Regulatory Framework for Drug-Device Combination Products in the United States, Europe, and Korea.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00661-2
Joo Hee Kim, Sera Kwon, Ju Eun Seol, Mi Hye Kim, Su Dong Kim
{"title":"Regulatory Framework for Drug-Device Combination Products in the United States, Europe, and Korea.","authors":"Joo Hee Kim, Sera Kwon, Ju Eun Seol, Mi Hye Kim, Su Dong Kim","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00661-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Combination products (CPs) combine two or more product types such as drugs, devices, and/or biological products for increased safety and clinical effectiveness. The emergence of innovative CPs poses new challenges for regulatory agencies in assigning jurisdiction for premarket review and oversight. In US, the 1990 Safe Medical Devices Act defines and provides classification criteria for CPs, and the US government has developed a regulatory process through multiple acts, including the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016. Meanwhile, regulators in the European Union (EU) and the Republic of Korea have recently recognized the importance of premarket pathways for CPs. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has issued guidelines and explanations on compliance issues related to drug-device CPs under MDR. EMA doesn't have the definitions of CPs, but uses the term drug-device combination products (drug-device CPs). CPs are categorized as drugs or medical devices, which follow their relevant regulatory framework. The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) in Korea has legal definitions of CPs under the Notice of the MFDS. CPs are designated as drugs or medical devices according to their primary mode of actions (PMOA) and follow regulatory processes through the framework of drugs or medical devices. This study aims to comprehensively summarize the regulatory oversight of CPs by analyzing the regulatory policies and legal frameworks in the US, the EU, and Korea. The regulatory challenges encountered when developing CPs are also discussed. With specific emphasis on the combination of drugs and devices, this study provides in-depth insights into the regulatory landscape, shedding light on the unique challenges associated with the development of CPs for this particular intersection of drugs and devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"796-806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00661-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Combination products (CPs) combine two or more product types such as drugs, devices, and/or biological products for increased safety and clinical effectiveness. The emergence of innovative CPs poses new challenges for regulatory agencies in assigning jurisdiction for premarket review and oversight. In US, the 1990 Safe Medical Devices Act defines and provides classification criteria for CPs, and the US government has developed a regulatory process through multiple acts, including the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016. Meanwhile, regulators in the European Union (EU) and the Republic of Korea have recently recognized the importance of premarket pathways for CPs. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has issued guidelines and explanations on compliance issues related to drug-device CPs under MDR. EMA doesn't have the definitions of CPs, but uses the term drug-device combination products (drug-device CPs). CPs are categorized as drugs or medical devices, which follow their relevant regulatory framework. The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) in Korea has legal definitions of CPs under the Notice of the MFDS. CPs are designated as drugs or medical devices according to their primary mode of actions (PMOA) and follow regulatory processes through the framework of drugs or medical devices. This study aims to comprehensively summarize the regulatory oversight of CPs by analyzing the regulatory policies and legal frameworks in the US, the EU, and Korea. The regulatory challenges encountered when developing CPs are also discussed. With specific emphasis on the combination of drugs and devices, this study provides in-depth insights into the regulatory landscape, shedding light on the unique challenges associated with the development of CPs for this particular intersection of drugs and devices.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国、欧洲和韩国的药物-器械组合产品监管框架。
组合产品(CPs)结合了两种或两种以上的产品类型,如药物、器械和/或生物制品,以提高安全性和临床有效性。创新型 CP 的出现给监管机构分配上市前审查和监督的管辖权带来了新的挑战。在美国,1990 年的《安全医疗器械法案》定义并提供了 CP 的分类标准,美国政府通过多项法案制定了监管流程,包括 2016 年的《21 世纪治愈法案》。与此同时,欧盟(EU)和大韩民国的监管机构最近也认识到了CP上市前途径的重要性。欧洲药品管理局(EMA)就 MDR 下与药物-器械 CP 相关的合规问题发布了指南和解释。EMA 没有 CP 的定义,但使用了药物-器械组合产品(药物-器械 CP)这一术语。CPs 被归类为药物或医疗器械,并遵循其相关的监管框架。韩国食品和药品安全部(MFDS)在其《通知》中对 CP 有法律定义。氯化石蜡根据其主要作用模式(PMOA)被指定为药品或医疗器械,并按照药品或医疗器械的框架进行监管。本研究旨在通过分析美国、欧盟和韩国的监管政策和法律框架,全面总结 CPs 的监管情况。本研究还讨论了在开发 CP 时遇到的监管挑战。本研究特别强调了药物和器械的组合,深入剖析了监管环境,揭示了针对药物和器械这一特殊交叉领域开发 CPs 所面临的独特挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Borrowing Methods for Incorporating Historical Data in Single-Arm Phase II Clinical Trials. Testing the Feasibility of a Digital Point of Care Solution for the Trusted Near Real-Time Bidirectional Exchange of Novel and Informative Adverse Event Information. Better Medicines for Children: Lessons Learnt and Share Learnings at the EFGCP Annual Paediatric Conferences. An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database for MAGnetic Expansion Control Spinal Rods. Principles for Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ceramic Dental Implants in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1