Discrimination faced by radiology residents: an analysis of experiences and mitigation strategies

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.05.013
{"title":"Discrimination faced by radiology residents: an analysis of experiences and mitigation strategies","authors":"","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and objectives</h3><p>Literature shows that discrimination has been pervasive in the field of medicine. The aim of this study was to collect experiences related to discrimination among US radiology residents, including type and source, as well as the residents’ perception on lectures about discrimination and harassment. We also explored the barriers to reporting, and suggested strategies to overcome them.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, an online survey was sent to program directors and coordinators across the US, who were asked to forward the link to their radiology residents. A reminder email was sent over a period of 4 months. The participants were reassured the survey was confidential and anonymous.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the respondents, the most reported types of discrimination were based in gender, race and nationality, the majority of which not being reported. The most common perpetrators were attending radiologists, co-residents, technologists, and patients. The main barriers for reporting were fear of retaliation, confidentiality concerns, and skepticism about a positive outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study examines some experiences of discrimination shared by residents during their training, with gender and race being the most common causes. This sheds light into a hidden and unspoken issue and highlights the need for more active discussions in radiology on microaggressions and implicit bias. Our data can guide future studies as well as residency programs to build effective strategies to address discrimination, aiming for sustainable changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 5","pages":"Pages 600-605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11283936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824000872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives

Literature shows that discrimination has been pervasive in the field of medicine. The aim of this study was to collect experiences related to discrimination among US radiology residents, including type and source, as well as the residents’ perception on lectures about discrimination and harassment. We also explored the barriers to reporting, and suggested strategies to overcome them.

Material and methods

Following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, an online survey was sent to program directors and coordinators across the US, who were asked to forward the link to their radiology residents. A reminder email was sent over a period of 4 months. The participants were reassured the survey was confidential and anonymous.

Results

Among the respondents, the most reported types of discrimination were based in gender, race and nationality, the majority of which not being reported. The most common perpetrators were attending radiologists, co-residents, technologists, and patients. The main barriers for reporting were fear of retaliation, confidentiality concerns, and skepticism about a positive outcome.

Conclusion

Our study examines some experiences of discrimination shared by residents during their training, with gender and race being the most common causes. This sheds light into a hidden and unspoken issue and highlights the need for more active discussions in radiology on microaggressions and implicit bias. Our data can guide future studies as well as residency programs to build effective strategies to address discrimination, aiming for sustainable changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射科住院医师面临的歧视:经验与缓解策略分析。
理由和目标:文献显示,歧视在医学领域一直普遍存在。本研究旨在收集美国放射科住院医师遭受歧视的经历,包括类型和来源,以及住院医师对有关歧视和骚扰的讲座的看法。我们还探讨了报告的障碍,并提出了克服这些障碍的策略:经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,我们向全美的项目主任和协调员发送了一份在线调查,并要求他们将链接转发给其放射科住院医师。在 4 个月的时间里,我们还发送了一封提醒邮件。他们向参与者保证调查是保密和匿名的:在受访者中,报告最多的歧视类型是基于性别、种族和国籍的歧视,其中大部分没有报告。最常见的肇事者是放射科主治医师、合作住院医师、技术人员和患者。报告的主要障碍是担心报复、保密问题以及对积极结果的怀疑:我们的研究探讨了住院医师在培训期间遭受歧视的一些经历,其中性别和种族是最常见的原因。这揭示了一个隐藏的、不为人知的问题,并强调了放射科需要更积极地讨论微侵害和隐性偏见。我们的数据可以指导未来的研究和住院医师培训计划,以建立有效的策略来解决歧视问题,从而实现可持续的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Continued improvement to imaging diagnosis and treatment triage of endometriosis: The role of the multi-disciplinary conference Success factors for interventions to reduce low-value imaging. Six crucial lessons learned from a practical case study in Norway Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1