Implementation of a Suicide Risk Screening Clinical Pathway in a Children's Hospital: A Feasibility Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003180
Khyati Brahmbhatt, Gabriel Devlin, Nisa Atigapramoj, Arpi Bekmezian, Chan Park, Tina Han, Brian Dentoni-Lasofsky, Christina Mangurian, Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan
{"title":"Implementation of a Suicide Risk Screening Clinical Pathway in a Children's Hospital: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Khyati Brahmbhatt, Gabriel Devlin, Nisa Atigapramoj, Arpi Bekmezian, Chan Park, Tina Han, Brian Dentoni-Lasofsky, Christina Mangurian, Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Youth suicide is a pressing global concern. Prior research has developed evidence-driven clinical pathways to screen and identify suicide risk among pediatric patients in outpatient clinics, emergency departments (ED) and inpatient hospital units. However, the feasibility of implementing these pathways remains to be established. Here, we share the results of a hospital-wide \"youth suicide risk screening pathway\" implementation trial at an urban academic pediatric hospital to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-tier \"youth suicide risk screening pathway\" using The Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) was implemented for patients aged 10 to 26 years who received care at an urban academic pediatric hospital's emergency department or inpatient units. We retrospectively reviewed implementation outcomes of this pathway from January 1 to August 31, 2019. The feasibility of this implementation was measured by assessing the pathway's degree of execution, fidelity, resource utilization, and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4108 eligible patient encounters, 3424 (83%) completed the screen. Forty-eight (1%) screened acute positive, 263 (8%) screened nonacute positive and 3113 (91%) screened negative. Patients reporting positive suicide risk were more likely to be older and female, although more males required specialty mental health evaluations. Pathway fidelity was 83% among all positive screens and 94% among acute positive screens. The clinical pathway implementation required 16 hours of provider training time and was associated with slightly longer length of stay for inpatients that screened positive (4 vs 3 days). Sixty-five percent of nurses and 78% of social work providers surveyed supported participation in this effort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is feasible to implement a youth suicide risk screening pathway without overburdening the system at an urban academic pediatric hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"e179-e185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Youth suicide is a pressing global concern. Prior research has developed evidence-driven clinical pathways to screen and identify suicide risk among pediatric patients in outpatient clinics, emergency departments (ED) and inpatient hospital units. However, the feasibility of implementing these pathways remains to be established. Here, we share the results of a hospital-wide "youth suicide risk screening pathway" implementation trial at an urban academic pediatric hospital to address this gap.

Methods: A 3-tier "youth suicide risk screening pathway" using The Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) was implemented for patients aged 10 to 26 years who received care at an urban academic pediatric hospital's emergency department or inpatient units. We retrospectively reviewed implementation outcomes of this pathway from January 1 to August 31, 2019. The feasibility of this implementation was measured by assessing the pathway's degree of execution, fidelity, resource utilization, and acceptability.

Results: Of 4108 eligible patient encounters, 3424 (83%) completed the screen. Forty-eight (1%) screened acute positive, 263 (8%) screened nonacute positive and 3113 (91%) screened negative. Patients reporting positive suicide risk were more likely to be older and female, although more males required specialty mental health evaluations. Pathway fidelity was 83% among all positive screens and 94% among acute positive screens. The clinical pathway implementation required 16 hours of provider training time and was associated with slightly longer length of stay for inpatients that screened positive (4 vs 3 days). Sixty-five percent of nurses and 78% of social work providers surveyed supported participation in this effort.

Conclusions: It is feasible to implement a youth suicide risk screening pathway without overburdening the system at an urban academic pediatric hospital.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿童医院实施自杀风险筛查临床路径:可行性研究。
目标:青少年自杀是全球亟待解决的问题。先前的研究已经制定了以证据为导向的临床路径,用于筛查和识别门诊诊所、急诊科(ED)和住院部儿科患者的自杀风险。然而,实施这些路径的可行性仍有待确定。在此,我们分享一家城市学术儿科医院在全院范围内开展的 "青少年自杀风险筛查路径 "实施试验的结果,以弥补这一不足:方法:在一家城市学术儿科医院的急诊科或住院部,对接受治疗的 10 至 26 岁患者实施了使用 "自杀筛查问题"(ASQ)的三层 "青少年自杀风险筛查路径"。我们回顾性地回顾了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日期间该路径的实施结果。我们通过评估该路径的执行程度、忠实度、资源利用率和可接受性来衡量实施的可行性:在 4108 例符合条件的患者中,有 3424 例(83%)完成了筛查。其中 48 人(1%)筛查出急性期阳性,263 人(8%)筛查出非急性期阳性,3113 人(91%)筛查出阴性。自杀风险呈阳性的患者多为老年人和女性,但需要进行专业心理健康评估的男性患者较多。在所有阳性筛查中,路径忠实度为 83%,在急性期阳性筛查中,路径忠实度为 94%。临床路径的实施需要 16 个小时的医疗服务提供者培训时间,而且筛查呈阳性的住院患者的住院时间略有延长(4 天对 3 天)。接受调查的 65% 的护士和 78% 的社会工作者支持参与这项工作:结论:在城市学术儿科医院实施青少年自杀风险筛查路径是可行的,不会给系统带来过重负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Development of a Scoring Model to Predict Severe Dengue in Children at Admission in the Emergency Care: An Observational Study. Minor Head Trauma in Children Younger Than 3 Months and Clinical Predictors of Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injuries. Oral Ketamine and Midazolam for Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study. The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale and Perceived Staff Workload: Evidence for Construct Validity in a Pediatric Setting. Presence of Sonographic Secondary Signs Without Visualization of Appendix Is Indicative of Appendicitis in Children Younger Than 5 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1