COMPARISON BETWEEN PORTALS FOR PLACEMENT OF ANCHORS IN SHOULDER INSTABILITY.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2024-05-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443
José Carlos Souza Vilela, Ivana Duval de Araújo, Mabelly Correa Albuquerque, Anna Luiza Amancio Vidal, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado
{"title":"COMPARISON BETWEEN PORTALS FOR PLACEMENT OF ANCHORS IN SHOULDER INSTABILITY.","authors":"José Carlos Souza Vilela, Ivana Duval de Araújo, Mabelly Correa Albuquerque, Anna Luiza Amancio Vidal, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>\n <i>to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o'clock portals.</i>\n </p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\n <i>retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o'clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole.</i>\n </p><p><strong>Results: </strong>\n <i>the 5-o'clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o'clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05).</i>\n </p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>the 5-o'clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o'clock one.</i> <b><i>Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"32 spe1","pages":"e265443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o'clock portals.

Methods: retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o'clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole.

Results: the 5-o'clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o'clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: the 5-o'clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o'clock one. Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在肩关节不稳症患者中,比较不同的锚栓置入方式。
目的:在关节镜治疗肩关节不稳定时,比较 3 点钟和 5 点钟方向锚定定位的影像学效果。 方法:对2013年1月至2018年1月期间由Unimed BH医院的两名肩关节外科医生手术的36名患者进行回顾性研究。每位外科医生只使用了 3 点钟或 5 点钟方向的其中一个门户。术后拍片后,我们对最大盂轴线、锚插入角度和与下极点的距离进行了角度比较。 结果:5点钟方向的入口比3点钟方向的入口位置更好,与盂缘的正交性更好(P < 0.05)。 结论:5点钟方向的入口比3点钟方向的入口能更好地放置锚。证据等级 II,临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
期刊最新文献
PREVALENCE OF PALMARIS LONGUS TENDON AGENESIS IN A POPULATION OF MEDICAL STUDENTS. HUMERAL SHAFT NONUNION. RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF SEVERAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES. ANALYSIS OF INTRINSIC FOOT MUSCLE STRENGTH IN DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY COMPARED WITH HEALTHY CONTROLS. ANEURYSMAL BONE CYST: A CASE SERIES OF AN AGGRESSIVE BENIGN TUMOR. PATIENTS WITH SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA AFTER TREATMENT BY NON ORTHOPEDIC ONCOLOGIC SURGEONS: EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE, STAGING, AND THERAPEUTIC CHALLENGES.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1