Ezequiel Lerech, Jean P Carrión-Arcela, Cristhian E Scatularo, Franklin Cueva-Torres, Melisa Antoniolli, Rodrigo Núñez-Méndez, Sebastián García-Zamora, Álvaro Sosa-Liprandi, Adrián Baranchuk, Ezequiel J Zaidel
{"title":"[Characteristics of cardiologist training in Latin America: a survey of the Interamerican Society of Cardiology].","authors":"Ezequiel Lerech, Jean P Carrión-Arcela, Cristhian E Scatularo, Franklin Cueva-Torres, Melisa Antoniolli, Rodrigo Núñez-Méndez, Sebastián García-Zamora, Álvaro Sosa-Liprandi, Adrián Baranchuk, Ezequiel J Zaidel","doi":"10.24875/ACM.23000215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe the characteristics of the different cardiology medical residencies in Latin America.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional study that aims to evaluate the characteristics of cardiology residencies in Spanish-speaking countries of Latin America, through self-administered electronic surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred seven residents of 147 residences were surveyed. Mean age was 31 years and 63% were male. Ninety eight percent carry out their training in the capital city. The average total training time is 4.8 years. Forty four percent complete their residency in internal medicine prior to starting cardiology, and 10% have no prior training. In cardiology training is 3 years in most countries. Fifty four percent present academic activities every day and 16% only once or less, consisting of theoretical classes (93%), clinical cases (85%), bibliographic workshops (69%), and writing scientific papers (68%). Supervision is carried out by the chief resident (45%), resident coordinator (44%), resident instructor (27%) or the department head (54%), while 2.6% do not present supervision. The main rotations were echocardiography (99%), hemodynamics (96%), coronary unit (93%), and electrophysiology (92%). Residents highlighted the need to improve academic activities (23%) and scientific production (12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are important differences in the academic and practical training between the residences of the different countries of America.</p>","PeriodicalId":93885,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":" ","pages":"341-348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.23000215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Describe the characteristics of the different cardiology medical residencies in Latin America.
Method: Cross-sectional study that aims to evaluate the characteristics of cardiology residencies in Spanish-speaking countries of Latin America, through self-administered electronic surveys.
Results: Three hundred seven residents of 147 residences were surveyed. Mean age was 31 years and 63% were male. Ninety eight percent carry out their training in the capital city. The average total training time is 4.8 years. Forty four percent complete their residency in internal medicine prior to starting cardiology, and 10% have no prior training. In cardiology training is 3 years in most countries. Fifty four percent present academic activities every day and 16% only once or less, consisting of theoretical classes (93%), clinical cases (85%), bibliographic workshops (69%), and writing scientific papers (68%). Supervision is carried out by the chief resident (45%), resident coordinator (44%), resident instructor (27%) or the department head (54%), while 2.6% do not present supervision. The main rotations were echocardiography (99%), hemodynamics (96%), coronary unit (93%), and electrophysiology (92%). Residents highlighted the need to improve academic activities (23%) and scientific production (12%).
Conclusions: There are important differences in the academic and practical training between the residences of the different countries of America.