Presentation and Approach to Evaluation and Management. Neonatal Mastitis: Clinical Presentation and Approach to Evaluation and Management. NOTE TO REVIEWERS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1