Technology Use Among Older Adults and Their Caregivers: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.2196/50759
Shinduk Lee, Marcia G Ory, Deborah Vollmer Dahlke, Matthew Lee Smith
{"title":"Technology Use Among Older Adults and Their Caregivers: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.","authors":"Shinduk Lee, Marcia G Ory, Deborah Vollmer Dahlke, Matthew Lee Smith","doi":"10.2196/50759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informal caregivers are called upon to provide substantial care, but more needs to be known about technology use among older adult and caregiver dyads.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study described technology use among older adults and their caregivers, explored potential correlates of technology use, and highlighted implications for practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among unpaid caregivers of older adults (n=486). Primary outcomes were self-reported technology (devices and functions) use among caregivers and their oldest care recipient. The concordance of technology use among caregivers and care recipients was also examined. Multivariable regression models were conducted separately for caregivers and care recipients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater proportions of caregivers used all examined technologies, except for the medication alerts or tracking function, than care recipients. Caregivers used an average of 3.4 devices and 4.2 functions, compared to 1.8 devices and 1.6 functions used by their care recipients. Among caregivers, younger age, higher income, and higher education were associated with more technology use (P<.05). Among care recipients, younger age, not having cognitive dysfunction, and caregiver's technology use were associated with more technology use (P<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding technology use patterns and device adoption across diverse caregiver and care recipient populations is increasingly important for enhancing geriatric care. Findings can guide recommendations about appropriate technology interventions and help providers communicate and share information more effectively with patients and their caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e50759"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11084119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Informal caregivers are called upon to provide substantial care, but more needs to be known about technology use among older adult and caregiver dyads.

Objective: This study described technology use among older adults and their caregivers, explored potential correlates of technology use, and highlighted implications for practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among unpaid caregivers of older adults (n=486). Primary outcomes were self-reported technology (devices and functions) use among caregivers and their oldest care recipient. The concordance of technology use among caregivers and care recipients was also examined. Multivariable regression models were conducted separately for caregivers and care recipients.

Results: Greater proportions of caregivers used all examined technologies, except for the medication alerts or tracking function, than care recipients. Caregivers used an average of 3.4 devices and 4.2 functions, compared to 1.8 devices and 1.6 functions used by their care recipients. Among caregivers, younger age, higher income, and higher education were associated with more technology use (P<.05). Among care recipients, younger age, not having cognitive dysfunction, and caregiver's technology use were associated with more technology use (P<.05).

Conclusions: Understanding technology use patterns and device adoption across diverse caregiver and care recipient populations is increasingly important for enhancing geriatric care. Findings can guide recommendations about appropriate technology interventions and help providers communicate and share information more effectively with patients and their caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人及其照顾者的技术使用情况:横断面调查研究。
背景:非正式照顾者被要求提供大量照顾,但我们需要更多地了解老年人和照顾者之间的技术使用情况:本研究描述了老年人及其照护者的技术使用情况,探讨了技术使用的潜在相关因素,并强调了对实践的影响:对老年人的无偿照顾者(人数=486)进行了横断面调查。主要结果是护理者及其最年长的接受护理者自我报告的技术(设备和功能)使用情况。此外,还考察了照护者和受照护者使用技术的一致性。对护理者和受护理者分别进行了多变量回归模型分析:除药物提醒或追踪功能外,护理人员使用所有技术的比例均高于护理对象。护理人员平均使用 3.4 种设备和 4.2 种功能,而护理对象平均使用 1.8 种设备和 1.6 种功能。在护理人员中,年龄越小、收入越高、教育程度越高的人使用的技术就越多(结论:护理人员使用的技术越多,受护理者使用的技术就越多):了解不同护理者和接受护理者的技术使用模式和设备采用情况对于加强老年护理越来越重要。研究结果可以为适当的技术干预建议提供指导,并帮助医疗服务提供者更有效地与患者及其护理人员沟通和分享信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Subjective Cognitive Concerns are Associated with Worse Performance on Mobile-App Based Cognitive Assessment: An Observational Study in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study. Exploring the Landscape of Standards and Guidelines in AgeTech Design and Development: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis. Decoding the Influence of eHealth on Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in Older Adults: Qualitative Analysis of Self-Determination Through the Motivational Technology Model. Interrelationships Among Individual Factors, Family Factors, and Quality of Life in Older Chinese Adults: Cross-Sectional Study Using Structural Equation Modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1