Measurement of Knee Extensor Torque During Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation: Comparison of the Forces Induced by Different Stimulators.

IF 2.9 Q1 REHABILITATION Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.5535/arm.230025
Masanori Kamiue, Akio Tsubahara, Tomotaka Ito, Yasuhiro Koike
{"title":"Measurement of Knee Extensor Torque During Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation: Comparison of the Forces Induced by Different Stimulators.","authors":"Masanori Kamiue, Akio Tsubahara, Tomotaka Ito, Yasuhiro Koike","doi":"10.5535/arm.230025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factors that induce strong contractions during repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) and compare the muscle torque induced by two stimulators (Stim A and Stim B) with different coil properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>rPMS was applied to the right vastus lateralis of 30 healthy young adults. Stim A contained a 10.1 cm2 rectangular iron core coil, while Stim B contained a 191 cm2 round coil. The knee extensor torque (KET) induced by rPMS at 30 Hz was measured isometrically and divided by the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) to obtain a relative value of MVC (%MVC). KET at 100% intensity of Stim A (A100%, 1.08 T) was compared to those at 100% or 70% intensity of Stim B (B100%, 1.47 T vs. B70%, 1.07 T). Additionally, we conducted a comprehensive literature search for studies that measured the KET during rPMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the mean values of %MVC using B100% and B70% were significantly greater than that using A100%. Furthermore, the KET induced by Stim B was found to be larger than that described in previous reports, unless booster units were used to directly stimulate the main trunk of the femoral nerve.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stim B induced a stronger muscle contraction force than Stim A did. This may be because the larger the coil area, the wider the area that can be stimulated. Additionally, a circular coil allows for deeper stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":" ","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.230025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the factors that induce strong contractions during repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) and compare the muscle torque induced by two stimulators (Stim A and Stim B) with different coil properties.

Methods: rPMS was applied to the right vastus lateralis of 30 healthy young adults. Stim A contained a 10.1 cm2 rectangular iron core coil, while Stim B contained a 191 cm2 round coil. The knee extensor torque (KET) induced by rPMS at 30 Hz was measured isometrically and divided by the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) to obtain a relative value of MVC (%MVC). KET at 100% intensity of Stim A (A100%, 1.08 T) was compared to those at 100% or 70% intensity of Stim B (B100%, 1.47 T vs. B70%, 1.07 T). Additionally, we conducted a comprehensive literature search for studies that measured the KET during rPMS.

Results: Both the mean values of %MVC using B100% and B70% were significantly greater than that using A100%. Furthermore, the KET induced by Stim B was found to be larger than that described in previous reports, unless booster units were used to directly stimulate the main trunk of the femoral nerve.

Conclusion: Stim B induced a stronger muscle contraction force than Stim A did. This may be because the larger the coil area, the wider the area that can be stimulated. Additionally, a circular coil allows for deeper stimulation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复性外周磁刺激时膝关节伸展力矩的测量:比较不同刺激器的作用力
目的研究在重复性外周磁刺激(rPMS)过程中诱发强烈收缩的因素,并比较具有不同线圈特性的两种刺激器(刺激 A 和刺激 B)诱发的肌肉扭矩。Stim A 包含一个 10.1 平方厘米的矩形铁芯线圈,而 Stim B 包含一个 191 平方厘米的圆形线圈。以 30 Hz 的频率测量 rPMS 引起的膝关节伸肌扭矩(KET),并将其除以最大自主收缩力(MVC),得出 MVC 的相对值(%MVC)。将 100%强度刺激 A(A100%,1.08 T)下的 KET 与 100%或 70%强度刺激 B(B100%,1.47 T vs. B70%,1.07 T)下的 KET 进行比较。此外,我们还对测量 rPMS 期间 KET 的研究进行了全面的文献检索:结果:使用 B100% 和 B70% 时,%MVC 的平均值均明显高于使用 A100% 时。此外,除非使用增压器直接刺激股神经主干,否则发现刺激 B 诱导的 KET 比之前的报告中描述的要大:结论:刺激 B 比刺激 A 诱导的肌肉收缩力更强。这可能是因为线圈面积越大,可刺激的区域就越宽。此外,圆形线圈还能进行更深层次的刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paving the Path to Universal Health Coverage: Incorporating Rehabilitation Into Primary Healthcare. Limb Position Sense Across Multiple Proprioceptive Tasks in Healthy Adults. Correction: High-Intensity Interval Training Enhances Cardiovascular and Functional Outcomes Compared With Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Higher-Functioning Chronic Stroke. Differential Activation of the Multifidus and Erector Spinae During Asymmetric Spinal Stabilizing Exercise in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Effectiveness of the National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children in Detecting Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Nationwide Population-Based Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1