Risk of Hospitalization Associated with Use of Consumer-Directed Attendant Care.

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging & Social Policy Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1080/08959420.2024.2348426
Ray Van Cleve, Evan Cole, Coleman Drake, Grant Martsolf, Howard Degenholtz
{"title":"Risk of Hospitalization Associated with Use of Consumer-Directed Attendant Care.","authors":"Ray Van Cleve, Evan Cole, Coleman Drake, Grant Martsolf, Howard Degenholtz","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2024.2348426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older people with disabilities living independently often use attendant care, also known as Personal Assistive Services (PAS). The aides providing care can come from a home health agency contracted by the state Medicaid authority, known as agency-directed PAS, or the Medicaid recipient can receive a monthly budget and arrange their own care, known as consumer-directed care. Consumer-directed care is hypothesized to have some possible benefits but could also potentially lead to health hazards. This study examined whether people receiving consumer-directed PAS versus people receiving agency-directed PAS faced a higher risk of hospitalization. The data for this study came from Pennsylvania Medicaid claims, enrollment files, standardized assessments, and hospitalization claims from Medicare and Medicaid. The analysis used two-stage least square regression, with the percentage of people in a county using consumer-directed care as an instrument for the type of PAS. People using consumer-directed care did not have a statistically significant difference in risk for hospitalization compared to people using agency-directed PAS (<i>p</i> = .976). Risk of hospitalization was not different for people using consumer-directed care compared to people using agency-directed care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2024.2348426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older people with disabilities living independently often use attendant care, also known as Personal Assistive Services (PAS). The aides providing care can come from a home health agency contracted by the state Medicaid authority, known as agency-directed PAS, or the Medicaid recipient can receive a monthly budget and arrange their own care, known as consumer-directed care. Consumer-directed care is hypothesized to have some possible benefits but could also potentially lead to health hazards. This study examined whether people receiving consumer-directed PAS versus people receiving agency-directed PAS faced a higher risk of hospitalization. The data for this study came from Pennsylvania Medicaid claims, enrollment files, standardized assessments, and hospitalization claims from Medicare and Medicaid. The analysis used two-stage least square regression, with the percentage of people in a county using consumer-directed care as an instrument for the type of PAS. People using consumer-directed care did not have a statistically significant difference in risk for hospitalization compared to people using agency-directed PAS (p = .976). Risk of hospitalization was not different for people using consumer-directed care compared to people using agency-directed care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与使用消费者指导型护理相关的住院风险。
独立生活的残疾老年人通常会使用护理员护理,也称为个人辅助服务 (PAS)。提供护理的助手可以来自与州医疗补助机构签订合同的家庭医疗机构,即机构指导的个人辅助服务,也可以由医疗补助受益人按月领取预算并自行安排护理,即消费者指导的护理。据推测,消费者指导型护理可能会带来一些好处,但也有可能导致健康危害。本研究探讨了接受消费者指导型护理的人与接受机构指导型护理的人相比,是否面临更高的住院风险。本研究的数据来自宾夕法尼亚州医疗补助申请、注册档案、标准化评估以及医疗保险和医疗补助的住院申请。分析采用了两阶段最小二乘法回归,以一个县使用消费者指导型护理的人数百分比作为 PAS 类型的工具。与使用机构指导型 PAS 的人相比,使用消费者指导型护理的人在住院风险方面没有显著的统计学差异(p = .976)。与使用机构指导型护理服务的人群相比,使用消费者指导型护理服务的人群的住院风险没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
期刊最新文献
Does Social Support Alleviate the Caregiving Burden of Adult Children? Evidence from Chinese Long-Term Care Insurance Pilot Program. Mass Media Exposure Moderates the Association of Education and Wealth with Enrollment in Health Insurance Among Older Adults Aged 60 Years and Older in India. The Impact of Age-Based COVID-19 Pandemic Regulations on Older People in Turkey: A Capability Approach. Provision of Home & Community Based Services to Veterans by Race, Rurality, and Neighborhood Deprivation Index. Understanding Organizational Resilience of Care Homes for Older People During COVID-19 in China: A Qualitative Study with Post-Pandemic Policy Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1